What you need to know
- Apple and Google are being sued by game developer Ubisoft.
- A lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles, May 15, over sales of a game called Area F2.
- Ubisoft claims the game is a 'carbon copy' of Rainbow Six: Siege.
Game developer Ubisoft is suing both Apple and Google, over an app in their respective app stores it claims is a 'carbon copy' of Rainbow Six: Siege.
According to the lawsuit, Rainbow Six: Siege has 55 million registered players and an active user base of 3 million players a day. Teams also compete for "millions of dollars in prizes" in the game's competitive scene. As such, Ubisoft says that R6S is "among Ubisoft's most valuable intellectual properties" and that "virtually every aspect of AF2 is copied from R6S", including the operator selection screen, final scoring screen "and everything in between."
Area F2 is listed on Apple's App Store and the Google Play Store by developer Qookka Games. This is the name Alibaba's Hong Kong-based Ejoy.com Ltd does business under. Alibaba bought Ejoy back in 2017 to boost its standing in the mobile and online gaming sector. According to Bloomberg, the game was promoted through various social media campaigns through 2019 and was made available to the public on tablets and smartphones last month. According to the report, Ubisoft has previously notified both Apple and Google of the infringement to no avail.
Interestingly, Ubisoft is suing Apple and Google for enabling the distribution of the game, rather than Qookka Games itself for the initial infringement. It remains unclear at this stage whether Ubisoft plans to file a separate action in that regard.
The game has over 75,000 reviews on the Google Play Store, and more than 2,000 on Apple's App Store. A plethora of reviews on both platforms note the similarities to Ubisoft's Rainbow Six title.
I'd throw it out and tell them to file a suit against the developer.
Hey Ubisoft. If you're going to file a lawsuit about this blatant rip-off, go for the developer instead of the app stores.
I see the simpletons are in the comments section. It makes perfect sense to put a stop to the distribution of this in the first instance. Ubisoft can go after the developer in the second instance. Put in layman's terms they are tackling the actual problem first. Why would they allow the developer and the distributor to continue to profit, notably now the game has this "PR boost"? Stop the distribution first and go after the culprits second.
Get the best of Android Central in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to Android Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.