Garmin Venu 4 vs. Forerunner 570: An all-rounder or a running specialist?
Is the generalist Venu 4 or specialized Forerunner 570 the right option for around $500?
The everyman's watch
The Garmin Venu 4 crams some of Garmin's excellent fitness and health-tracking sensors into a stylish smartwatch. It has a long battery life, bright display, and a wide variety of fitness features. The software is also more user-friendly with a touch of smartphone connection.
Pros
- Two size option, refined design with flat sides
- OLED screen with high brightness
- New flashlight
- Fast performance and improved Garmin software
Cons
- On the heavier side
- Uncomfortable for sleep tracking
- Shorter battery life than Venu 3
- More expensive
A running-first watch
The Garmin Forerunner 570 is flashy, with a colorful and lightweight design that features multiple tactile buttons. It's excellent for hands-free navigation during intense interval workouts and lap running. Although it misses out on offline maps, ECG, and longer battery life, it's a great mid-tier watch for runners.
Pros
- Extra buttons, which are great for interval training and laps
- Daily suggested workouts in the Morning Report
- Stylish, colorful design
- Latest Garmin sensor for accurate workout tracking
Cons
- No LED flashlight
- Same, relatively short battery life as Forerunner 165
- Not as fully-featured as Forerunner 970
Garmin fans that want the brand's renowned health and fitness data without spending a fortune for it will probably turn to the Venu 4 or Forerunner 570. The two fitness smartwatches are each priced at $550, placing them in the mid-tier segment. The next step up in price puts buyers firmly in premium territory, with the Garmin Venu X1 costing $800 and the Forerunner 970 going for $750.
Still, the question of whether to put your $550 toward the Garmin Venu 4 or the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a perplexing one. While the Forerunner is better for running, as the name suggests, it's lacking in other areas compared to the Venu. When you consider the Venu 4 can also handle basic run tracking, it's easy to start looking at that Garmin smartwatch as the more versatile option. Let's compare all the differences between the Venu 4 and the Forerunner 570 to help you decide which one to buy.
Garmin Venu 4 vs. Forerunner 570: Design and display
Why you can trust Android Central
Looking at the Garmin Venu 4 and the Forerunner 570, you'll immediately notice that these two smartwatches feature completely opposite design styles. The Forerunner 570 is colorful and lightweight, foregoing premium materials like stainless steel in favor of lightness. The flashy, bright colors make it excellent for visibility and good looks while running, but limits how well the Forerunner 570 can dress up.
On the other hand, you have the Garmin Venu 4 with a stainless steel and fiber-polymer case, plus a fully stainless steel bezel. It looks more premium, with flat sides, fewer buttons, and muted colors. The Venu 4 is also smaller, both in overall footprint and thinness. It's available in both 41mm or 45mm sizes, offering 1.2-inch or 1.4-inch displays.
Despite the Forerunner 570 also offering 1.2-inch and 1.4-inch displays, it's larger, with 42mm and 47mm case options. Each watch sports an AMOLED display with a high peak brightness rating of 2,000 nits.
The watch is slightly thicker, at 12.9mm compared to 12.5mm. However, it's also lighter, which is crucial for a running watch. The 42mm model weighs 42 grams and the 45mm weighs 47 grams, including the strap. By comparison, the Venu 4 weighs 46g and 56g for its small and large size offerings, respectively.
Both ship with silicone sporty straps, but use standard 20 or 22mm watch bands, so they're fairly easy to swap out.
On the back, both Garmin watches feature a health sensor and the company's proprietary charging connector. Notably, the Venu 4 has an LED flashlight, which is great for finding things around the house or working out late at night. The Forerunner 570 only has a display flashlight feature that isn't nearly as effective. Each device has a 5ATM water-resistance rating and Corning Gorilla Glass 3 on the front.
Garmin Venu 4 vs. Forerunner 570: Hardware and specs
In terms of hardware, the Garmin Elevate v5 heart rate sensor is the core of both the Venu 4 and Forerunner 570. The upgraded sensor suite includes a more-accurate heart rate monitor, plus extras like a skin-temperature sensor and blood-oxygen sensor. The features are inconsistent across the devices, though.
For example, despite both watches using the same Elevate v5 sensor, only the Venu 4 can access the ECG app for electrocardiogram readings. Additionally, it's harder to access skin-temperature graphs on the Forerunner 570 compared to other watches, like the Venu 4.
Both watches have versatile connectivity tech inside, including Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi, NFC, which enables device sync and features like Garmin Pay. There's more storage than before, as the Forerunner 570's onboard space has been upped to 8GB.
Category | Garmin Venu 4 | Garmin Forerunner 570 |
|---|---|---|
Size | 41mm: 41 x 41 x 12mm 45mm: 45 x 45 x 12.5mm | 42mm: 42.4 x 42.4 x 12.9mm 47mm: 47 x 47 x 12.9mm |
Materials | Case: Stainless steel and fiber-reinforced polymer Bezel: Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Protection | 5ATM, Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, 5 ATM |
Weight | 41mm: 46g 45mm: 56g | 42mm: 42g 47mm: 47g |
Display | 41mm: 1.2-inch (390x390) 45mm: 1.4-inch (454x454) AMOLED touchscreen, 2,000 nits | 42mm: 1.2" (390 x 390) 47mm: 1.4" (454 x 454) AMOLED |
Storage | 8GB | 8GB |
Battery life | 41mm: 10 days (3 w/ AOD), 15 GPS hours, 13 All-Systems GNSS hours, 12 multi-band GPS hours 45mm: 12 days (4 w/ AOD), 20 GPS hours, 19 All-Systems GNSS hours, 18 multi-band GPS hours | 42mm: 10 days (smartwatch mode), 18 hours (GPS-only GNSS mode) 47mm: 11 days (smartwatch mode), 18 hours (GPS-Only GNSS mode) |
Sensors | Elevate v5 HRM, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass, ECG, gyroscope, skin temperature | Elevate v5 HRM, SpO2, accelerometer, altimeter, compass, gyroscope |
Tracking | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS, SatIQ, All-Systems GNSS + Multi-Band | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, SatIQ, multi-band GPS |
Connectivity | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi, NFC | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi, NFC |
LED flashlight | ✔️ | ❌ |
The software experience on the Garmin Venu 4 and the Forerunner 570 is quite similar, and it's improved compared to past Garmin — and especially Forerunner — models. The Forerunner 570 has more "smart" features, and it includes a microphone and speaker for the first time to facilitate connected phone calls. Additionally, the new software experience adds more Connect IQ data fields, for a total of four, to the Forerunner 570.
Both the Forerunner 570 and Venu 4 get the same new-look software experience, and it's for the better. It's intuitive, with a notification panel, workouts, and widgets only a swipe away. There are also Morning and Evening reports, which can now suggest daily workouts.
In terms of battery life, both Garmin watches are stellar by smartwatch standards, but are low relative to Garmin's bar. You get 10 days of battery life in smartwatch mode for the Forerunner 570 and the Venu 4 — and that's for the small size. The larger sizes of the Venu 4 and Forerunner 570 can last up to 11 or 12 days, respectively. Even with daily workouts, both watches should last a few days on a single charge.
Garmin Venu 4 vs. Forerunner 570: Fitness and health
Fitness and health features are the name of the game for Garmin smartwatches, so how do the Venu 4 and Forerunner 570 compete in this regard? As mentioned, the Garmin Venu 4 is better for advanced health metrics, with full support for heart-rate monitoring, blood-oxygen sensing, skin-temperature readings, and ECG recordings. The Forerunner 570 can handle some of those, but not all of them. Considering most mainstream smartwatches offer all those features these days, it's perplexing the Forerunner 570 doesn't.
The Forerunner 570's five onboard buttons make it easier to use for high-intensity interval training than the Venu 4. Both watches have the Garmin Run Coach, which can help you train for your next race with personalized workout plans. There are new sport types available on either watch, with over 80 total to choose from.
In terms of specialized run features, the Forerunner 570 offers AutoLap by Timing Gate detection, Projected Race Time predicting, and Suggested Finish Line estimates. For serious runners, these can be seriously cool — AutoLap can detect a race's course markers and automatically snap your GPS signal to them, ensuring accurate recording of a crowded race with wide routes.
Which should you buy?
For most fitness buffs, the Garmin Venu 4 is the better way to spend your $550. It has the same Garmin Elevate v5 sensor you'll find inside the Forerunner 570, but the Venu 4 adds ECG support. On top of that, there are perks like a built-in LED flashlight that make the Venu 4 more helpful on a daily basis. With a stainless steel bezel and a refined case designed, the Venu 4 doesn't look out of place when work as an everyday smartwatch.
Meanwhile, the Garmin Forerunner 570 is a specialized option for serious runners only. If you're the kind of runner that needs five tactical button for precise and quick mid-run controls, grab the Forerunner. The same goes for anyone that cares about the Forerunner 570's lightweight design and strap compared to the Venu's thick and heavy design.
I'd buy the Forerunner 570 in a heartbeat, because if I ever step foot in a gym, it's to get on a treadmill. Many weightlifters and strength trainers are the opposite — their workouts are done in gyms and on mats. For those buyers, or anyone that wants a full-size smartwatch that can pass with workwear or athleisure, the Venu 4 is the best option.
Premium health watch
The Garmin Venu 4 is a unique offering for people that need more advanced health and fitness metrics than the average smartwatch provides, but isn't a specialized runner, hiker, or cyclist. Instead, the Venu 4 does a lot of things well, making it great for gym nuts who mix up workout types.
For runners only
Garmin's Forerunner 570 is excellent for run tracking a performance training, but that comes at the expense of general health and smartwatch features. The design may be too flashy for everyday wear, and now-basic features like ECG readings and offline maps are missing.
Get the latest news from Android Central, your trusted companion in the world of Android

Brady is a tech journalist for Android Central, with a focus on news, phones, tablets, audio, wearables, and software. He has spent the last three years reporting and commenting on all things related to consumer technology for various publications. Brady graduated from St. John's University with a bachelor's degree in journalism. His work has been published in XDA, Android Police, Tech Advisor, iMore, Screen Rant, and Android Headlines. When he isn't experimenting with the latest tech, you can find Brady running or watching Big East basketball.
