Android One

Pure Android in a Google-backed $100 smartphone

This year's Google IO developer conference wasn't just about the upcoming Android L release and the design changes coming with that version. One of the keynote's most important announcements was packed into a two-minute segment at the start of the event. Android One, as Android chief Sundar Pichai explained, was designed to level the playing field for smartphones in developing markets, making it easier for smaller phone makers in these countries to ship relatively high-quality stuff at relatively low price points.

Three months later we're seeing the first fruits from this endeavor, as Android One arrives in India. We've got our hands on the Micromax Canvas A1, one of the first Android One phones to go on sale. And what we've found is a surprisingly speedy vanilla Android handset with a few tweaks for the Indian market.

Android One

What is Android One?

From a Western perspective, it's easy to draw parallels between Android One and the Nexus or Google Play edition programs (or even the rumored Android Silver endeavor). In reality, the purpose and execution of Android One is very different. Hardware components are selected by Google, which also takes the lead on software for these devices. From there, local OEMs can add relevant apps and tweak the external hardware to add their own flavor. (The current Android One lineup includes similar-looking devices from Spice and Karbonn, for instance.)

Essentially, the goal is for Android One to facilitate the spread of Google-controlled Android among the next billion (or two billion, or more) smartphone buyers by offering a compelling entry-level product, aided by local OEMs. In turn, the fact that manufacturers won't need to worry about software or sourcing hardware components means they can turn around products more quickly. From Google's perspective, Android One lets the maintain more control than is possible in the wild west that is the general Android ecosystem, and ensure that Google services and Google's design language are front and center.

Android OneAndroid One

For the purposes of this article we're looking at the Micromax Canvas A1. The two other Android One handsets available in India right now, the Spice Dream Uno and Karbonn Sparkle V, feature the same internal hardware in similar (though somewhat tweaked) chassis.

The device we have sells for Rs. 6499 in India — around $100 U.S. without a contract.

Android One

Android One — The hardware

It's clear Google's had a hand in the design of the first-generation Android One hardware. Even aside from visual cues like the Nexus 5-style circular earpiece and rear speaker, the Canvas A1 is, like recent Nexus devices, basically a vessel for Android. You'll find few distractions around the screen, and the battery door is covered with soft-touch plastic with minimal branding.

Android One delivers as much hardware muscle as some more expensive phones.

The in-hand feel is comfortable — more rounded than the N5, and despite the presence of removable battery door the device feels sturdy and well-built. There's a standard collection of ports and buttons — power and volume on the right, microUSB down below, headphone jack up top. Around the back, a large faux-metal camera bump protrudes through the back panel. And behind that back panel you'll find a microSD slot — highly recommended due to the limited internal storage — alongside two microSIM slots and a 1700mAh removable battery.

On the inside, Android One delivers as much hardware muscle as more expensive phones like the Moto G, though with fewer bells and whistles. There's a quad-core Metiatek chip running the show, with four cores clocked at 1.3GHz, 1GB of RAM and an ARM Mali 400MP GPU.

Android One

It's not going to run Crysis anytime soon, but still, it's kind of ridiculous how fast this device feels considering the price tag. The Canvas A1 is as responsive as phones four or five times its price. And this is a £65 phone. Seriously. Apple sells cables that cost more than this thing.

Apple sells cables that cost more than this phone.

But when you're selling a phone so cheaply, something's got to give, and you don't need to look far to see where money's being saved. There's just 2.27GB of available internal flash, of which 1.6GB was left after installing a few basic apps. (Though as we'll discuss later, apps can be moved to the SD card to free up space.) And the display is also a pretty basic 4.5-inch WVGA panel (480x854) behind a plastic screen that gets gunked up with finger grease pretty easily. That said, it offers better viewing angles than the HTC Desire 510, a more expensive phone — though one with differing priorities. And despite the low pixel density and subdued colors, it's not horrible-looking. Not surprising considering it's an IPS panel, not the bog-standard LCD you might expect.

Android One screen

Similarly, the camera setup is unspectacular — a basic 5-megapixel rear shooter with LED flash — though you do get panorama, photosphere, lens blur, HDR and other effects to play with. Around the front there's an even more basic 2.4-megapixel shooter. Don't expect too much out of either, as even in well-lit conditions we encountered plenty of noise from both front and rear cameras.

Android OneAndroid One

Micromax Canvas A1 — Android One specs

Category Features
CPU 1.3GHz quad-core
RAM 1GB
Storage 4GB (2.27GB available) + microSD
Display 4.5-inch FWVGA (854x480) IPS LCD
Frequencies GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
WCDMA 850/2100MHz (up to 21Mbps/5.76Mbps)
Battery 1700mAh removable
Other GPS, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor, Light sensor, Magnetic sensor

Android One software and features

For the most part you're looking at "stock" Google Android, just as you'd get on a Nexus or Google Play edition phone. The software is built and maintained by Google, and as such you're good for "up to two years" of updates to subsequent versions of the OS.

So what's different? Well, Micromax has loaded a handful of apps on top of the standard Google suite —

  • Amazon: The same Amazon shopping app you'd get on the Play Store in any country.
  • AskMe.com: An Indian classified ads app.
  • FM Radio: A no-brainer for emerging markets — gives you unlimited music playback even when mobile data is unavailable or expensive.
  • Hike: An Indian IM app.
  • M!Live: A web shortcut to Micromax's web-based app portal.

Android One

Some additional features have been added to fit with Android One's target market, however. As it's a dual-SIM phone, you'll find SIM configuration settings under Settings > SIM cards, letting you choose your default SIM for calls, data and SMS.

You'll also need a microSD card to take screenshots or photos; due to the limited internal storage space the phone will flat-out refuse to take these if you don't have an SD card installed. On top of that, you'll want to send heavier apps over to the external storage wherever possible. Google has reimplemented the ability to move apps to the SD card in the Android One firmware, a smart move given the limited internal storage.

Aside from that, it's more or less identical to what you'd find on a Nexus 5. The Google Now launcher brings predictive search to your home screen, while Chrome serves as your default browser, and the entire suite of Google Play applications are present and correct.

Android One

Some other bits worth mentioning —

  • You can unlock the bootloader in the usual way, with the fastboot oem unlock command. The bootloader UI is a little more basic than we're used to dealing with, though, with a mostly text-based layout.
  • Out of the box, Android One runs Android 4.4.4 KitKat, build KPW53, and a Google-built Linux 3.4.67 kernel dated Aug. 20.
  • The experimental ART runtime is available in the usual place under Developer Options, if you're feeling adventurous.
  • The codename of the device we're using is "sprout." Go figure.

Android One

The bottom line

The first-generation Android One hardware isn't going to turn the heads of those used to premium smartphones, nor is it designed to do so. Instead it's a cookie-cutter template intended to spawn dozens of $100 smartphones that are actually decent, while giving Google greater control over this new family of devices for emerging markets. Just like Android Wear, when you sign on with Android One you're playing by Google's rules — and that makes sense given the assistance Google's offering, and the likely razor-thin margins involved.

Android One gives Google control over the platform in emerging markets.

What's more, as the high end of the smartphone market becomes increasingly saturated, Android One allows Google's OS to expand its reach into markets with plenty of room to grow.

Android One generation one is a promising start, but things are only going to get cheaper (and more competitive) from here onwards. This year's $100 smartphone is next year's $50 device; future Android One templates could incorporate features reserved for premium handsets just a few years ago.

It's an important part of Android's future, and an area we'll be watching with increasing interest.

 

Reader comments

This is Android One

123 Comments

Time is on its side. Specs will improve and costs will continue to go down (or stay the same relative to spec) with economies of scale. Texting, email and viewing mobile webpages vs nothing. For $100. That's pretty great.

Totally agree. nexus cost about $500 in India so this is huge for emerging market.
Now if Google could do something to promote it

Actually, google is taking steps to promote this. There is an extensive TV ad campaign, both by Google as well as the OEMs.
True that the online presence of these Ads isn't negligible. But that has to do with the target audience in India.

Source: I live in India

Will these companies be making any money with these extremely cheap phones?

Posted via Android Central App

These companies make similar cheap devices. so with software and hardware support from google they make even more than what they use to make

I don't think so. Android one is google's answer at trying to stop oem's cutting google services and replace it with theirs, similarly to what has been happening in china. Google is basically non-existent in china and all the local vendors are using their own services fine. What those oem's are now finding out is that google do not care about the oem's success as long as google gets theirs.

Those oem's frankly did not learn anything from the pc industry, to sell devices that cheap is not a long term business model. The hardware is a commodity now, the only way to make any sort of money in this market is through services. Essentially that's what android one is trying to stop. If all those oem's starts to offer their own services instead of google's then one can see how it will cut a big chunk of their revenue.

If you ask me android one did not bring anything new to the table. Those oem's are already selling $50 android phones, even $25 if you look deep enough, so what exactly is android one trying to solve? What, $10, $5 or zero dollar smartphones. Android one main job is to try to keep google services in play nothing else.

Google is non-existant in China because the Chinese government has blocked their services. If a company wants to sell an Android phone in China, they need to provide alternatives.

My point is android is doing great in China without Google which proves it can be done elsewhere. Those oem's are not stupid and I am sure they know google have done everything to pushed the hardware cost down to zero. Once that happens they have to look elsewhere for margins and right now offering your own services is the obvious choice, not saying it will be easy, but it can be done and China is the perfect example.

these OEM(micromax, Karbonn etc) dont even have any service. what service are you talking about?
even with their service all they would make its hardware profit. if you have looked at their phone they have their own apps which cannot make any profit for them. also other devices these OEM make do come with google service in it. this is not like china

China doesn't prove anything. In China you have state sponsored companies (like OPPO) and highly censored internet access. This isn't the case most places and is something China can only maintain for so long.

Forget the razor thin margins on the hardware--think of all the people in developing countries that will be buying apps, music, videos, etc, through Google Play.

when's it coming to the states?

I would like to see more google controlled software. GPE devices are alright. Not a lot of "new" devices on there right now.

micro sd + google updates? can really give moto g and other low tier phones a run for their money

Yeah, might be good as an emergency device for your kids and whatnot. Not so much as a everyday device for an adult I think.

I would love to get one of these as a travel phone since I assume it is SIM unlocked. Also as a test phone for application development.

Amazing how Google flipped on the no SD card issue... I distinctly remember almost every "pure Android" fan saying SD cards were obsolete and not needed not too long ago... BTW the front looks exactly like my old Galaxy 1 (which I like actually).

I am sure this was mostly driven by cost. Adding an sd card slot is much cheaper than adding storage. And you can't realistically expect a user to get by on (at best) 4GB.

Adding such SD-card support means Fat32 typically must be licensed from MS. You'd think 8GB might be cheaper than a slot and a licence fee, but I have no idea. Apparently not. Maybe they are already all covered by the MS android OEM deal already..

I think this really drives home how incredibly bloated the likes of Touchwiz is. The Galaxy S5 takes up more than half of the storage on a 16gb device for the OS. 8+GB of OS. Of that, less that 2gb is actually Android. Talk about a fat, bloated sack of...

This has some interesting trade-offs compared to the moto E. The E has a gorilla glass screen, a larger battery and it has a much higher DPI.
The one has a better CPU and a front camera.
-Edit- I didn't realize that the moto e is $130. Doesn't sound like much but I suppose a 30% markup makes a difference.

I probably would take the moto e for the glass screen. Better feel

Posted via Moto G
R.I.P My Cyanogenmod S4 :'(

Main drawback of moto e compared to Google 1- it doesn't have a front facing camera.

Posted via Android Central App

The Indian Mobile industry is very very competitive. A lot of people usually have a couple of SIM's to get the benefit from two networks. One might just be used for Data or SMS while another is used to make the calls. There are a lot of people on pre-paid numbers and they would move to an alternate network/plan as soon as it was economically viable.

You'd think with the lower internal storage, Google would ease off including all of its applications.

Cloud storage isn't an excuse in countries that have poor coverage. And if space is so small you need an SD card to take pictures, they can do without their apps being pre-loaded.

What apps, exactly, would you remove? The apps that are included are basic things that a lot of people use. And they're not that bad. Some of you people need to get over yourselves.

Posted via Android Central App

Out of the box Android and all of Google's apps take up 1.75gb of the total storage. There's not a lot of fat there to trim., iOS8 takes at least 1.9gb (and somehow 6+GB to install?).

Pretty much the definition of Apple users sometkmes. I know folks who don't do anything more hardware intensive than surf the web that SWEAR they need a macbook because marketing tells them so. Idiots.

Pretty sure this year's $100 phone won't cost $50 next year. The moto g being largely unchanged is proof of that. Moore's law does not apply here

n5

I took that comment to mean this $100 phone will sell for $50 next year, when it is replaced by an updated model for $100. You can see this happen with some of the low end Lumia Windows phones. The 520 from last year can be had for around $50.

"The 520 from last year can be had for around $50."
Yeah, that would be price correction. it's not worth more than $50. I have one.

So Android One is a single device, rather than a family of devices (e.g., Nexus) ?

Posted via Android Central App

I could be wrong, but it seems the Nexus One is the template for the low end smartphones the way the Nexus is the template for the high end smartphones. 

No. Android one is a set of specs that OEM's have to meet. There are at least three manufacturers of android one phones in India, all having virtually the same specs. See this video on YouTube:

Android One | Micromax Canvas A1 Unboxing and Han…: http://youtu.be/IL6KRMZf-X0

Posted via the Android Central App

These would make a nice android media player device. Like the look of them too. Would be cool if they brought these to the states. Love my moto g but competition never hurts.

Posted via Android Central App

Anyone know how I could get my hands on one in the states? Seems like a pretty good play around phone. Unlocked bootloader and all.

I picked up the Maxwest Android Virtue (Kit Kat) from YIPPZ. This phone has a 5 inch screen, 1.3GHz quad core, 8.0 mp camera and is Dual SIM. This phone has tethering & wifi built in. It's manufactured unlocked.
It's super fast! I love it, I can change my plan anytime I want to or even choose another MVNO carrier and I am not stuck in a contract!!

Not pure Android. I hate it when people act like Google's phones are pure Android. I wish nexus phones shipped with the "pure" android browser, launcher and messaging app. They do not.

It's as pure as you can get it and you can unlock the bootloader with some simple commands like any Nexus, stop complaining or would you rather it be locked down tighter than Fort Knox like all of the phones offered by major manufacturers?

The price seems nice, but I would have expected Google to deliver something more for $100.
Considering that you get a >$600 flagship Nexus for half the price it's a bit a bummer to have a ~$100 phone for ~$100. But in same time, I guess this user base won't spend so mush on the Play Store so it might be a reason for not subsidize the price I guess.
My second disappointment is why Android One is only targeted at development countries? Here in NA we are forced to get crap phones with a skin that downgrade even more the performance! Seriously, Google need to push more stock Android!

I have a moto e and for most of what I do on it it is as good as my nexus 5. If it had the same cameras and processor as these phones it would do pretty much everything I need from a phone.

Posted via the Android Central App

If Google can put an SD card slot and removable battery in a $100 phone, why can't they manage to do it in the Nexus line? Especially given the weak battery they put in the last one.

Because the Nexus line represents the highest of ideals and standards (supposedly) while Android One is the cheapest of the cheap. Both are great, but they have very, very different goals. One is a pattern for how to do things 'right', the other is a program meant to get as manybdevices in as many hands as possible.

I m from India n I have moto g 2nd gen and Micromax Android one, and believe me android one is faster and better at multi tasking. The best part of this is obviously 2 years update promised, As Micromax almost never gives any update to their product.

A while back Google got annoyed with all the super cheap android phones from no-name manufacturers. They'd skimp out on design or quality control, they'd just slap a phone together that was barely stable, throw Android on it and release it. The result was Android crashed a lot and people blamed Android. So about 3 months ago they did something very smart, they released various 'reference designs' of cheap hardware. Basic schematics that any no-name manufacturer could use in order to build a cheap phone, but still be stable (Google's engineers vetted the design, made sure the circuit board design, cpu, memory, etc. were all compatible with each other and with Android). The idea is now instead of flimsy designs, a no-name India or China manufacturer can throw together a cheap, but stable, Android phone. Google is happy because now their OS can run stable, and that puts more Android phones in the hands of people. There are now 3 different Android phones out there based on the "Android One" (Google's name for the schematic) design. The cost of the phones are $100 USD and the reviews are... positive! Stable, surprisingly quick/responsive, and they have Android 4.4, the latest and greatest. Awesome, I want one just as a spare backup or a loaner phone.

There are three phones launched with the same specs and more or less same price. They are priced around same as Lumia 520 and Moto E.

So Moto E for another 10$ is more tempting.

Central and Eastern Europe would happily welcome Android One too. There is definitely a market here for non-rubbish 100$ phones.

The One name needs to be retired. There is the entire HTC One line, OnePlusOne, and now the Android One. You'd think that marketing would be able to come up with something different.

The 1700mAh battery makes this phone a bit hard to imagine in my pocket.

Not for me or anyone in my family.

This has a notification light but it works wonky... only sms light it up...and it's faster than my stock 4.4.2 note2. .

The user experience on this Android One phone is unbelievable when you consider the price tag. Out of box its flawless with exception of call quality [Moto X vs this one]

I've already rooted and installed xposed. Also put a 32 GB class 10 card to boost performance.
Its sort of not-so-rich man's Nexus

Anybody else find it crazy that these "entry level" phones include expandable MicroSD storage (with app transfer) while the "flagship" 2014 Moto X includes neither???