LG vs. iPhone, Samsung vs. Nexus. Four cameras enter — how many will leave?
We've recently had some new entrants in the venue of "excellent smartphone cameras", so it's fitting that we take a few minutes to do a proper camera showdown between them. So here we go: the Apple iPhone 6s versus the LG Nexus 5X versus the Samsung Galaxy S6 versus the LG G4.
Why these phones?

The iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus have the same sensors and lenses. The only difference between the two is optical stabilization. Seeing as the the Galaxy S6 and LG G4 are equipped with OIS cameras, it was only fair to opt for the iPhone 6s Plus over its non-stabilized smaller sibling (not to mention that it's closer in size screen-wise to most flagship Android phones).
When it comes to Samsung, the Korean manufacturer opted to install the same camera module in the larger Galaxy Note 5 as they did in the earlier-launched Galaxy S6. In fact, each of the flagship Galaxy phones launched this year (S6, S6 edge, S6 edge+, and Note 5) has the exact same camera.
Likewise between the LG G4 and the just-released LG V10 — exact same camera.
It's the same story again when it comes to choosing between the LG Nexus 5X and the Huawei Nexus 6P — the 6P may be larger, faster, and better-built, but the camera is exactly the same as in the 5X.
How we shot
Over the course of a few days we took these four phones to various locations to shoot in various settings. Each was left in full auto mode with automatic HDR enabled. All photos were shot hand-held (as you do with a phone). The only alterations made to photos were to resize where applicable.

Yes, the Galaxy S6 offers a limited manual mode and the G4 has the option to go full manual and spit out highly-tweakable RAW files, but that's not the point of this comparison. The truth is, most people that buy these phones aren't going to bother with manual mode — it's there for the professionals. You could download an app for the iPhone or Nexus that provides many of those controls as well, but again, that's not what the average person is going to do.
If you're the type that wants to shoot with manual control of the focus point, white balance, and the like, you already know what phone you want. In fact, you probably don't want a phone at all for photos — you want a real camera with real controls. We're not professional photographers here, and we don't expect you to be either.
Spec showdown
Before we get into it, a comparison of the camera specifications for each of these phones:
| Category | Samsung Galaxy S6 | Apple iPhone 6s | LG G4 | LG Nexus 5X |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megapixels | 16MP | 12MP | 16MP | 12.3MP |
| Resolution | 5312x2988 | 4032x3024 | 5312x2988 | 4000x2992 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 | 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.6" | 1/3" | 1/2.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12μm | 1.22μm | 1.12μm | 1.55μm |
| Aperture | ƒ/1.9 | ƒ/2.2 | ƒ/1.8 | ƒ/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 28mm | 29mm | 28mm | 29mm |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony | LG | Sony |
| Additional Features | Real-time HDR | Dual-LED flash, hybrid IR filter | Laser autofocus, color spectrum sensor | Laser autofocus, dual-LED flash |
But what does all that mean?

- Megapixels are shorthand for the total number of pixels that are located on the sensor. The pixels are arrayed in a grid, with "1 megapixel" being "one million pixels". So a 12.3MP camera like the LG Nexus 5X has 12.3 million pixels on it. More megapixels mean a "larger" image, in that you can zoom in closer without losing detail, but they don't mean a wider image. A 5MP photo might look fine on your phone or even your computer, but blown up and printed as a poster it will probably look terrible.
- Resolution is essentially another way of looking at megapixels — it's the horizontal pixel count and the vertical pixel count. Multiply them, you get the total number of pixels.
- Aspect ratio is an abstraction of that count, reducing it to its simplest fractional form. This gives you an idea of how "wide" an image will be (in landscape). 16:9 has become a standard resolution for a lot of things these days — almost every smartphone has a 16:9 ratio display, your TV almost certainly does, and most computer monitors are 16:9. If it's "1080p" or "4K", it's 16:9. 4:3, on the other hand, is a more traditional aspect ratio, inherited from the days of film photography and pre-HD televisions. 4:3 cameras aren't quite as wide as their 16:9 compatriots, but they're also capturing more on the vertical axis when shooting in landscape.
- Sensor size is the physical size of the sensor. This is where things start to get hinky — more megapixels doesn't necessarily mean that you'll have a larger sensor, it might just be smaller pixels crammed into the same space. Measured as a fraction, the larger the number (i.e. the smaller the denominator), the larger the sensor. In this case, the Nexus 5X has the largest sensor of the bunch, while the iPhone 6s has the smallest.
- Pixel size is the collision of megapixels and sensor size, and where the rubber truly meets the road. This is the measurement of the actual width of the light-sensing pixels on the sensor, and because we're talking about putting millions of pixels on a plate that's barely the size of the nail on your pinky finger, they're tiny. We measure them in micrometers (μm) — one millionth of a meter, 1/10,000th of a centimeter, or 1/25400th of an inch. These things are tiny. The upshot is, the bigger your pixel, the more light it can collect, and the more light it can collect, the better quality photo you should be able to generate (in theory).

- Aperture is the size of the opening through which light flows to the sensor, again expressed as a fraction. The larger the opening, the more light, and thus the larger the fraction (the smaller the denominator), the larger the aperture. The side-effect of a wider aperture is that it also reduces the depth of field for a photo. This is the plane of the photo that is in focus, versus objects in the foreground or background that are not. The wider your aperture, the shorter the depth of field and the further things beyond that plane are, the more blurred they will be.
- Focal length is an old-school measurement of the length from the lens to the sensor (or film), but in practice it's a measure of how "wide" you should expect your photos to be, or the field of view. Except it's an inverse measurement — the longer the focal length, the narrower the photo. And obviously they've scaled it down to smartphone sizes — there's not an inch of space between the sensor and the lens, unless your phone is hilariously thick. Think of it as looking through a tube. If that tube has been cut very short, you'll still see a lot of what's on the other side. But if it's longer, you'll see much less through the far away opening. Practically every modern smartphone has a focal length of between 28mm and 30mm.
The Photos
What follows will be grids of images in this order: Galaxy S6, iPhone 6s, LG G4, and then Nexus 5X. You can click/tap on any image to view the full size.
Indoors
When it comes to indoor shots, none of these cameras will disappoint (and that's a theme that will repeat itself time and time again through this comparison). But, there are differences to be noted. The shot looking out the windows triggered HDR on all four phones and produced a balanced photo for each, but the Galaxy S6 and LG G4 both produced photos that were closer to what we saw with our own eyes (as HDR is meant to do). These two phones also better handled the reflected backlighting with Lego Wall-E, whereas the iPhone 6s blew out the backlight in trying to balance our adorable little robot.
Daylight
The daylight photos revealed something that we'd noticed but not quite registered with the indoor photos: the Nexus 5X was shooting on the dark side. That made the colors richer, yes, but put side-by-side with the other phones, it just looked dark.
Interestingly, the LG G4's shots of the flame-red autumn tree turned out more orange than we anticipated, given the fancy color spectrum sensor at play on this device. Indeed, when viewing on the phone itself with its touted "Quantum Display" that's supposed to better render colors like reds, it looked quite red. But when we put it side-by-side and viewed it on our calibrated computer monitor, instead we get orange while the other photos from the other phones look expectedly red. The iPhone 6s did have a bit of orange to it as well, but nowhere near as pronounced as the G4's.
Additionally, the automatic HDR fired on both the Galaxy S6 and the G4, but the G4's delay in taking the three-consecutive shots meant that the constant light breeze moved the leaves around, creating a double-impression type of effect you can see in the 100% crop.
Dusk
Dusk saw the first truly challenging conditions for these phones. Daylight and indoors are no problem for a modern flagship smartphone, no matter the operating system. But dusk, with its varying hues and brightnesses poses difficulties that only grow as the sun dips further behind the horizon. In the early hours of dusk where the sun is near the horizon the Galaxy S6 produced tones that were surprisingly muted but, as it got dark, the photos became more saturated.
The iPhone 6s photos during dusk were the closest to the actual colors of the scenes, but as it got darker the comparatively narrow aperture and small sensor struggled to expose the photos as brightly. Conversely, the Galaxy S6 and LG G4 started to overexpose, leading to photos that, while incredibly colorful and "punchy", blew out the brigher spots of the images. That trend continued into the nighttime photos.
Nighttime
In these nighttime shots the LG G4 turned into a serious disappointment. Photos that looked fine on the phone were seriously blown out when viewed off the phone. The bridge towers and city, for instance, were nowhere near as brightly lit as the G4 portrayed them. The closeup of the light on the bridge was similarly blown out. What's most distressing about those is that this was shot in HDR mode, which should have alleviated any blow-outs like that by properly exposing the bright, dark, and mid-tones. But it didn't — instead we got an entire photo that was almost comically overexposed — the city looks about how our eyes see it, but the bridge and the lights on it are brighter than bright. At least the lens flare is pretty.
The Nexus 5X, iPhone 6s, and Galaxy S6 all handled the night shots with aplomb, offering photos that were smartly exposed, sharp, and appropriately colorful.
Motion
As the saying goes, "The best phone is the one one you have on you." That's to say that it doesn't matter if you have a fancy DSLR with a 20MP sensor and 45mm prime lens at home if it's not in your hands right now to capture the scene before you. Unless you're engaging in controlled-conditions studio photography, you're engaging in an art of capturing a fleeting moment, be it the look on your friend's face or the beauty of the sunset or that crazy man raging about the Illuminati on the street corner. Photography is about capturing that moment, and more often that not that moment involves movement, which you want to be frozen in time. For that, you want a camera that can focus quickly and accurately and take a photo with as short a shutter speed as possible.
While modern smartphones don't actually have a physical shutter, the less time that is spent collecting photons on the sensor, the less time there is for the subject of your photo to move. In that regard, each of these phones did fine in capturing the rapid movement of the jets in the fountain, but upon close inspection it's the Nexus 5X that took the sharpest (and therefore fastest) photo here. With water spraying in every direction, there's hardly a hint of movement in the drops and jets. It's as if it was frozen in time.
Detail
Fine detail is where having a higher megapixel count comes in most useful. With more pixels to work with, you can "zoom" in closer without losing detail. And it's here that the strength of the 16MP sensors in the Galaxy S6 and LG G4 comes to the fore. In these shots the two phones can not only crop tighter, they also retain more sharpness while doing so. The iPhone 6s struggled here, but the Nexus 5X with its wide open aperture and large pixels was able to still collect a sharp shot of the rain-soaked Bearcat Band and fans, even if it wasn't as large of a photo as the Galaxy S6 or G4 produced.
Macro
The Nexus 5X also excelled at macro photography, though none of the phones particularly faired poorly. The iPhone had the most difficulty focusing up close, but still produced respectable results. Here the Nexus 5X and Galaxy S6 were stand-out cameras, offering crisp and bright photos with a spectacular depth of field.
Panorama
When it comes to panoramas, nobody has yet to match the quality of the iPhone's output. It's easy to make a panorama — swipe to the right screen in the camera app. Tap, and start spinning your phone. Samsung has tried to duplicate and improve on the experience to great success, but it was still a bit on the fussy side to use. LG's panorama implementation is something of a step behind, awkwardly compressing the edges of the panoramas we took. It's as if they're trying to preserve the integrity of straight lines versus a true 1:1 panorama as Apple and Samsung offer.
The Nexus 5X with Android 6.0 Marshmallow, on the other hand, still uses the default Google camera app with its single-photo-a-time post-stitching panorama implementation. The result is that panoramas with any motion end up with awkward panorama artifacts. It's a shame Google's not improved on their app yet — it's great for capturing nature, but it's no good for capturing life.
For darker panoramas, the Galaxy S6 and Nexus 5X produced bright panoramas — far brighter than the reality of the scene. The S6 and G4's files were enormous, but a lot of the detail those images should have shown was lost in motion blur. So while they've replicated the iPhone experience of taking a panorama, they've yet to duplicate the results. The dusk panorama from the iPhone turned out crisp but with disappointingly muted colors. But for the most accurate panorama, the one that best captured the wash of color that was the sky and the city and the river, that was the LG G4.
User Interface
For all the talk about what kind of photos these phones take, let's take a moment to look at how all of them actually take photos.
More or less everybody (except for Motorola) has boiled down their camera interface to one simple design: big viewfinder dominating the display, shutter button centered on the bottom/right side, quick access to the last photos taken right by the shutter.
Samsung's camera interface is equal parts simple and confusing. It has quick controls on one end and a shutter button, video record button, and front/rear camera button with easy reach on the other end. But then there are three more control options — an arrow, a gear, and a button that says Mode. While you might think the arrow is to get you to more quick toggles, all it does is collapse the quick toggles (but still shows the icons when you've activated something like HDR or the flash — but you can't do anything with those icons until you expand the menu again).
The gear icon offers access to a slew of additional settings, and it's the mode button that lets you switch between what are still probably too many camera modes: auto, pro, selective focus, panorama, slow motion, fast motion, and virtual shot. And then there's the option to download even more camera modes from Samsung, including "food shot" and "sports shot" and "beauty face". While we appreciate the flexibility and customizability offered, in typical Samsung fashion it's a daunting amount of choice that might be better solved with more intelligent software.

Apple's interface is the most straightforward, with each mode accessible by swiping left or right across the preview, with what you'll get in each direction clearly explained in easy-to-understand words (Video, Slo-mo, Photo, Square, Pano, etc.). The icons to toggle settings at the top are similarly self-explanatory, and those that aren't (like the Live Photos button in the center) become so once you tap them and they tell you what's going on.
LG's G4 was famous for bringing full manual controls to the smartphone, but the default camera interface is relatively simple, and rather similar to Samsung's and Apple's. But unlike Samsung, tapping the gear icon for additional settings doesn't drop you out of the viewfinder, it instead overlays the settings as rows of menus right by the icon. Where LG gets confusing, though, is between the mode button and the three dots overflow button. Mode lets you switch between taking "dual" photos (overlaying one small photo onto a larger photo), panoramas, and auto (i.e. standard) photos. The overflow button switches you between Simple (no controls, just tap the screen to focus and capture), Auto (default with a shutter button and a few controls), and Manual (every control conceivable) modes. So really they're both mode buttons, and despite having owned a G4 for months, I'm still not used to the distinction.
The Nexus 5X camera app is the Google Camera app, and it's the most barebones of them all. On one end you've got a shutter button, last photo preview, and a button to switch cameras (which is abstract but clear enough, we suppose), there's a small set of controls to toggle the time, HDR, and flash, and a hamburger button to access just four options: Photo Sphere, Panorama, Lens Blur (which is fake lens blur but generally passable), and Settings. Wait, how do you switch to video? You swipe right across the screen — that's what the two dots at the bottom are meant to show; left side is photos, right side is video. But if you don't know where to look, how to switch, or worse, what you just triggered by an errant swipe across the display, is not immediately obvious.

Each phone also has a quick shortcut to get to the camera. The latest generation of Samsung Galaxy phones (S6 and newer), the iPhones, and the Nexus phones all have a quick shortcut on the lock screen — swipe up from the bottom right corner and you'll launch straight into the camera, bypassing any security you have enabled, but also keeping the rest of the phone locked down until you do enter your code or scan your fingerprint. Oddly, LG opted to leave that shortcut out of the latest devices.
The Android phones we looked at here do each offer a hardware shortcut to get to the camera, but each is different. On the Samsung phones you can double click the home button from anywhere, even when the display's off, to launch straight into the camera, though we found that thanks to the button's large size and forward-facing location we were too often activating the camera in our pocket (even when we weren't the crazy guy walking around with 4 phones). The Nexus phones let you double click the power button in the same manner — display off or on, no matter the app, to open the camera. Samsung's was easier to use when we wanted it — the home button doubles as the fingerprint sensor to unlock the phone anyway, so our thumb was typically already there — but that's not to say the Nexus power button option was bad.
LG's hardware camera shortcut is on the back, exactly where you find all of the hardware buttons. With the display off or showing the lock screen, and double click of the volume down button not only launches into the camera, but focuses and takes a photo. For the absolute quickest time and least steps from pocket to photo, the G4 wins. Unfortunately, that high-center positioning of the power and volume buttons means that it's easy to access when you're holding the phone in portrait mode, but rather awkward in landscape. Additionally, the volume button shortcut only works with the phone sleeping or on the lock screen; if you're using the phone, you have to open the camera app manually through the launcher.
The iPhone is the one option here that doesn't offer a quick hardware shortcut to the camera. Motorola's phones don't either, but a quick double twist of your wrist serves as a gesture to launch into the camera app from anywhere, even off. Apple, however, despite offering two volume buttons, a power button, and a home button, doesn't have a hardware shortcut. The home button has had the double click dedicated to going into multitasking view (logical, since a single click goes to the app launcher), or opening Wallet while the phone is asleep. Apple does offer a from-anywhere software option. Swipe up from the bottom of the display to access the Control Center with, well, controls for audio playback, quick settings toggles, and shortcuts for flashlight, timer, calculator, and the camera.
When it comes to the user interface, Apple offers the most straightforward option for the most users, but it doesn't offer nearly the customizability choice as Samsung or LG. And when it comes to quick access, it's hard to beat the shortcuts offered by Samsung and the Nexus phones — no matter what you're doing, the camera's just a double-click away on a button whose positioning you've learned by heart.

Conclusion
So how do these smartphone cameras truly stack up? They're all excellent, and any would be a fine "camera that you have on you" at any given moment. And while in the past whatever the most current iPhone was had a tendency to thoroughly pants the competition, this time it's a closer battle than we've seen in the past. In fact, I can't say that the iPhone is the best smartphone camera out there. It's a great camera attached to an excellent phone, but no longer the best, even with the improvements that Apple's made in the latest generation.
Kudos need to go Samsung and LG for really stepping up their game in the past few years, going from mediocre cameras to best-in-class units. But it's the Nexus 5X (and thus the Nexus 6P) that win this battle. The new Nexus phones may not have the most pixels to work with, but the big sensor with relatively huge pixels, collecting light through a nice bright aperture, but the photos they're producing are positively phenomenal.
It's a weird position to be, lauding a Nexus camera. After years of disappointment at the hand of multiple companies, the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P are coming at us with phenomenal cameras that will serve you well in practically every situation. The only real spot of concern was in the darkness of some of the daytime photos, but overall it handled itself quite nicely.
Apple, for all their expertise and effort in cameras, has met its match. And that's a good thing — so long as these companies keep pushing each other, we'll keep getting better and better devices on all fronts. Everybody wins.
Reader comments
Camera showdown: iPhone 6s vs. Nexus 5X vs. Galaxy S6 vs. LG G4
The 5x held its own! I still think the 6p should have been used... But still, I'm impressed.
Posted via my Nexus 6p
It's the same exact camera with the same software. If not for the photos of the actual devices I could have just said I used the 6P, the Note 5, and the V10. :P
Doesn't the 6P have electronic image stabilization and the 5x does not?
BTW - Great article and well done at making Cincinnati look beautiful.
yes, for video it does.
They didn't test video in this review, so it wouldn't have mattered.
Yes, CincyGuy approves :)
The software is not the same, doesnt the 6P have a slower slow mo camera??
Yup.
Posted via the Android Central App
Also isnt the software in the Note5/S6e+ a little bit different from the S6??
Yes, Note 5 has the full "pro mode".
how far the world has got since Kodak's first consumer camera
Note5/S6e+ also have advanced image stabilisation.
I know it's the same sensor but the 810 could make a difference in terms of speed, processing panos quicker. Same for s6 and note 5. Again I know the sensor etc is same but many reviews have said the note 5 even though same as s6 is slightly better and that could be due to enhancement in image processing. As we all know sensor is only part of the story, the software behind it play a massive part. Good comparison either way. Just shows you will be happy with most flagship phones which is good to know now.
Posted via the Android Central App
S6 and Note 5 have the same processor too. If there is a difference in output between them, it's purely software and Samsung is just being an ass for not updating the S6 with that better imaging software. Or maybe they have updated the S6 and improved the image quality since launch.
I see corndog already beat me to it. The 6P has EIS. The 5X does not.
6p has EIS. It also has burst mode cause of the faster processor. And can save photos faster. 6p should have been used. Ie...flagship to flagship...not flagship vs midrange
Eis is only for video. Burst mode isn't for hdr. The photos will save faster on the 6p but the photos will be the same. That is why this argument is not pointless.
While this may be the case, the 5X still won, so it really doesn't matter.
Mm, in my obsessesing which nexus to buy I saw several 5x vs 6p photo reviews that plainly showed an enormous gulf between the real world photos. The 5x pictures were consistently darker, and the night shots were some way off the 6p. All taken in auto. Enjoyed your review though.
Really? In the comparisons I've seen, the photos from the 5X and 6P looked identical.
I saw some of those reviews too. It was because the camera app on the 5X was causing flash timing errors, not because of the camera's hardware deficiencies.
Ah, but you're leaving out a critical hardware aspect: the Image Signal Processor. Apple has long customised its ISP to get better photos. The S808 in the 5X has dual ISPs like the S810, but they're not the same. Motorola actually edged right up to the limit of the S808's dual ISPs by offering a 21MP camera (Qualcomm claims a limit of 21MP rear / 8MP front, max), while the S810 gets up to 55MPs to play with, along with more bandwidth, faster processing, etc. etc.
The pictures will be mostly the same, but different enough to favor the 6P.
Why? Their the exact same hardware and software...?
Because electronic stabilization requires better internal hardware which the 6P has.
Posted via the Android Central App
and EIS is not used for normal photos (would add blur and all sorts of problems with distortion), EIS is for filming while moving. and tbh, they often add some problems in the processing stream that i rather not have there (much like RAW photography vs jpegs)
Yeah, this wasn't a camera shootout as much as, a article that should have been titled; Can the 5x/6p camera keep up. It looks to be a good camera, but certainly not at the same level as the 6s or the g4. As would be expected. I am starting to see a trend here on AC. It would have been more interesting to toss in a A9, ZF2, and a Moto X.
I have three of these camera on devices so tell me which to use!
I must say however that shooting video with my iPhone 6s+ is really sweet at 1080/60. Have not shot enough on my Nexus 6P yet.
Posted via my Nexus 6P!
Ok , now that I have looked at all the comparison shots on my desktop 4k monitor, the Galaxy S6 is the consistent winner for sharpness and quality in my eyes.
The statement of "... the other combatants in this arena are all equipped with OIS cameras." is not accurate. From what I've read, the Nexus 5X does NOT have it.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/09/28/sorry-part-3-both-the-nexus-5x-a...
You are correct, and this post has been corrected.
Derek, you haven't corrected this article as yet.
"Seeing as the other combatants in this arena are all equipped with OIS cameras,..."
OIS is extremely important for me and it's the most important of several reasons I prefer the HTC One A9 over the Nexus 5x. Nevertheless, based on my preferred non phablet size, decent price, despite limitations, your camera review of the 5x has rekindled my interest.
Since the 5x was in the mix, why not the A9?
BTW, very informative comparative review. Much appreciated.
Why is OIS extremely important to you?
OIS helps a lot with video, especially if you're moving as you shoot.
None of this matters much to me, personally. I don't use the phone camera much. But if I did, I'd want OIS (and EIS).
Because I have 'essential tremor'.
Plus first sentence ^ by Rogue Tomato.
OIS is extremely helpful. If you don't know what it is, OIS stands for Optical Image Stabilization and is a series of motors within the camera housing that automatically compensate for movement of the hand or movement in front of the camera to provide smoother pictures, videos, and better low-light performance. It's an extremely useful hardware feature that has only recently started showing up regularly in phones. In the past, phones like Nokia's Lumia devices and a few odds and ends phones were the only ones who really used OIS, but recently most flagships have it.
The acclaimed 2013 HTC One M7 has mechanical OIS.
Yes, it did, but that was a rarity in 2013.
Oh I know all about it (2 DSLR's and 6 lenses). I wanted to know why you needed it. I think this OIS thing is pretty overblown on wide angle lenses (like on cell phones). I think people are like, "Oh my gosh! They left a feature off the phone!" And I don't think it matters all that much. I'll take the 1/2.3" sensor without OIS over a 1/3" sensor with OIS any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Posted via the Android Central App
Why one or the other?
I'll take both.
I guess you either didn't read or understand my answer to your question as to why OIS or some excellent form of image stabilization is important to me.
Undoubtedly, smartphone camera capability is currently the most important feature among all users. Currently 1 trillion photos are uploaded to the Internet annually.
Smartphones are quickly overtaking dedicated cameras. They already have. Yes, DSLR's still take better pictures (obviously) but for the majority of people their smartphones are good enough now. Companies like Microsoft, Samsung, LG, and Apple all focus a lot on their cameras and do a good job on it. Motorola is trying and so is HTC but they're not quite there yet.
And most of those are photos are not taken by experienced photographers. Real world performance is what matters. And the 6P seems to be doing really well without OIS. OIS is not the end all be all.
If you bother to watch recordings from 5x you would realise that OIS or EIS is almost dentrimental to the usefullness of the camera (they are borderline useless right now)
I agree I also have a DLSR and tons of lenses... ima nik guy but I totally agree about the phone thing... it's really a non issue. More important is how well does it take photos and video compared to the others. Just check DXO website and you will see: http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Google-Nexus-6P-review-Serious-contender-...
So... whether it has OIS, EIS, just plain none what matters is what it can do... NOT the spec sheet lololol! These comments it needs to have OIS are just plain dumb... almost as much as the stupid bending videos o.O!
Exactly my point! I think we have a lot of non-photographer types that think OIS is the end all be all of photography. Real world performance is all that really matters to photographers. And so far, the real world performance of the 6P is very good. People are worrying for nothing.
Yes, OIS is important - but it has to be implemented well. Have you seen the OIS video samples for the HTC One A9 and LG G4? They're poorly handled and result in a strong jelly effect when moving the camera around. Honestly, lack of OIS is better than bad OIS - the shots may be shaky but at least it's not surreal-looking.
Yes implementation and sophistication of the mechanics like 3 way axis are important. Perhaps improved post processing methods or apps will help mitigate jelly or jiggle.
OIS as well as faster capture also helps eliminate blur with stills.
The following four points come from Google's Nexus team explains what the team have done to provide image stabilization for both devices.
1. The Nexus 6P/5X has a large 1.55um pixel camera, [so] the amount of motion blur due to hand-shake is lower, [because] you have large pixels.
2. We have a feature we call “lucky shot” internally. When you take a picture, behind the scenes, we select the best of 3 bursts of images.
3. When you use video, we have optic-flow-based image stabilization.
4. When you use SmartBurst, we select the best image from the burst (for example a shot with eyes open).
However they also said, both have the same sensor (IMX377) and F/2.0 optics, but 6P has more CPU/GPU horsepower so it has a few additional features like 240fps slo-mo (vs 120fps on 5X), Smartburst, and EIS.
[Figure that out]
BlackBerry PRIV has OIS, so if that's important, you may wish to consider it. I've been comparing its (prerelease software) photos with those of the Nexus 5X and they are quite similar in quality to my eye. Since Nexus 5X fared so well in this review, that may bode well for when the PRIV is reviewed.
You are wrong sir. Apple wins this and any other smartphone/tablet/watch competition you can come up with.
PS are you guys sure the Nexus night time photo as taken at night?
I've never been impressed with iPhone cameras. Yes, they're fast and easy to use, but they're not breathtaking in any other way. Not anymore.
Yes, finally Android OEM's caught up and in some implementations exceeded Apple during 2015, thank goodness.
Agreed. In fact to my eyes, it was hit or miss with all of them. To my eyes iPhone looked the best in maybe 3-4 pics but it was the same with Sammy and lg. the 5x didn't really impress, with exception of the fountain. Witch makes me kind of skeptical of the whole article... I mean "phenominal" as referring to the 5x camera? Maybe compared to other nexi, but I'm not sure I've heard that term used for any camera phone even the "award winning variety"
It's all a matter of preference, as well. Somethings are set and easy to define for everyone, but others can change depending on someone's personal preferences and opinions.
Actually, the Galaxy S3 already beat the iPhone 4S and the Galaxy S4 already beat the iPhone 5. But then the iPhone is half a year older than the Samsungs.
Trouble is that Apple didn;t improve the camera from iPhone 6 to 6S and the iPhone 6 camera was only a tiny fraction better than the Samsung S5 camera. So the galaxy S6 now blows the iPhone away completely.
DxOMark has the Xperia Z5 and Samsung Galaxy S6 camera's above that of the Nexus 6P though. To be honest I'd rather go with their objective and professional assesment of camera quality.
Definitely agree. My mom's S5 trounced the iPhone 6 back in 2014
Posted via the Android Central App
Except the S5 spits out poop when you try to take a low light picture.
I had seen the picture taken by my friend's iPhone 6 in low light condition. It is equally poop either.
ahaa..u said poop.
You have anything to back that up? Because the author of this story sure presented a lot of evidence showing otherwise.
Apple has been a huge disappointment to me with their camera on iPhone. My s6 blows my iPhone 6 away. Hands down. I honestly thought the iPhone may have become the device I truly loved, but I take a lot of pictures. And I found myself carrying around my s6 when I was using my iPhone 6 as my daily driver, just to take pics! Sorry, but there is proof in my experience that iPhone is not the ultimate winner in the camera competition. (and this article seems to say so also....)
Posted via the Android Central App
Same experience here as well
Yea who can take you seriously, when you blurt out "Apple wins any contest". Sounds pure 100% isheep. Well, only Apple fanboys will proclaim that Apple iphone camera can beat Panesonic CM1 (yes this is an android phone) with 1 inch sensor, but facts will never dissuade isheeps. Any real photograher will tell you CM1 stomps iphone 6S camera silly.
Just watch... just like before it'll be time to short Apple stock again in a few years... this time no bringing Steve Jobs back to save the company. (Which was insane in the first place since they kicked him to the curb before)
G4 IS A BEAST CAMERA WISE
It's probably the best, but only if used in manual mode and in hands of a professional :)
via AC App on
VZW Moto X DE/N7
Manual mode on the G4 is really easy to use, just go to YouTube and watch a 5 minute video on how to use it.
The Nexus beer goggles are strong with this one. While some of those Nexus photos are excellent, some of them are really piss poor, while the others are more consistently good, especially the S6 and G4.
The S6 is among the best phone cmaera i have used. Too bad the battery life is not ip to the others or i would carry mine more. 5.1.1 seemed to make battery life worse for me. Bummer.
That's a shame. I hear a lot that the S6 battery life is terrible. 5.1.1 really improved everything on my Note 4, including battery life, but that's a different beast entirely I guess.
They had made a lot of software optimization. And now my phone with latest update (that support "Apps Optimization" under Smart Manager) last me roughly 10-20% longer compare to previously. Of course, it still go back to how you use the phone.
I don't have the S6, but I don't have trouble with battery life, anyway. When I'm not using my phone and the battery is below 60%, I set it down on the wireless charger. Wireless charging > "Doze".
Honestly, I think I see at least a couple piss poor photos for each of the phones, but which ones specifically do you think are piss poor from the Nexus?
Off the top of my head, the first group of Daytime photos (the cabs and bus are blurry), the second group in the Nighttime photos (ghosting or other lens reflection defects).
For my eye...and I own none of these phones...I liked the Samsung S6 photos the best.
And that's the beauty of choice. You wouldn't go wrong with any of these phones.
I like the S6 photos the best, too, but the G4 looks like it sometimes has better color accuracy. I just happen to prefer the saturated reds of the S6.
Some of the 5X photos have terrible artifacts (ghost image that shouldn't be there), and lack of sharpness (like the cabs in the Radio City photo).
The depth of field is poor in all the grasshopper photos except the iPhone, but that could be the photographer's fault. The hind legs of the grasshopper shouldn't be out of focus. But they are, except in the iPhone pic.
Even with the depth of focus faults (and it could also be a result of the position of both the camera and the grasshopper and their relations to each other), I think the iPhone took the worst macro shot.
The hind legs being out of focus would most likely mean the depth of field is greater... The greater the depth of field, the smaller the plane of focus will be.
That's true. There's so many aspects that go into a camera.
I'm not getting your point. The depth of field is poor for the subject matter. If I were to take that picture with a real camera, I would adjust the aperture (among other things) such that the entire grasshopper was in focus. When i was into photography, I always made sure even my cheap camera had a depth of field preview so I could be sure I would get the results I wanted.
I am very impressed with the Nexus 5x. at $379 those are pretty nice. A little dark here and there, but still really good.
not impressed with LG/iPhone at all ( i am also using a calibrated 27" 5K 10 bit monitor )
Although, each had at least one photo that looked great.
Only a couple of the iPhone photos look good to me. Auto mode on the LG isn't going to produce the best results, but it has a great camera if you want to put in the effort. Yes, the 5X is impressive for the price (although I think you can get a G4 for nearly the same price now). But only for the price. It gets demolished by the more expensive competition.
Too bad there aren't any videos in this comparison.
It gets demolished by the more expensive competition? Do I really need to point out the several instances above where the 5X spanks the more expensive iPhone and Galaxy?
@rogue
these shoot-outs all use auto mode because that's what 9 out of 10 people are going to use.
The Galaxy can also do better in Pro mode. That's not the point of this article.
I dislike the LG pictures in general. I think their cameras are behind the comp. Their colors are off more often than not.
It is... this is all you need to read: http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Google-Nexus-6P-review-Serious-contender-...
What I don't like about my nexus 5x camera is viewfinder lagginess. When I turn my phone around to other locations it stutters big time. Even when moving camera a bit around you can see the stutter. Hate it, feels like some £20 phone.
And one more thing. With nexus 5 I used to take photos of architectural drawings and then zoom in for some measurement reading easily. Sharpness was outstanding when zoomed in to the Max. With nexus 5x when I zoom in to the Max there is no more sharpness.
My take away from this is that the G4 and N5x are incredible value for money (ok, i'm talking about the G4 price as it is now). I'm frankly astounded with what you get for mid-range prices, and have to question how Apple and Samsung can justify their prices from this perspective.
The justification for pricing is ... "will people pay it"? That's all.
This weekend i am selling my S6 and i have ordered a N5X on Monday. I am happy to see that N5X has a good camera.
People are too up in arms about cameras now. They all look damn good to me. I'm no expert, but I'm a regular user. The g4 camera (which I own) is great. So is my 6p. The iPhone and s6 take excellent pictures as well. But the thing is, you still get a picture out of all four of them. And they're definitely good. You can see what's in the pictures.
Posted via the Android Central App
Yeah, everyone is a expert now. Pics are like art , everyone sees something different. All of these cameras are great.
Posted via Nexus 6 running on any data plan I want
That's true but different people prioritize different things and for some people if a camera isn't adept at motion it doesn't matter if it's the best camera in the world for landscape shots because that person is going to use their phone to take pictures of their wild children. And also, it's good to know that despite all the differences between these phones and even their cameras they're all going to take decent pictures in every situation.
Agreed. A great camera is immensely important to me when I deciding on a smart phone, because I actually use and enjoy them, a lot. I make no apologies for that either. I'm a bit of a smart phone camera enthusiast actually.
Posted via the Android Central App
I am a smartphone camera enthusiast as well, but to be honest I'm perfectly happy with my little camera phone. My Lumia 830 can take some pretty stunning pictures with Lumia Denim. I've put it up against a Galaxy S5 in every scenario and it always comes out on top. I've not had a chance to play with the latest slough of flagships, however. I don't think it would matter though, because my phone is cheaper than any of the phones tested in this review and it's 10MP sensor with OIS is phenomenal for what I paid for it (brand new and unused).
Lumia cameras are awesome.
Posted via the Android Central App
Indubitably. I'm very excited to see the new Lumia 950 and 950 XL in action.
Which is the best camera for taking children / pets picture, do you have any recommendations? I'm torn between Iphone 6s with Samsung Galaxy s6 at the moment.
Both are very fast at focusing and taking the picture quickly. I would have to suggest the Galaxy S6 as I just prefer that phone but I dont think you can go wrong with either.
This is an excellent camera review article!
Posted via the Android Central App
The LG G4 camera continues to impress although I'm happy that my 6P can hold its own. Great camera samples and scenes btw.
I bet that If the Lumia 950 camera was there , it will beat them all
Posted via the Android Central App on my HTC Desire 610
I'm thinking that may be the case too.
Easily too I get the feeling. I think even the 930/Icon and 1520 could compete in some areas even being 2yrs old.
Posted via the Android Central App
Including the new Sony Xperia 5
Sadly the cameras are the only thing going towards the Lumia phones
Posted via the Android Central App
I have to disagree. I love the Lumia hardware and software. Yeah there's an app gap but it's never been an issue for me. The software is slick, efficient, secure, and personal. The hardware is beautiful, reliable, and well-built. I love Android but I'd just as happily use a Windows Phone.
Not really. Much like the G4, the strength of Nokia cameras (and Microsoft ones since they use licenced Nokia camera tech) is in the manual mode. And since this comparison is about "Dumb Mode"... ;P
Posted via the Android Central App
And it's the Samsung S6 for the win
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
I will say the 6p has a great camera and it is the best phone camera I have ever had . not saying alot since I rock nexus ;-) .. But it is very good
Posted via the 6P
Why wouldn't they use the s6e plus or the note 5. Not the older s6.... this comparison sucks... and whoever chose the phones to use in it should be ashamed.
Posted via the Android Central App
Agree 100%... Should have been the Note 5/edge+ vs the 6P, iph 6s plus. Maybe throw in the g4 (I had for a few weeks and didn't think it was as good as this yrs Samsung's.
Posted via the Android Central App
They were comparing similar form factor devices (the "commercial" flagships). It wouldn't have made much sense to compare the iPhone 6s to the Galaxy Note 5 when you have the iPhone 6s Plus or the Galaxy S6. Besides, it's not important. Just because the Galaxy S6 is older doesn't mean it has a bad camera. There haven't been many (if any) software improvements since the Galaxy S6 so the Note 5 camera should have nearly identical results.
If they were going to use the Note 5, it would've made more sense to compare it to the V10, iPhone 6s Plus, and Nexus 6P.
Then how do you justify this from the article?
Kudos need to go Samsung and LG for really stepping up their game in the past few years, going from mediocre cameras to best-in-class units. But it's the Nexus 5X (and thus the Nexus 6P) that win this battle.
It's very misleading....
Posted via the Android Central App
Well, the 5X and 6P do have nearly identical cameras, but so do the S6 and Note 5. And the G4 and V10. The 6s and 6s Plus are nearly identical except for OIS in the Plus. It just makes more sense (in my head at least) to compare phones of similar form factors. Just because the Note 5 has a better camera than the iPhone 6s doesn't mean people who like smaller form factors will buy the Note 5. It's a different case entirely with the S6 and 6s, see?
Either way, they're all good cameras. I'm waiting patiently for the first camera reviews for the Lumia 950 and 950 XL. Very excited about those cameras.
Why? The Note 5 and S6 edge+ are newer, yes, but they have the EXACT same camera as is in the standard S6. There's literally nothing newer or better about the cameras in the newer phones.
Hell, they have the same hardware behind them too. The S6 edge+ is a bigger S6 edge, the Note 5 is a bigger S6 with S Pen support. Your argument sucks.
Agreed. The Note 5 and S6 Edge+ have the exact same hardware as the S6, except a little more RAM, a larger display, and an S-Pen. They should have been released at the same time as the S6 since there was 0 advancement in technology or specs between them.
Too much iPhone talk on AC! I don't care what they do over there I'm a Android/Google user!
Posted via the Android Central App
So you wish to deny that iPhones exist and refuse to speak of them? No matter what way you look at it, iPhones have a big impact on the smartphone market. I don't like them either, but I still acknowledge their existence and their right to be displayed next to the best Android has.
They just popularize what Android starts.. That's their contribution to the smartphone world..
Your exactly right! iPhone fans are blind
Posted via the Android Central App
If that were true wouldn't blackberry keyboards and tracking balls be all the rage?
This is a Android site/app! If I wanted to know about anything iPhone I would look for it on a iPhone site.
Posted via the Android Central App
I'm just saying, it doesn't make sense to completely separate Android from iOS from Windows Phone, since they're all important influences on the other. No matter how you look at it, Android is always competing with iOS.
Your browser doesn't have a back button? Suggest you move on when you see something you don't care to see, and let those of us who do. OK with you?
This from a cubs fan lol! It's my comment I can say what I want! Go troll somewhere else
Posted via the Android Central App
Aw you would be the troll...
Posted via the Android Central App
Exactly. Not smart enough to see his own problem, apparently.
I actually like that AC isn't afraid to make comparisons between android phones and iPhones, and gives credit where it's due. It's sure better than Rene Ritchie's chest-thumping over at iMore.
I get your point but all iPhone fans and websites does nothing but bash or downplay anything Android does so when I go to a Android site I want to here about Android that's it
Posted via the Android Central App
then don't click articles that have iPhone in the title... simple really.
don't read other people's comments
Posted via the Android Central App
Maybe you should build your own website then?
Your right about that
Posted via the Android Central App
Only thing I don't like about the Nexus camera is the lack of 16:9 at max resolution. But otherwise, thank you, Google, for finally putting a camera sensor in your devices that is worth something. To be fair, my Nexus 6 takes some decent photos.
I just want to laugh. It's almost impossible to realistically compare the S6 to the Nexus phones.
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
acelucerio75
Clearly you consistently lack the ability to engage in logical, rational, well-thought-out, sensible discourse.
Of course because I fail to acknowledge that Samsung is the undisputed champ when it comes to smartphone photography? What am I missing here?
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
a few marbles
Please remove the Nexus beer glasses
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
Funny you use the term disclosure....... You must think this is an episode of the X-Files.. http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/06/18/nasa-openly-admits-alien-life-exis...
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
The term used was "discourse" ...
Enjoy this wise guy....... The Samsung Galaxy S6 (and the Note 5) has ZERO weaknesses in the camera department and in all light situations captures image quality that is among the very best seen from any conventional smartphone cameras. Wrap it all up in an attractive metal and glass body and add a gorgeous Quad-HD screen for image viewing and composition to the mix and it's very difficult to not recommend the Samsung to anyone who likes taking pictures with their smartphone. The Galaxy S6 Edge is the camera phone to beat in 2015.......... Is that full disclosure enough for Mr Wise-Guy?
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
If you think any camera, even the most expensive DSLR on the planet, has zero weaknesses then you know nothing about cameras. Nothing.
Nothing!!!!!!! Nothing!!!!!!!! Absolutely Nothing!!!!!!!! Jesus Christ.......... I love Stock Android just as much as anybody but could we please put the fanboyism to bed already.
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
I have owned phones from Samsung, LG, Motorola, and Google in the past year. I am the very opposite of a fanboy. I do think that Samsung has the best cameras overall this year, but to say they have zero weaknesses or are the best in every situation is simply false. -Galaxy S6 owner
Damn it feels good to be right
Well the 6P is right there with it... no touchwiz, runs pure android, is fast as heck, has a battery that lasts ridiculously longer and has and unlocked bootloader that's an easy choice there: http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Google-Nexus-6P-review-Serious-contender-...
LG G4 wins it for me. Galaxy S6 2nd. Nexus 5X 3rd. Iphone 6s 4th.
Why use the 5X and not the 6P? Yes they are technically the same camera, but the camera on the 6P does more, because of the extra processing power.
Posted via the Android Central App
In what way does the processing power of the 6P make its camera 'do more' over the 5x?
Got some answers
They have the same CAMERA hardware, but different capabilities. "Yea, same sensor (IMX377) and F/2.0 optics, but 6P has more CPU/GPU horsepower so it has a few additional features like 240fps slo-mo (vs 120fps on 5X), Smartburst, and EIS."
http://www.slashgear.com/5-nexus-6p5x-features-google-didnt-tell-you-abo...
Here you go....... http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/samsung_galaxy_s6_review
Dam It Feels Good To Be A Google Gangster
Not relevant to the above question ask and comment about the advantage of the 6P over the 5x by mlemos76 which prompted me to research and gain a better understanding.
Thanks Jimbo for finding the article.
Posted via the Android Central App
I'd be interested to know if different camera apps make much difference to the outcomes.
I use manual camera on my N5 a lot for the sheer flexibility and speed.
Posted via the Android Central App
Just a note, most Samsung devices have a Sony camera sensor. Only a few have the in-house made Samsung one.
Nexus is #1 camera.. I'm shocked.. Good to see Google finally taking this whole smartphone thing seriously.
It really isn't.
Posted via the Android Central App
I don't know about that, but the 5X and 6P are #2, if you catch my meaning.
iPhone hasn't been the best for years.
Posted via the Android Central App
So Sony Manufactures the LG Nexus 5X??
I received my N6P a couple days ago and I have noticed this too. Even though pictures are very sharp and well focused but they are dark. Especially outdoors where there is much contrast in the scene N6P cant handle the dynamic range and makes the dark portions even darker. If I try to compensate exposure by focusing on darker parts then highlights are blown out.
I'm really looking forward to seeing how the Lumia 950/XL fares in the camera department. Apps problem aside, those Lumias usually have pretty nice cameras.
If I'm honestly looking at the photos, I can't come to the same conclusion. Sorry. Looks like the iPhone has the most balanced results of the bunch, but the gap is certainly narrower than in the past.
IPhones pictures always look great on small screens but truly lack the detail of the other high end androids. Color reproduction is great imo tho. And may be the best camera for people who don't care much about anything bjng but taking okay pictures. Changing iPhone camera settings is also way too difficult because if ios. But you Def can tell the iPhone lacks detail and sharpness here.
The detail is there for the most part. The ones with the exception of the tree seem to be mis-shot somehow. Out of focus or focused on the part of the image that isn't blown up. Looks like the Nexus has the tendency to over-expose, which is a problem for me.
The test here isn't scientific. Only non-Android camera is moved and thus appears blurred.
The detail is there if you don't move while taking the picture.
The 6p should've been used since it has EIS.
This is probably the best article I've read on AC in the past 6 months, great job.
They honestly all look great, and it's amazing how large a leap we've seen in camera tech this year. I'm a 6p owner, so maybe I'm a little bias, but I thought it performed best, specifically in action photos which for me is most important. The S6 and G4 took some of the best shots though, except for the dusk/night pics where I thought the 6p performed best.
The iPhone took some amazing shots too, but didn't shine in any specific category. I'd be more than happy with any of the 4, but I'm still shocked that Nexus is finally on the same level as the other 3. Before the 6p dropped, I'd have never believed it would rival the S6.
This year's Nexus devices have really stepped up in terms of camera quality.
No longer do we have to call the cameras on these devices "Potatoes".
Yeah, I wonder if Stanley Winthrop will retire his alias NoNexus...
Nexus 6p $400
Note 5 $700
...or struggle to remain shameless.
Probably not since he's not big on stock Android.
Though he's more like NoOne+ now, which I like.
The new Hamilton Beach SD toaster. Powered by the Snapdragon 810.
Kind of bummed not to see a Lumia in the mix. I realize they are old now, but they are still some of the better smartphone cameras.
I'm actually really curious to see how the Lumia 1020 holds up today against the newest devices...
Posted via the Android Central App
It's impossible to do exact precise replication of each shot with different cameras, a minute later of light etc., more so to guess how each processor/app thingy is calculating the shot.
That being said you all know this, but it's easy to forget.
It's all subjective in the end, as long as they impress you to a certain level for different situations. This should be more about if they all reach a certain level, rather than picking an outright winner or a hierarchy based on comparing shots of the same subject.
And I guess this has been what this blog was about.
For a further demonstration of me explaining the bleeding obvious, tune in next week.
No one's even talking about the N5X doing all of this for less than half the price of some of these other phones. A week in, my only complaint about the photography experience on the N5X has to do with the 2 gig RAM situation. This phone generally flies, but photography editing apps like Snapseed are dogs. The great new Adobe suite of apps aren't even supported yet. Hopefully soon?
Posted via the Android Central App
What about video? Some of us actually use that feature.. I would also like to see (hear actually) how well they handle loud audio/bass, like when recording a concert.. nobody seems to care about that?!?!
I'm not really too picky so all the photos look great to me.
Thanks for the good test.
It's subjective, but it looks to me S6 and iPhone consistently produced good pictures. I didn't like the darker pictures of 5X. G4 seems to have some quirky pictures.
Why is it that I cannot click and look at the full screen photo on the AC app?
Posted via the Android Central App
By the way, props to Kessler on this article. No one's gonna agree 100% of the time, but this was a thorough, detailed review of 4 phenomenal phones. Detected zero bias throughout, no typos. His chart got cut a bit near the top, but we're all spec'd to death anyway. Thumbs up on the history of Android articles too.
Posted via the Android Central App
Would it be fair to say that it comes down to processing software now, rather than hardware?
You can see the choices made by each manufacturer. The 5X seems to choose to be darker, but richer colors. The G4 seems to need work in some cases where it blows out colors as if by a bug in software. HDR going a bit wrong.
The iPhone just looks like it plays safe, and that's fine. Always a decent pic, if not always the best.
Nice job Derek. Would like to hear more from you around here.
Objectively looking at these results, I'd rank them:
S6
5x (very close second, if not a tie for 1st...some shots a little dark, but detail is among best...and dark shots can easily be corrected in PS, but adding more detail cannot)
iP6 (produces consistent results, but not always top notch)
G4 (camera is good, but blows too many shots, so not reliable IMO)
And the lesson here is Nexus finally gets the camera it always deserved as the showcase device for Android. It's about frikken time. I can see why Dxo ranked the Nexus and S6 very highly.
Nice shots of the hometown. Even got in a Bearcats game!
I like all 4 phone cameras. My personal ranking would be the following.
#1 - Galaxy S6 - Best all-rounder.Takes great shots in any condition without much effort.
#2 - iPhone 6S - The lower MP count may hurt a bit of detail, but that is a non-issue, as the phone excels everywhere else. The main reason it's below the S6 is that it doesn't come with as many features and lack of OIS on the non-Plus variant, but it's still excellent.
#3 - LG G4 - LG's best camera effort to date. Great outdoor pictures with quick laser-AF and lots of camera trickery for one of 2015's best camera experiences, mainly let down by it's subpar processing at low-light, which tends to blow out lit subjects. (I own one and I can tell you, it's definitely there)
#4 - Nexus 5X - It may be at the bottom of the list, but that doesn't mean it's the worst. It's a brilliant camera that can hold it's own against the other flagships. Picture quality is great, only let down by a somewhat bare camera app, lack of OIS and somewhat iffy processing.
Note that all 4 are brilliant. In fact, the difference is only about 2-3 decimal places apart. That's how close they are and really, the real winner for me if price is taken into account would be the Nexus 5X, since at $379, it offers a surprisingly capable camera.
However, once the LG G4 fires up it's manual mode in the hands of a great photographer, it's #1 in my books.
Very well done and educational for those of us in learning more. Thanks.
Posted via the Android Central App
I like Galaxy S6 cameras because it takes great shots in any condition without much effort
Well put together comparison. I love how the Android phones are stepping up their game in this arena. I usually don't go nuts about camera on a phone as they'll never stack up to what pro photographers use. I am a semi pro and for those moments I use my Sony a6000 rather than my N6 ( N6P is still in route).
Great article nevertheless.
Based purely on aesthetics, I ranked each grouping 1-4 and added up points based on it. 4 for the best and so on down to 1. Here's what I ended up with
iphone: 41
S6: 48
G4: 39
5X: 52
The G4 did much better in the macro and panorama sets, but many of the early photos were just too blown out and it was often the worst shot, I felt. The iphone was the exact opposite. In the macro, the panoramas, and some of the darker images, the photos just looked dead. The color representation may have been more accurate, but I wouldn't want to show them off (whereas I really liked the glow effect produced by the 5X on the bridge). The 5X and S6 were rarely the worst and often the best shot.
The numbers could go up or down, and some of them were very close (I didn't do any ties). The only outcome for me is that I'd probably be happier overall with the 5X or the S6 than the iphone or G4 when taking photos on default settings.
Personally, I think the GS6 wins this with the N5X being a close second
Posted via the Android Central App
Very nice camera comparison. The LG G4 just begs for a little shutter speed adjustments to tame it's tendency to overexpose in a range if different shooting scenarios. I can't wait to get my V10 this weekend. The manual controls are perfect for me. I absolutely love what LG has made capable on a mobile phone this year and the fact that they kept all the hardware advantages like removable battery and MicroSD expansion. Sony, it's been nice but the Z3 was never able to give me the control I wanted over my camera and I'm looking forward to a camera experience that doesn't come with a heat warning as soon as the temperature rises. LG FTW!
Posted via the Android Central App
The manual camera settings along with the SD card slot were big selling points to me when I got the G4.
Exactly. The fact that the manual mode was more robust than the Lumia phones had me sold and everything I wished my Z3 would become after the Lollipop update. Only Sony chose not to include the Camera2 APIs STILL after the long wait. Can't wait to have those controls and even extended to video at my fingertips. I won't even bother with one single third party camera app probably.
Posted via the Android Central App
Like I've said elsewhere, I rarely take photos with my phone. But having manual options would make me more likely to use the phone to take photos. I've had some great SLRs, but one of my favorites was the simple Nikon FE2. Manual everything, depth of field preview - I loved it.
Got my V10 last weekend. I had been watching all of the announced phones this year and was able to upgrade back in May, but waited around for the V10 and have not been let down at all. Great phone and the battery life, not to mention the deal with the spare battery makes it even that much more a great bargain. I am not one who normally jumps on the Samsung messed up by not having a SD slot or removable battery, but it did actually make this purchase that much better. I have had consistent battery issues from Samsung after a year or more of using their products (S3 and S5) and so I just frankly do not trust their batteries enough to not be able to remove them when they start to go out. Getting the 200gb memory card for nothing is awesome too! No complaints!
Yes we have until the 15th of this month for that deal and I'm getting mine tomorrow. I can't wait! My only fear is not realizing just how much content I've captured with all that memory when it comes time to upload to the computer. I will be a walking camera man at home capturing all the memories! :)
Posted via the Android Central App
I hope get the Nexus 5X in two months :), love the camera, maybe is not the best of the best but I like the results, specially low light and macro, I would like to test it with a trypod and DNG files of course, the app "Manual Camera" will be really interesting in this device
I think that with OIS this phone will be even more solid in low light conditions; videos too, in 4K the quality is amazing!.
I'm really happy with the huge step that Google made with their phones.
PD: Where I can get the macro shot from the 5X in full resolution? I want it!
Great article. Glad to see the Nexus 5X I bought last week can hold its own with the big boys. Even though the camera has never mattered to me it's nice to finally see a Nexus with a good camera. I can not deal with anything but stock Android, so I've generally been accustomed to mediocre cameras on my phones.
About the short cut on lock screen on the G4 the article states "Oddly, LG opted to leave that shortcut out of the latest devices." which is wrong. It's just located in the lower right corner.
It actually has two different ways of working.
1 if the screen is turned on and the phone is in a locked state there will be a swipe to the left to enter the camera app.
2 if the screen is turned on and the phone is unlocked there will be 5 icons for phonecall, sms, memo, gallery and camera.
Not that it will change the results in the conclusion, just wanted to point this error out.
Beat me to it...
Posted via the Android Central App
Great test and fun to see the results. I will add a bit of constructive criticism. Please look at metering as well. By far the best camera I have had has been the Moto G, thanks to their little focus/exposure circle. I can run in full auto and still easily maintain a bit of control of the end result. It is in the area of "pro features", but not as advanced as full manual.
Samsung indeed has a very impressive camera this time. The only problem that I had with it is sometimes when I try to snap my kids naughty-in-action moment in full Auto mode, and I got some subject blurry shot (not sure it's because of the Auto HDR or due to the kids is moving)... Otherwise, normal picture are very nice even in restaurant setting.
HDR is not for moving objects (or people), so, if you take pics of your kids, put the HDR off, inclusive I will recommend you the "sport mode" (the sport mode is especially for daylight pictures, cuz the fast shutter needs a lot of light, otherwise you will get a picture with a really high ISO)
I really like the LG G4 camera but I was wondering how the Z5 series camera's would have fared in this competition? Never see too many on that phone..
I saw a Z5 dedicated review like this, a picture of each scenario and the dynamic range and white balance are really good, but quality is really bad (at least in auto mode) I was expecting the best camera but in XDA all Z5 users complains about the bad quality of the pictures; otherwise, seems that Manual Mode helps a lot to the final quality, I'm sure that is a software problem, Sony never did a good job with their camera software, I remember how the Xperia Z/ZL used to lost a lot of sharpness with the normal mode, and gain a lot of quality and sharpness in BURST mode...something really weird :/
I use manual mode most often because I can adjust the color temperature. I've never noticed the excessive orange talked about here and I do display this phone photos on a large screen monitor at work.
So by brand, LG is sort of represented twice.
Posted using SwiftKey on my LG G4 via the Android Central App
Great article.
Software optimization can only go so far.
Hardware denotes the obtainable limit.
Your correct.
Competition is great for everybody
Good comparison. I do prefer the Galaxy S6 over the Nexus 5X camera. Awesome photos, super-quick to launch, volume buttons as hardware shutter, and a much more complete camera app.
Please add the new Lumia 950 (or XL).
I like the picture quality of Galaxy S6, But Lumia 950XL will beat them all without any doubt
The Camera showdown between the iPhone 6s vs. Nexus 5X vs. Galaxy S6 vs. LG G4, demonstrates how great all of these phones are, however, the Nesus 5x and iPhone 6s are most peoples favourites: http://iphone6s-1.weebly.com
-"Yes, the Galaxy S6 offers a limited manual mode and the G4 has the option to go full manual and spit out highly-tweakable RAW files, but that's not the point of this comparison. The truth is..."-
The truth is, that even though most people won't take the time to make a better photo with their phone, an exhaustive review does a disservice to the readers by not at least investigating the possible improvements that can be made, with a minimum of effort, by moving beyond strictly P&S. Snapseed will now open native raw files and process them right on the phone. There should be a paragraph or two showing the differences that are possible.
Was very complimentary on this article, but you're absolutely right. Even my N6 could get great photographs if you followed some photography fundamentals. Snapseed has been amazing for some time now, but with RAW support, it's all you need. Very slow on my 2 gig N5X, but it works, and the pics are stunning. Any serious photographers out there tinkering with Snapseed on the N6P yet? Still waiting on mine. Lmk. No one wants to admit this, especially professional photographers, but in the right hands, these new crop of phone cameras, when compared to a lot of DSLRs, can fool experts.
Posted via the Android Central App
Come on!
Just looking at the first 4 pictures and only comparing the iPhone 6 to the N5X:
iPhone 6 vs Nexus 5x
Wall-E: iPhone 6 wins. N5X is too dark.
Wall of Books: iPhone 6 wins. N5X is again, too dark. Also too warm.
Wall of Windows: iPhone 6 wins. N5X is freaking purple!
Sandwich shop: N5X wins finally! iPhone 6 colors are not as rich.
My take, for what it's worth, is this: The S6 clearly pumps the saturation, but that is sometimes a benefit. The G4 clearly soaks up more light than the others, but that is sometimes a detriment. The iPhone is balanced, but washes out too often. The 5X is balanced and shockingly good for what it is. For someone who really knows what they're doing, I think the G4 takes the win, and not just because of the manual mode - someone who really knows how to frame their shots can make great use of how much light the thing pulls in. That said, any one of them would be a great option. Except for the iPhone, because it's an iPhone.
Posted via the Android Central App
I'd have to say that in all my camera usage the S6 still has the best overall pictures. That is strictly in my usage and preference of the final product. I feel as if the Nexus should be awarded most improved though. Also for the people looking at software difference and which has the best and tweaking need to understand most people will pull their phone and snap a pick. That's it. That's what this review is based on.
Posted via the Android Central App
None of this matters tbh. Android is bottlenecked when sharing those pictures out to social media. I have done extensive testing with both my Note 5 and iPhone 6s Plus - android version of images shared (like facebook) is lower res then instagram.
The iphone uploads to facebook and other social media and a MUCH higher resolution then Android. I have brought this up in several forums (including the forums on this site) - I have asked editors to look for themselves, it is easily replicated.
There has to be either A. Some sort of deal Apple has cut with social media and picture sharing, since theirs is all high res B. Facebook has forgotten about Android?
Let me be clear, this is not a troll post - I love all technology, and I 100 percent agree that the new Galaxy/Note series take better pictures then the iphone 6s - as I see it first hand. The only thing that prevents me from using my note 5 as my daily phone is that I cant share those awesome pictures out to social media, since it is soooooo degraded....
So true, and frustrating! Everything you said is true, except on thing-
that "none of this matters"
People don't stop going to very good restaurants because they don't serve Big Macs, just like photographers won't abandon good hardware because they can't post a selfie as good as a 13 year old with an iPhone 5.
For some, maybe most, SM might be very important. However, if you are even halfway serious about your photos, there are plenty of ways around this.
It's all personal, but these Android cameras are the state of the art. RAW support, a more diverse, responsive, if not better, app environment, compatibility with PC, price, carrier options. This all outweighs the benefit of a slightly sharper 2" X 3" photo on Instagram.
Posted via the Android Central App
95 percent of all these pictures taken are shared on social media. They are not transferred over to a computer for editing, then posting on flickr (while I am sure some small percentage out there do this). Facebook/Instagram are where these pictures are being shared.
I am not looking for professional quality by any means at all - but using Facebook as an example, photos posted from an Android phone are downgraded to a lower resolution then even Instagram - it truly is pathetic looking. I think in the last test I did - it is something like .2 megapixels. Whereas the iPhone posts in near full resolution (example - if you post a picture on Android, then post the same picture with an iphone, look at them both on a computer - the iphones will be almost full res taking up your entire computer screen - the Android version will be about as big as a thumbnail.).
I am just curious why no sites out there at least mention this in their camera test articles, as it truly does not matter that you have a 16MP camera that takes astounding shots - if there is nothing you can do with that picture. I am purposefully ignoring the small percentage that enjoy to use RAW and do some more editing on a computer for later upload - but like I said, last report I saw was 95 percent of all of these photos taken on a phone are for Facebook/Instagram. I sound a little defensive because you seem to minimize this by giving the example of some teenager selfie - that couldnt be further from the truth :/
EVERY single photograph uploaded to SM from an iPhone designed since autumn 2012, and until very recently, has, obviously, been taken with a 8mp device with a smallish but efficient 1g RAM. Near total uniformity in file size, type, delivery.
In other words, it's very easy for the SM sites to receive and compress iPhone images.
There are now more than 24,000 Android devices in the wild. So let's be wildly conservative and say half of those currently have FB support. Compare that to the number of supported Apple devices - 11 phones and a few tablets, all with very similar output.
While the current crop of Android phones have exceptional, indeed superior, processing power, sadly this is not even close to the truth with the Android device population as a whole. The VAST majority of SM pics, FB/IG in particular, are uploaded internationally, many of those from emerging markets with inferior information infrastructure and devices.
Without getting into the technical...
http://www.xda-developers.com/a-look-into-instagrams-compression-quality/
It's a simple matter of SM sites needing to provide a modicum of uniformity across their one Android application.
Maybe premium, or "pro versions" could be an answer. Something with a system requirement of 2g RAM or file minimum perhaps?
I'll stop razzing you shortly, but you've kinda betrayed yourself out of that 95% by exposing the lengths you have gone through to figure this out, and I FEEL YOU, I really do, but you're talking to me here on AC just like I'm talking to you. We're the minority, geeks if you will.
Most PEOPLE just want their silly picture up there. Most GEEKS like to talk about the tech. Never the 'tween shall meet!
:)
Posted via the Android Central App
I'd also like to see that report
Posted via the Android Central App
All of them very very good cameras amazing all of them can't decide on any very well but LG look like the best of all those even thought some of the pics Samsung and iPhones look better but in the majority's LG pics look a little better...
if it weren't for the vast number of issues with the G4 overall (not least of which was the terrrrrible battery life), I'd still have my G4 based off the camera performance alone. Its quality just didn't outweigh the myriad of problems my device had overall. Great camera.
Why no people/portrait samples?
I reckon a large number of pics taken are of people.
WoW the G4 won, by far.
Posted via my LG Flex 2
All great cameras and they all have their own quirks... but I hope the readers take all this with a grain of salt. Comparing shots of the tree when the S6 & G4 had HDR enabled is not exactly a valid submission to test against. but thank you for the discretion!
i understand the reasons for using auto mode to make a comparison. but stating that most people are just going to shoot in auto because they don't care about manual settings, why would you then consider an LG G4? the point of having high quality hard and software IS because you're NOT just shooting auto mode. Plus if i really verify the pictures taken in low-light, the iphone is just basically useless. my moto G 2nd gen takes similar pictures. very noisy and no details. the 5X is not bad at all but quite a lot of noise. the S6 is very good and the G4 just has a very high exposure setting. but now comes the point: just go manual and then you can create a stunning picture with the G4! and that makes it the most advanced and amazing camera-smartphone out there. no comparison with others. full stop.
I have seen excellent LG V10 (same camera as G4) images taken in different light conditions on theverge review.
Posted via the Android Central App
transfer data between any two smartphones from iPhone or android
http://www.facebook.com/KSOFT.CC/videos/725839117521403/
maybe i misunderstand how math and MP works. But 4000*2992= 11.968 MP while 4032*3024=12.193 MP ... me thinks that LG/Google have over sold that sensor, or are not utilizing its full capacity.
This is PRECISELY the kind of contest I like best! The kind where it's trade offs and give and take. Each and every phone here took its turn being the best of the bunch (or more or less tied for best of bunch), as well as having its turn being the worst of the bunch (or again, more or less tied.) And lastly, they also all took their turns coming in roughly the middle of the pack.
THIS makes for the kind of multifaceted complex face offs between similarly worthy competitors that I find sooooooo fascinating! It's precisely why I like the 4th generation of home video gaming (aka "the 16-bit console wars") so very much, because they too all take their turns at being the best, worst, and middle at stuff. Anyone who imagines that contest being any kind of landslide has absolutely no idea what they're talking about, and is quite patently talking out of some other orifice than their mouth.
I find lopsided contests boring. It's demeaning to the loser, patronizing to the winner, and leaves no excitement for the reader.
That said, I'm glad they chose the Nexus because a) a great phone in a Nexus is a first, and b) I'm planning on getting one at tax time (the 6p). Since I already have a 6+, I plan on skipping the 6s line, and I'm just not in any hurry to go back to a third party Android phone anytime soon. So when I unwrap that Nexus, and pop in the SIM card, and start taking shots, I will be wielding what Android Central deemed to be the best overall shooter in the class. Yay me! :-)
While quite pleased with their verdict, I'm also surprised by it. As the article progressed, it seemed to me like it was trending more towards the G4, and indeed, even to my own mostly untrained eyes, looking at the thumbnails on an iPhone screen, a lot of the pictures did seem to look best on that phone. The Nexus seemed of the bunch to actually get the least amount of talk time in the piece. So it was something of a small jolt as I encountered the big surprise of the sleeper Nexus taking it home!
In any case.....I'll take it! :-)
I'm just glad that the camera contests are so much more interesting now, with more serious players in the arena. No longer is this just an Apple and Samsung game! And while it may sound trite as hell for me to say this, while there may have been a winner, there were certainly no losers! Outstanding cameras all!
Cheers!
Have no idea what reviewer is seeing but I see the G4 on top followed by the S6 then the 5X and lastly the 6S.
I do wish they could've waited to do this til the Lumia 950/950XL could've been included, tho.
I was tracking with this entire post (loving Cincy shots, btw) until the plot twist of the 5X winning... I've owned a G4, iP6, and have a note 5 now, and I'd take any of those over the 5X even just based on this review. I admit I may be a bit biased bc I despise Google's Camera app compared to the other 3 interfaces, but still, just looking at image quality I'd still choose any of those other cameras over the 5X.
Android Central you have no idea about taking photos. I have an LG G4 and it produces way way sharper and better night shots than the S6 especially in manual mode. The S6 night shots are noisy and grainy compared to G4. The slight over exposure on G4 or S6 might be to do with brighter aperture
Always love reading your articles Derek!
I'm glad that I bought my Nexus 5X two weeks ago. One of the first photos that I took, a bowl of mushroom soup in a moderately illuminated sushi restaurant, was so detailed and clear that I sent it to my professional photographer friend to share my good fortune. He was impressed. HDR was automatically selected for the shot. All good!
The Bridge photo taken witḥ the V10 at Dusk is way over exposed. Can that shot be better if taken in manual mode?
If so, with what settings ?
Posted via the Android Central App
If I don't have my DSLR in my hand, I usually don't take the shot. Forgive me, I have issues.
I have the same issues. I rarely take photos with my phone.
Crazy bad review. "Let's not use manual mode" is like saying let's review a smartphone and only consider a few of its functionality. Sure, quick shot should be part of the review, to not entirely based on this. Also looking at the photos on my 70" TV the 5x look the worst in most photos.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3Ykw4Da_BU
Great article. Stoked to get my Nexus 6P. Editing recommendation: I recommend putting a header on the big pictures (overlay), or make them appear with a note above or below the picture, to explain which phone & what setting is used. Just like you have for the small thumbnail shots on the main page. Its easy to compare the small pics because of your overlays, but they are small and thus its hard to make a good judgement on which phone takes the best pics. its impossible to compare the big pics you have (when you click on the thumbnails) because we dont see an overlay (or any information) of what phone took what picture. I was even trying to hover for a link to give a hint based off the url (but using Chrome I didnt get that).
Today my wife just got the iPhone 6s Pro and I the Nexus 5X. We both loaded the Keep App. The Nexus 5X did something the iPhone 6 could not. Within the app I have an option to "Grab image text". We took each took a picture of her new SIM card to save PUK code on it. Her photo was much clearer but the Nexus was able to convert the text on the photo to text (which is placed in the note itself). Something her iPhone was unable to do. My phone did something that your could not, ha, ha.
valuable information..........but if nexus 6p would also included then it will give some more clarity between these phones