Galaxy S5 Mini

The Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini is official this morning, bringing the design language and features of Samsung's flagship smartphone to a smaller form factor at a lower price point. If you're wondering how the specs shake out, we've got all the details you need down below...

Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini specifications

Category Features
Network LTE Category4 : 150 Mbps DL, 50 Mbps UL, HSDPA 42.2Mbps, HSUPA 5.76 Mbps
Display 4.5" HD (720 x 1280) Super AMOLED
AP Quad Core 1.4 GHz
OS Android 4.4 (KitKat)
Camera Main (Rear): 8.0 MP AF with LED Flash
Sub (Front): 2.1MP (FHD)
Camera Features Shot & More, Virtual Tour Shot, S Studio
Video FHD@30fps
Video Codec H.263, H264(AVC), MPEG4, VC-1, Sorenson Spark, MP43, WMV7, WMV8, VP8
Video Format MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, WMV, ASF, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM
Audio Codec MP3, AMR-NB/WB, AAC/ AAC+/ eAAC+, WMA, Vorbis, FLAC
Value-Added Features IP67 Dust and Water Resistant, Ultra Power Saving mode, S Health, Private Mode/Kids Mode
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, NFC (LTE ver. only), Bluetooth® v4.0 LE, USB 2.0, A-GPS + GLONASS, IR Remote
Sensor Accelerometer, Digital compass, Gyro, Proximity, Hall, Ambient light, Fingerprint, Heart rate sensor
Memory* 1.5 GB RAM + 16GB Internal memory
microSD Slot (up to 64 GB)
* Memory options may be varied by product model or available regions
Dimension 131.1 x 64.8 x 9.1mm, 120g
Battery 2,100mAh

More: Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini forums


Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini specs



But you got to realize these are for folks who couldn't care any less what the specs are. You know, those folks who shouldn't have anything more technologically advanced than a solar calculator.

Yeah, but there are also folks who want a flagship device in a smaller form factor, and they're vastly underserved and haze a right to be miffed when OEMs just use flagship branding on midrange small form factor devices.

That would be me. I want a fast device, but I don't want the prerequisite 5.2" screen that goes along with it nowadays. 4.5" is about perfect.

I almost picked the Moto X over the Nexus 5 over size alone, and I've got fairly decent sized hands (5'10", long fingers)... Had it been cheaper off the bat and/or slightly better spec'd (no Spark support, lower res, etc) I would've gone for it. I hope the X+1 or whatever remains relevant in the same way.

Maybe in camera optics but I don't see it

Posted from my Nexus 7 2013 running Android L or Samsung galaxy S5

We are cooking with fire! This is around the same size of my RAZR M, this goes on the lost of potential phone upgrades, here's hoping it comes to Verizon.

Posted via Droid Razr M on the Android Central App

Hmmm. So it's a slight upgrade to my Samsung Galaxy S3. I think I'll pass.......

Posted via Android Central App

I love how whenever Motorola does something with specs like these, they're praised...and when Samsung does it everyone says they suck. like the amount of hate they receive is absolutely not necessary.

Posted via One M8

The real complaint here is that Samsung is making a gimped version of the flagship when they really want the flagship but with a smaller form factor. We already know what's inside the main s5. People are feeling cheated.

Posted via Android Central App

Motorola wrapped the Moto X up in a tiny package with identical hardware but a smaller screen and called it the Droid Mini. Samsung cut this thing off at the knees.

But the DROID MINI is stuck on Verizon.

Posted via Android Central App (Moto X)