Best Android smartwatch 2025

Choosing the best Android smartwatches, unsurprisingly, starts with Wear OS watches like the Galaxy Watch 7 and Pixel Watch 3, which integrate closely with Android phones.

But having tested dozens of smartwatches as Wearables editor, I can't call these the definitive "best" picks when you might prioritize other perks like battery life, style, or affordability.

The Android Central team has worn, field-tested, and reviewed the picks and alternates below. I've specifically worn and tested seven of our top nine picks, and my colleagues have strongly recommended the other two.

While you should start your search with Samsung and Google, I'll also highlight brands like OnePlus for better battery life or Garmin for both longevity and fitness, at the cost of "smarts." It's all about picking your best Android smartwatch, and I'll help you find it.

Written by
Photo of Michael Hicks, Senior Editor of Android Central
Written by
Michael Hicks

Michael Hicks is Android Central's resident smartwatch geek, having reviewed or tested dozens of wearables from Samsung, Google, Apple, Garmin, Fitbit, Coros, Polar, Withings, Amazfit, and others. He spends his free time running or hiking while wearing several watches at once, testing which is most accurate.

At a glance

Best overall

Simple Digital watch face on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7

(Image credit: Ara Wagoner / Android Central)
Best overall

Specifications

Display: 1.3- (432x432) or 1.5-inch (480x480) AMOLED
Processor: Samsung Exynos W1000
Memory: 2GB + 32GB
Battery life: 2 days
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM / IP68)
LTE: Yes (optional)
GPS: ✔️ (dual-band)
NFC: ✔️
Health sensors: HRM, ECG, BIA, SpO2, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 28.8g/ 33.8g

Reasons to buy

+
13 HR LEDs, dual-band GPS for improved accuracy
+
Four years of Wear OS upgrades
+
Large, bright, scratch-resistant displays
+
Affordably priced and comfortably light
+
Upgraded processor for faster app loading
+
New Galaxy AI analysis like Energy Score

Reasons to avoid

-
Battery life no longer top of class
-
No more Wireless Power Share
-
Not too different from Galaxy Watch 6 in design

The Galaxy Watch 7 looks unchanged from past models on the surface, but plenty was upgraded under the surface. Our Galaxy Watch 7 reviewer was worried about it being a "re-run," but praised the new gesture tricks, Energy Score insights, and the new processor that makes it the "zippiest smartwatch" she's ever used.

I spent more time testing the Galaxy Watch Ultra than the Watch 7, but many of the Ultra's best qualities are shared by the much-cheaper Watch 7, like the tripled HR LEDs and new dual-band GPS for better accuracy. Both watches had surprisingly good accuracy in our testing, which should keep athletes happy.

Other Android watches are only now starting to catch up to the Galaxy Watch series in areas like its large, thin-bordered display, MIL-STD-810H and IP68 durability, and fast charging speeds. And they still fall behind in one key area: Samsung offers four years of software and security updates, so you can expect your Watch 7 to last until 2028, when other watches would be long abandoned.

The Galaxy Watch 7 isn't as long-lived as other Android watches, but it's much lighter and more comfortable for all-day wear. Based on the Galaxy Watch 8 leaks we've seen, the Watch 8 Classic will be a bulky fusion of the Classic and Ultra, if that sounds appealing.

Considering how often the Watch 7 is discounted, and that it'll get the One UI 8 Watch software upgrades and Gemini support before the end of 2025, I see little reason to wait!

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

2 sizes, bright, narrow-bordered, with a digital bezel trick

★★★★★

Design

Flat and plain with no classic style or premium materials, but comfortably light

★★★☆☆

Price

Reasonably affordable, and the size/ LTE upgrades aren't too pricey

★★★★☆

Performance

Fast, revamped Exynos processor with plenty of RAM.

★★★★★

Battery life

40–48 hours is falling behind the Wear OS pack, but still better than Google and Apple.

★★★☆☆

Health

Complete sensor suite with accurate data and sleep analysis. New data like AGEs Index isn't consumer-ready yet.

★★★★☆

Fitness

Excellent GPS and HR accuracy, plus useful Energy Score. Samsung Health is popular but weak on long-term training.

★★★★☆

Software

Four Wear OS updates, One UI Watch is a beloved option with Google & Samsung apps

★★★★★

Best for Wear OS

The Google Pixel Watch 3 on a white counter, showing the Big Time watch face.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)
Best for Wear OS

Specifications

Display: 1.2-inch (384x384) or 1.4-inch (450x450) AMOLED
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon W5, Cortex M33
Memory: 2GB + 32GB
Battery life: 24 hours (AOD on)
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM)
LTE: Yes, Optional
GPS: ✔️
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, ECG, cEDA, SpO2, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 31g / 37g

Reasons to buy

+
Two display sizes, both with smaller borders and better Hz / nits
+
Fitbit software upgrades for runners
+
Wear OS 5 with Google Assistant
+
Array of accurate health sensors lifted from Fitbit
+
Same beloved design as past gens

Reasons to avoid

-
Battery life is only average for Wear OS
-
Unchanged CPU, sensors from PW2
-
Not as durable as GW7

The Android Central staff loves the Google Pixel Watch 3. Even though the Galaxy Watch 7 beats it in a few key areas, more of us wear Google's option than Samsung's. Why? It's partly because of its close integration with Pixel and Google Home devices, but I suspect it's mainly because it looks so much more stylish. Looks matter in a watch!

In my Pixel Watch 3 review, I called the upgraded display "the star of the show." Google removed the thick border wasting space on the Watch 2, with doubled brightness and a twice-as-smooth refresh rate. Just as important, it offered two size options for the first time. I prefer the 1.43-inch model because Wear OS 5 reflows content to take advantage of the extra space, but the 1.27-inch Watch 3 is still a major upgrade.

Otherwise, when I compared the Pixel Watch 3 vs. 2, I didn't find many differences besides minor boosts to Bluetooth, WiFi, and UWB. Most of the hardware and sensors remain the same; thankfully, we really liked the Pixel Watch 2 (aside from its display). And Wear OS 5 made the Pixel Watch 3 more efficient, so you can sometimes stretch it to almost two days per charge, on par with Samsung.

Should you choose the Pixel Watch 3 or Galaxy Watch 7? Samsung has a newer 3nm processor, more accurate dual-band GPS, and an extra year of Wear OS updates for a lower price, but without Fitbit integration and the Watch 3's more stylish look. And Google I/O made us excited to test out the new Wear OS build on the Watch 3 later this year.

You may also want to wait for the Pixel Watch 4, which should arrive by end of summer with a new Snapdragon chipset and Gemini integration while keeping the same general look as the Watch 3. But for now, the Watch 3 is a great option, and the upcoming Wear OS 6 update looks great on it!

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Google Pixel Watch 3 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

2 sizes, bright, LTPO support, no sapphire glass

★★★★☆

Design

Gorgeous and comfortable, though not durable and no premium materials

★★★★☆

Price

Price on par with "premium" watches; size or LTE boosts a little costly.

★★★☆☆

Performance

Snapdragon W5 is still fast, but a repeat from last year. 2GB RAM is plenty.

★★★★☆

Battery life

Solid 1.5 to 2 days of battery depending on the size

★★★☆☆

Health

Fitbit-brand sensors for total health summary.

★★★★★

Fitness

Fitbit Premium workouts, Daily Readiness, cardio load, other runner-focused tools; other sports don't get as much attention

★★★★☆

Software

Speedy Google-backed software updates with close Google app integration.

★★★★★

Best budget option

Amazfit Balance smartwatch

(Image credit: Namerah Saud Fatmi / Android Central)
Best budget option

Specifications

Display size: 1.5-inch AMOLED (480x480)
Processor: Unknown
Storage: 2.2GB
Battery life: 14 days (7 w/ heavy use)
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM)
LTE: 🚫
GPS: ✔️ (Dual-band)
NFC: ✔️ (Zepp Pay)
Sensors: HRM, SpO2
Weight (no strap): 35g

Reasons to buy

+
Vibrant always-on AMOLED display
+
2-week battery
+
Affordable
+
Bluetooth calls and Alexa support
+
Dual-band GPS and training algorithms

Reasons to avoid

-
No third-party apps
-
Too large for some
-
May not love the default nylon band

Most of the best Amazfit watches offer similar perks: bright AMOLED displays, long battery life, basic apps and notifications, and hundreds of sports modes paired with some AI insights. Out of all of them, our top recommendation is the Amazfit Balance, which lives up to its name and provides the best well-rounded experience.

Our Accessories editor Namerah Saud Fatmi reviewed the Amazfit Balance and praised the "mind-blowing battery" that lasts for at least two weeks with light use, giving you peace of mind compared to a Wear OS watch.

Of course, it lacks the apps or Google Assistant commands of a smarter Android watch, but the Balance still has Alexa voice commands, music storage, Bluetooth calling, continuous heart rate and stress data plus SpO2, dual-band GPS for workouts, and Zepp Health insights.

Compared to other Amazfit watches, it adds a few new tricks, too, like a Zepp Flow AI assistant using OpenAI's GPT-4o, Zepp Coach workout plans, and contactless payments. You can reply to messages using text-to-talk, or type out a response on the 1.5-inch, 1,500-nit display using a QWERTY keyboard.

Namerah did warn that the Balance can feel a bit big for smaller wrists, that she wishes it had Google Wallet instead of Zepp Pay, and that there was an LTE option. But ultimately, this is a great option if you're looking to save money and stop worrying about daily charges.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Amazfit Balance scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

High-res AMOLED, solid brightness, no smaller size option

★★★☆☆

Design

Classically stylish and slim but looks "comically big" on smaller wrists

★★★☆☆

Price

Very affordable for what it offers

★★★★★

Performance

No-name CPU with quick text replies and basic apps.

★★☆☆☆

Battery life

Two weeks per charge or 26 dual-band GPS hours

★★★★★

Health

HR, SpO2, stress, breathing rate, and sleep analysis, but no ECG

★★★★☆

Fitness

Dual-band GPS, PAI score, PeakBeats training effect, and Zepp Coach workout plans

★★★★☆

Software

Zepp OS is competent for the basics, but no Wear OS

★★☆☆☆

Best premium pick

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra sitting on a white counter, showing the Modern Minimalist watch face.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)
Best premium pick

Specifications

Display: 1.5-inch AMOLED (480x480)
Processor: Exynos W1000
Memory: 2GB + 32GB
Battery life: 60–72 hours
Water-resistant: ✔️ (10ATM / IP68)
LTE: ✔️
GPS: ✔️ (dual-band)
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, ECG, BIA, SpO2, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 60.5g

Reasons to buy

+
All the Watch 7's upgrades and software tricks
+
3,000-nit display
+
Built-in LTE and 85db siren
+
Extra durability
+
Third button shortcuts
+
Strong battery life

Reasons to avoid

-
Heavy, thick design
-
Much pricier than Watch 5 Pro
-
No Classic physical bezel or crown

After a Galaxy Watch Pro in 2022 and Classic in 2023, Samsung pivoted to the Galaxy Watch Ultra in 2024, with an Apple Watch Ultra 2-inspired design. It's not necessarily that different from the Galaxy Watch 7 in raw specs; it's primarily designed as an ultra-durable, long-lasting watch for those who prioritize style and battery life over comfort.

In my Galaxy Watch Ultra review, I highlighted some excellent perks like the excellent fitness accuracy, its better display brightness, and its "undoubtedly faster" performance compared to previous generations. I appreciated the extra Quick Button for shortcuts, though I wished that (A) it doubled as a crown to make up for the missing Classic bezel and (B) it let you add multiple shortcuts outside of workouts.

Like the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, the Watch Ultra has a 590mAh battery, larger than the 425mAh capacity found in the Watch 7 with a comparable 1.5-inch display. After some early battery drain issues, Samsung patched the Galaxy Watch Ultra, and now it consistently lasts 60+ hours with the always-on display feature active. It's not quite as long lived as our next pick, but it's noticeably better than the Watch 7.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra is often available at a steep discount these days, making it more reasonable to pay extra for the durable titanium case and extra brightness. You may want to wait for the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, which looks like an Ultra with a physical rotating bezel slapped on top. It'll have better controls, but allegedly has less battery capacity and measures much thicker. So the Ultra is still an attractive option.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

Bright and gorgeous, but no small option.

★★★★☆

Design

Rugged titanium, useful third button, and stylishly distinct. Some will miss the Classic bezel or feel the weight.

★★★★☆

Price

More expensive than any other Android or Galaxy Watch by far; find a trade-in deal.

★☆☆☆☆

Performance

Top-tier performance, though no faster than Watch 7.

★★★★★

Battery life

60–100 hours based on settings, or 16 with GPS; consistent and reliable.

★★★★★

Health

Like Watch 7, offers thorough and accurate health data, with only a couple duds like BIA and AGEs Index.

★★★★☆

Fitness

Performed on par with a Garmin for GPS and HR accuracy; Energy Score is useful if you don't mind sleeping with it.

★★★★☆

Software

Long and consistent Wear OS software support.

★★★★★

Best battery life

A OnePlus Watch 3 with a green watchface

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)
Best battery life

Specifications

Display: 1.5-inch AMOLED (466×466)
Processor: Snapdragon W5 + BES 2800
Memory: 2GB + 32GB
Battery life: Up to 120 hours
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM + IP68)
LTE: 🚫
GPS: ✔️ (Dual-band)
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, SpO2, ECG, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 49.7g

Reasons to buy

+
5-day battery and sub-hour recharge
+
Stylish titanium bezel and working crown
+
Brighter, smoother, DC-dimmed display
+
Improved HR data and new skin temp
+
Better OHealth companion app

Reasons to avoid

-
Only one (very large size)
-
ECG, LTE not available in U.S.
-
Fewer & slower updates than Google, Samsung

The OnePlus Watch 3 has the best battery life in a Wear OS watch, easily lasting between four and six days per charge and then recharging in an insane 30–40 minutes, so you almost never need to take it off.

While the OnePlus Watch 2 and Watch 2R had strong battery life, the Watch 3 uses a denser silicon-carbon battery for a further capacity boost. And this model made several key improvements over its flawed predecessors.

The rotating crown is no longer decorative, offering useful controls. The new 1.5-inch LTPO AMOLED display hits a much brighter 2,200 nits but uses flicker-free DC dimming to spare your eyes. And while the Watch 2 had a slow coprocessor that struggled with RTOS tasks, the new 6nm coprocessor has a 200% CPU boost that handles background tasks like sensor readings and notifications without the same bugginess.

Our OnePlus Watch 3 reviewer had tons of praise for the overall experience. It's much more accurate for workout and step tracking, it delivers on OnePlus's battery estimates for real-life use, and it has the "best digital crown on any smartwatch" with excellent haptics.

But he did complain that the Watch 3 can feel a bit heavy if you're not used to Ultra-sized watches. We're still waiting on a smaller OnePlus Watch 3 Mini. And OnePlus will only give the Watch 3 two Wear OS updates — less support than Google and Samsung offer.

Still, this is a great option for fans of OnePlus phones, or Android users in general that need longer battery life than Samsung and Google can offer. And now that OnePlus has dropped the price from $500 to $350, it's more tempting than before.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
OnePlus Watch 3 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

We like its brightness and smooth, flicker-free tech; there should be a smaller size option

★★★★☆

Design

Military-grade ruggedness and stylish titanium/steel chassis will draw eye, but too heavy for many

★★★☆☆

Price

OnePlus has hiked the price to $500, making it more expensive than most non-Ultra watches

★★☆☆☆

Performance

Same CPU, storage as other Wear OS watches, but efficient coprocessor beats the competition

★★★★☆

Battery life

Up to 120 hours, lasts longer — and charges faster — than any other Wear OS watch by far

★★★★★

Health

More accurate and less bare-bones for health and fitness data, but no ECG in U.S., OHealth has improved recently

★★★★☆

Fitness

Offers dual-band GPS, delivered very accurate workout data in our review tests

★★★★☆

Software

Will receive two Wear OS updates and three years of security updates; offers similar Wear OS 5 experience to Pixel Watches

★★★☆☆

Best last-gen option

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)
Best last-gen option

Specifications

Display: 1.3- (432 x 432) or 1.5-inch (480 x 480) AMOLED
Processor: Exynos W930
Memory: 2GB + 32GB
Battery life: 40 hours
Water resistance: ✔️ (5ATM / IP68)
LTE: ✔️, optional
GPS: ✔️
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, ECG, BIA, SpO2, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 28.7g / 33.3g

Reasons to buy

+
Same display, design, battery, memory, and sensors as Watch 7
+
Often available for significantly less
+
Due to receive another three years of Wear OS updates and security patches
+
Our former pick for best Android watch
+
Has a Classic option available

Reasons to avoid

-
Older Exynos with less storage than Watch 7
-
No dual-band GPS or newer heart rate sensors
-
May run out of stock soon

Even though the Galaxy Watch 7 supplanted the Watch 6 for best Android watch, the 2023 watch still claimed that spot for a year, for good reason. My Galaxy Watch 6 review ran through its comfortable design, fast performance, respectable battery life, and streamlined software.

The Galaxy Watch 6 was available at impressively low prices during last year's holiday sales, but Samsung is running low on stock as it transitions to the Watch 7. If you can find one for significantly cheaper than the Watch 7, it's not a major downgrade. The design, displays, protection, connectivity, and software are largely unchanged, and the performance gap isn't that big.

That said, I did have some complaints with the last-gen model's health sensors and GPS accuracy, and Samsung prioritized these fixes in the 2024 model, improving heart rate accuracy and adding dual-band GPS tracking that works as well as a Garmin watch. And the Watch 6's Exynos CPU has three fewer Cortex cores than the Watch 7, so it's less likely to handle demanding Wear OS tasks as quickly moving forward. The Watch 7 remains my top recommendation for a reason.

The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic is a fan favorite for many Samsung watch fans thanks to its rotating bezel. But since the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic should arrive in a few months, you may want to stay patient a bit longer.

Still, the Galaxy Watch 6 series is available now, has years of Wear OS updates left, and could save you a bunch of money with the right deal.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

Same excellent display tech as Watch 7

★★★★★

Design

Plain appearance, but you can upgrade to Watch 6 Classic for style

★★★★☆

Price

Frequently discounted to new lows

★★★★☆

Performance

Last-gen Exynos CPU but plenty of RAM

★★★★☆

Battery life

Adequate 40-hour lifespan, not quite as efficient as Watch 7

★★★☆☆

Health

Mostly same sensor suite as Watch 6, but fewer HR LEDs and colors

★★★☆☆

Fitness

Will get new Energy score, but not new dual-band GPS or extra HR LEDs for accuracy.

★★★☆☆

Software

Three Wear OS updates and years of security updates left.

★★★★☆

Best for fitness

Widgets view on the Garmin Venu 3 showing steps, intensity minutes, and heart rate

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)
Best fitness smartwatch

Specifications

Display: 1.2- (390x390) or 1.4-inch (454x454)
Processor: Unknown
Storage: 8GB
Battery life: 14 days; 5 days with AOD
Water resistant: ✔️ (5ATM)
LTE: 🚫
GPS: ✔️ (All-systems GNSS)
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, SpO2, ECG, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 30g

Reasons to buy

+
Two weeks of battery life
+
Bluetooth calls and Google Assistant support
+
AMOLED touchscreen and button controls
+
Garmin suite of fitness software is free
+
Sleep Coaching and ECG app

Reasons to avoid

-
No third-party apps, messaging
-
Missing some Garmin Forerunner tools

You can't discuss the best Android watches and not mention Garmin. Frankly, any of the best Garmin watches could be in the conversation to join this list, but I chose the Venu 3 — not just because it's #1 on that list — but because it's the closest Garmin has to a mainstream smartwatch.

As outlined in my Garmin Venu 3 review, it has tools unavailable on most other Garmin watches: a mic and speaker for Bluetooth calls and passthrough voice commands, an ECG sensor, skin temperature data, a Sleep Coach, a keyboard for texting, and a new UI that makes apps more accessible. That makes it less of an adjustment if you're used to "regular" watches.

As for why Garmin watches belong on this list, it's all about the fitness tools. It tells you how fit you are and how much your Body Battery has recharged based on HRV and sleep data. It lets you follow a Garmin Coach training calendar or see daily auto-suggested workouts based on your VO2 Max. After a run, you'll see what kind of training effect it had and how long before your body recovers. The above watches have some of these tricks, but not to the same extent as Garmin.

The Venu 3 itself lasts a ridiculous 2 weeks per charge, or 26 hours of GPS tracking, whereas your typical Android watch will die much more quickly. It has a thinner, steel-edged design compared to most plastic-heavy Garmins, with a bright AMOLED display. It's not the "smartest" watch, in that it has no third-party apps and doesn't communicate with Health Sync, but it's still a great option for athletes.

The actual "best" Garmin watch would be the long-lived Fenix 8, but since that costs over twice as much, it's harder to recommend. You could also wait for the Garmin Venu 4; Garmin usually releases new models on two-year schedules, so we'd expect the next version by late summer 2025.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Garmin Venu 3 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

2 sizes, high-res with decent brightness

★★★★☆

Design

Comfortable and thin with three buttons for nav and shortcuts and a steel bezel

★★★★☆

Price

On the expensive side compared to other picks; you're mainly paying for health & fitness, not smarts

★★☆☆☆

Performance

Decent enough speeds but definitely optimized for long battery life

★★☆☆☆

Battery life

Longer battery life than any Wear OS watch by far

★★★★★

Health

Accurate HR and sleep with skin temp, capable of continuous SpO2 for jet lag tracking

★★★★☆

Fitness

Training guidance and fitness coaching, though not quite as advanced as a Garmin Forerunner.

★★★★☆

Software

Only a few third-party apps like Spotify and Komoot

★★☆☆☆

Best health tracking

Use Google Wallet on Fitbit Sense 2

(Image credit: Android Central)
Best for health tracking

Specifications

Display: 1.58-inch AMOLED (336 x 336)
Processor: Unknown
Storage: N/A
Battery life: 6+ days
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM)
LTE: 🚫
GPS: ✔️
NFC: ✔️
Sensors: HRM, SpO2, ECG, cEDA, skin temp
Weight (no strap): 37.64g

Reasons to buy

+
Built-in GPS, HRM, SpO2
+
Temperature sensor
+
Continuous stress testing
+
Google Maps/ Wallet
+
Wear OS-lite interface

Reasons to avoid

-
No music storage
-
No Google Assistant

The Fitbit Sense 2 tracks your heart rate, heart rate variance (HRV), possible atrial fibrillation (AFib), blood oxygen, sleep quality, electrodermal body response (cEDA), stress levels (HRV), and skin temperature. When it first launched in 2022, these were all cutting-edge features; since then, Google coopted Fitbit tech for the superior Pixel Watch 2 and 3, and the Sense 2 became less special.

As someone who owned the original Sense, I appreciated how the Fitbit Sense 2 took advantage of the Fitbit-Google acquisition to add Google Maps and Wallet, as well as use a Wear OS-lite UI that was more intuitive than Fitbit's original OS and the new physical side button instead of the finicky capacitive button that I hated.

At the same time, I agreed with our Fitbit Sense 2 reviewer's frustrated response to the newer watch: Google cut out several smart features, disabling the wifi antenna, removing music storage and playback, cutting out limited third-party apps, and removing Google Assistant support. It was as if Google decided any smarts that weren't Google-branded weren't worth including.

So why include the Sense 2 on this list? Simply put, the fact that it has a bright, skinny AMOLED design and a six-day battery life, and that it's frequently found on sale these days for far less than the Pixel Watch series. If you want the health tools and Fitbit workouts of the Pixel Watch but a better battery life, the Fitbit Sense 2 is a very reasonable alternative. You'll have to accept the lack of smarts and phone integration, but that won't bother everyone.

Since Google has essentially confirmed that there won't be any new Fitbit-branded watches, the Sense 2 is the best option left for the brand for the foreseeable future.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Fitbit Sense 2 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

One squircle display size with average brightness

★★★☆☆

Design

Comfortably lightweight, but depends on whether you like squircles or not

★★★★☆

Price

Expensive (esp. with Premium sub) for what it offers, so find a sale

★★★☆☆

Performance

Optimized for battery life, but good enough for Google apps

★★☆☆☆

Battery life

Six-day battery is respectable, though GPS battery life is shorter-lived

★★★★☆

Health

Lives up to Fitbit's reputation with thoroughness and accuracy.

★★★★★

Fitness

Fitbit's AI analysis and workouts are quite handy, if more geared towards indoor workouts.

★★★★☆

Software

Unless you care about Google Maps, the Sense 2 software experience is very limited by design.

★★☆☆☆

Best hybrid

The Withings ScanWatch 2 on the author's wrist, showing the Settings menu on the small OLED screen.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)
Best hybrid

Specifications

Display: 0.63-inch (282ppi) grayscale OLED
Processor: Unknown
Storage: N/A
Battery life: Up to 30 days
Water-resistant: ✔️ (5ATM)
LTE: 🚫
GPS: 🚫 (connected only)
NFC: 🚫
Sensors: HRM, SpO2, ECG, 24/7 skin temp
Weight (no strap): 34.6g / 52.6g

Reasons to buy

+
A design that will appeal to traditional aesthetics
+
Sends a wealth of info to Withings app (paired with your smart scale data)
+
Excellent battery life
+
Range of health and sleep insights

Reasons to avoid

-
No contactless payments, GPS, apps
-
Steel makes it feel a bit heavy
-
You'll have to get used to small grayscale display

I'm rounding out this Android smartwatch list by focusing on hybrids. Most smartwatches look good to tech geeks but won't appeal to fans of traditional watches; I previously gave this slot to the Garmin Instinct Crossover for fans of rugged Casio-style timepieces, but I more recently reviewed the Withings ScanWatch 2, and while it certainly isn't perfect, it's a much better option for traditional style paired with useful health insights.

Winner of my informal smartwatch beauty pageant by a landslide, the Withings ScanWatch 2 disguises its small grayscale display so that it's only visible when you lift your wrist in response to a vibration. The tiny cutout is too small to show much information, but it's enough to give you the gist and decide if it's worth pulling out your phone or not.

Packed with health sensors, the ScanWatch 2 will fill your Withings app with data about your resting heart rate, sleep zones, body temperature changes, blood oxygen, and cycles, with a few other metrics like overnight HRV and respiratory rate supposedly coming soon. It also has some basic fitness tracking and accurate HR data during workouts, but the ScanWatch 2 is better suited for passive health tracking and ECG readings.

I wasn't the biggest fan of navigating through menus on the tiny screen, but it's not something that should come up very often. Buy any of the watches above for a proper touch-enabled smartwatch; buy the ScanWatch 2 if you want to shed your life of another distracting AMOLED screen and just want a watch that'll last a few weeks to a month per charge and keep you generally informed — while looking stylish.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Withings ScanWatch 2 scorecard

Attribute

Quick look

Score

Display

Tiny grayscale OLED is readable but an obvious downgrade

★☆☆☆☆

Design

Much more attractive than any normal smartwatch, especially if you shell out for the ScanWatch Nova or Brilliant

★★★★★

Price

A little expensive, and Withings will push optional subscriptions, but still very reasonable

★★★☆☆

Performance

Doesn't have traditional apps

N/A

Battery life

Excellent battery life, even with constant health data

★★★★★

Health

Tracks wide range of sleep and health data; we experienced some sleep-tracking inaccuracies and a few promised features haven't arrived yet

★★★☆☆

Fitness

Only gives you a few basic sports modes and no built-in GPS, so you'll need your phone.

★★☆☆☆

Software

Again, no apps, NFC, or general "smarts" apply with this hybrid watch

N/A

Other watches we tested and recommend

Our picks for the best Android watches focus as much on balance as possible, because we can't know what your priorities are. You might choose the Galaxy Watch Ultra or OnePlus Watch 3 for battery life, but otherwise they bring very different things to the table. And we have other watches in mind that last even longer than both, but do other things worse.

That's why we're including this section on picks that didn't quite make the cut, but still qualify as great Android watches in their own right. They're all devices that I or my colleagues have tested and liked, but may fall short to the above picks in key ways. Still, don't sleep on these watches!

FAQ

What brand makes the best Android smartwatches?

Why you can trust Android Central Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 (left, silver) and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (right, black) side-by-side

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Ultra side-by-side (Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

Samsung has the most picks on this list for a reason. You can choose between the premium Watch Ultra, all-rounder Watch 7, or affordable Watch FE based on your budget, and get an excellent level of value from even the cheap models.

They get more software support than any other Wear OS watch brand, and since Samsung is the most popular Android brand worldwide, the Galaxy Watch statistically is most likely to sync with your current Android phone with exclusive features.

We also like Google and OnePlus for quality Wear OS software, and brands like Garmin for those who use Android but prefer battery life and fitness coaching to responsive messaging or phone-watch app connectivity. But if we can only pick one brand, it's Samsung.

How do I choose smartwatch size?

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 Classic (top) and Galaxy Watch Ultra (bottom) sitting next to each other.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

We've included the weights for our top picks in the specs tables above. Brands measure the weight without the strap to make their watches seem lighter than they are, and every gram matters when you're wearing a smartwatch all day and night.

Several of our top picks ship in two display sizes. While the weight gap between the two Galaxy Watch 7s (5g) and Pixel Watch 3s (6g) isn't that big at first glance, larger models sometimes have larger bands, which can add even more weight. You'll have to weigh whether you can handle a heavier watch in exchange for easier readibility for your notifications.

If you like a larger watch but are concerned about the weight, you can offset it a bit by choosing a nylon strap instead of a fluoroelastomer or metal one.

What features should I look for in a smartwatch?

A pile of Wear OS watches: The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, 6, 6 Classic, and 5 Pro; the Google Pixel Watch 3 and 2; and the OnePlus Watch 2R.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

These are some key smartwatch features that you won't see by default, and may have to go out of your way to find:

  • More than one day of battery life
  • NFC
  • Third-party app support
  • Fitness training apps or plans
  • LTE support
  • Passive AFib detection
  • Fall detection
  • Multiple tracking satellites
  • MIL-STD-810G protection
  • Specific controls (e.g., crown, rotating bezel, multiple buttons)
  • Specific sensors (e.g., temperature, gyroscope, altimeter)

Of these, we have specific guides on the best smartwatches with LTE so you can make calls or check in without your phone on hand, or the best smartwatches for GPS tracking that offer more than the standard watch antenna that can only follow one satellite at a time.

You'll want to check if your watch supports tap-to-pay, or will register if you've fallen while working out or walking around your home. Folks with heart issues will also want to make sure you can check for irregular heart rhythm, either actively with an ECG or passively with a standard optical HRM.

Also, check the smartwatches' specifications page before buying to make sure you know what you're getting. For example, if you don't see an altimeter, that means your watch can't tell how many flights of stairs you've climbed or properly judge how hard you're working out.

How much battery life do I need in a smartwatch?

Detailed battery life statistics on a OnePlus Watch 3

(Image credit: Nicholas Sutrich / Android Central)

Some users can't stand having to take their watch off every 24 hours to charge it. Luckily, there are many multi-day battery life picks on this list.

The Galaxy Watch 7 and Pixel Watch 3 typically last between 1.5 and 2 days, with features like AOD, voice-activated assistant, and music streaming making them trend down towards daily charges. Even though they're the best Android watches in some areas, they're not the best for battery.

The Galaxy Watch Ultra gives you three-day battery life if you're willing to spend a premium. But you can spend significantly less on a Ticwatch Pro 5 and get comparable performance, or better performance with a OnePlus Watch 3.

Of course, three to five days isn't good enough for some people! If that's the case, then you don't want a traditional smartwatch with a full-fledged OS. You want an efficient fitness watch from Garmin, Fitbit, COROS, Polar, Suunto, or other fitness watch brands. These can last anywhere from a week (the Fitbit Sense 2) to two weeks (Garmin Venu 3), or sometimes even months with something like the Garmin Instinct 2X Solar.

Do smartwatches have a monthly fee?

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Watch 5 Pro

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

With a "normal" Android smartwatch, no, you shouldn't have to pay any post-purchase fees. But there are plenty of subscriptions associated with smartwatches.

First, if you buy an LTE version of a smartwatch, then you'll need to add your watch to your cellular plan to make it independent from your phone. The cost for this will vary by carrier, but $10–15 per month is fairly standard in the U.S.

Next, many smartwatches have fitness subscriptions, most notoriously Fitbit Premium on the Pixel Watch 3 and Sense 2. After your six-month free trial ends, you'll have to pay $10 per month for that.

Some of our other picks have optional fitness subscriptions: Garmin watches have Connect Plus, Amazfit watches have Zepp Fitness and Zepp Aura, and Withings has Withings Plus.

Lastly, Samsung has frequently warned that its AI insights are only free through the end of 2025. So it's possible that Galaxy Watches will get their own subscription starting next year.

How we test

Why you can trust Android Central

☑️ One of the oldest and most trusted Android sites on the web
☑️ Over 15 years of product testing
☑️ Thousands of products reviewed and tested since 2007
☑️ Dozens of smartwatches, fitness trackers, and smart rings tested every year by our team

Android Central has been reviewing smartwatches since the original Samsung Gear series a decade ago. Since then, we've taken watches as seriously as phones; we know that smartwatches are both an extension of the Android experience and an important standalone device.

That's why we take weeks with any wearable before offering a "final" review and recommendation. For example, we published an "initial" Pixel Watch 3 review in early September with weeks of impressions, but we didn't publish our "final" Watch 3 review until late October, once we could provide long-term impressions and catch subtle issues.

With each smartwatch, we test its performance speed, battery life for both casual and active use, and its latest software and apps.

Since I took over as Wearables Editor, I've done my best to emulate the testing-heavy approach of popular fitness sites and YouTubers. I never trust the health and fitness data by default: I use chest or arm straps to test heart rate, a pedometer for step count, and multiple dual-band GPS watches to compare accuracy.

I truly mean it when I say that I won't recommend a device without first making sure that it's trustworthy, and I'll never hold back on a device's faults just because it's a popular brand.

Michael L Hicks
Senior Editor, Wearables & AR/VR

Michael is Android Central's resident expert on wearables and fitness. Before joining Android Central, he freelanced for years at Techradar, Wareable, Windows Central, and Digital Trends. Channeling his love of running, he established himself as an expert on fitness watches, testing and reviewing models from Garmin, Fitbit, Samsung, Apple, COROS, Polar, Amazfit, Suunto, and more.

With contributions from