Since 2016, when the original Pixel debuted, it has felt like Google just needed one more year, and then another, to make the brand a household name — to be broadly considered a success.
And judging by the Pixel's outsized influence in the Android smartphone market relative to its reported sales numbers, I'd say Google can celebrate that success. Its phones are synonymous with great cameras, with innovative and useful software features, and with playful if divisive approaches to smartphone design.
But influence doesn't sell phones, and Google's Sisyphean journey to bring its own Android experience to more people just hasn't really worked. At the high-end, Pixel phones could never compete with Samsung, LG, Huawei, and OnePlus (among others) on sheer brute-force specs; and on the value side, Pixels cost too much to attract the value-conscious buyers of Motorola and Nokia products. As the classic Stealers Wheel song goes, they were stuck in the middle with you.
In 2019, though, Google seemingly found its footing with the Pixel 3a, a $399 handset that refactored how the company builds phones. Its success, and the Pixel 4 series' subsequent failure, made it clear what needed to happen: as nearly every smartphone maker went higher and higher, exploring new materials, form factors, and technologies, Google wasn't going anywhere.
In 2020, still a year away from the ambitious Pixel 6 series, the middle was exactly where Google wanted to be.
Google Pixel 5: Price and availability
If you're able to find it on sale, the Pixel 5 usually costs around $500 USD and is available in two colors, Sorta Sage (green) and Just Black, and in one size configuration — there is no Pixel 5 XL, unless you count the cheaper Pixel 4a 5G (you shouldn't). It's also limited to a single storage size, 128GB, with no option for expansion through microSD.
The Pixel 5 launched in nine countries: Australia, France, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, the U.S., and Canada. Regional availability varies — for instance, brand new Pixel 5s are easier to come across in Europe than North America. In the U.S., for instance, Google has already sold through
This review was written primarily using a Canadian unlocked Sorta Sage Pixel 5 connected to 5G on Telus, a national carrier. It was connected to Wi-Fi most of the time and a mix of LTE and 5G when out of the house.
As of October 2021, just weeks away from the likely launch date of the Pixel 6, the Pixel 5 is available at discounted prices at some retailers, as opposed to the $700 launch price. However, owing to the current global chip shortage new Pixel, new Pixel 5 models are difficult to come by.
Google Pixel 5: Design and performance
|Category||Google Pixel 5|
Full HD+ (2340x1080)
90Hz refresh rate
Gorilla Glass 6
|Operating System||Android 11 (upgradeable to Android 12)|
|Processor||Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G|
|Rear Camera 1||12.2MP primary camera|
|Rear Camera 2||16MP ultra-wide camera|
|Memory||8GB of RAM|
|Charging||18W wired charging|
15W wireless charging
5W reverse wireless charging
|Connectivity||Sub-6 5G (worldwide)|
Sub-6, mmWave 5G (US)
|Colors||Sorta Sage, Just Black|
|Dimensions||144.7 x 70.4 x 8mm|
The Pixel 5 is made of aluminum, which I feel like I haven't said about a phone in a very long time (I miss you, HTC). But this aluminum frame is unlike anything I've held before: the back and sides are painted over with a porous, slightly coarse material, which has thankfully so far been resistant to scratches and fingerprints.
Holding the Pixel 5 is one of my favorite things about using it: it's weighted perfectly, with just the right amount of heft to feel substantial without burdening your pocket. Its narrow frame engenders a comfort in the hand, so typing feels natural and consistent, while the flat Corning Gorilla Glass 6 on the front is raised ever-so-slightly away from the frame, ensuring solid taps on the screen.
We're talking millimeters of difference between the Pixel 5 and its Pixel 4 and Pixel 3 predecessors, but minor changes in material, weight, and dimensions add up to a significant difference. After just a few days, this quickly became my favorite Pixel ever to just pick up and use.
Some of that praise needs to be heaped at the display, or at least the decision to get rid of the bezels above and below the screen. With very minor breaks between the 6-inch AMOLED display and the frame, the Pixel 5 looks and feels modern in ways its predecessors didn't, and that Google was able to hit such a considerable screen size, even at a tall 19.5:9 aspect ratio, without increasing the overall size of the Pixel 3 and 4, feels like a win.
Of course, those decisions come with three major trade-offs, and I'm not happy with any of them. The first is that the Pixel 5 doesn't have the face unlock and Soli sensors of the Pixel 4.
The latter I can live with — no one will miss Motion Sense, I promise — but I thought Google's implementation of secure 3D face unlock, and the relatively widespread adoption across the developer community, heralded good things for the future of Android biometrics. But here we see Google prevaricate in the name of aesthetics (and, according to spokespeople I talked to, cost) and revert to a rear fingerprint unlock.
That fingerprint sensor is good in a classic way, and works perfectly. Instead of using an in-display fingerprint sensor, which is slower and less secure, Google made the decision to put experience before spec, and in this case, I think it was the right move. Still, I miss how quickly the Pixel 4 unlocked.
The second trade-off is the loss of the wide-angle front-facing camera from the Pixel 3 series. I loved this addition to the Pixel in 2018, and thought it made it the best phone for taking selfies, period. In 2019, with all of the sensors crowding the top of the Pixel 4, Google combined the 75-degree and 97-degree fields of view into a single still-wide 87-degree camera. With the Pixel 5, that's been reduced to 80-degrees, so if you're someone like me who prefers taking wider selfies, this change is going to feel like a setback of sorts.
The third trade-off, which is probably going to be more significant for some people, is the reduction in sound quality over previous Pixel phones. Famously, the Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 featured dual front-facing speakers, and they were loud enough, and even bassy enough, to rival the best in the industry. With the Pixel 5, Google still claims its phone has dual speakers, but the front-facing element is now hidden behind the display, using a transducer projecting through the glass.
The sound is thin and relatively quiet, which forces the downward-facing speaker to work twice as hard. Cover up that bottom port and the phone barely makes a peep, even at the highest volume, and comparing the sound output to the Pixel 3 or Pixel 4, or even any modern flagship from Samsung or OnePlus, makes it clear Google took some liberties with the driver itself. There's a boominess to the sound that borders on distortion, veiling the midrange and treble. It's Google's weakest speaker in years, and a total disappointment.
I'm getting these gripes out of the way early on because they're relatively minor and they're really among the only ones I have about the phone. Returning to the display, the 6-inch OLED panel is of very high quality, calibrated well with accurate-looking colors and a lack of banding or blue tinge that you get with some panels in this price tier. It doesn't get quite bright enough for my liking in direct sunlight — certainly dimmer than the Pixel 4 series — but it's fine in most situations, and I'll take that compromise in exchange for the expansive screen real estate in a smaller body, especially with the faster 90Hz display.
There's a part of me that's disappointed Google didn't increase the Pixel 5's refresh rate to 120Hz after having luxuriated in that additional silkiness with the OnePlus 9 Pro and Galaxy S21 Ultra this past year, but given the Pixel 4's awful battery life, I'm not surprised Google didn't push any display metric boundaries.
Let's turn our attention to the other elephant in the room, the decision to step down from a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800-series chip to the Snapdragon 765G the Pixel 5 shares with its Pixel 4a 5G counterpart (as well as the OnePlus Nord, LG Velvet and Wing, and others). Paired with 8GB of RAM, I wouldn't blame you for being skeptical about Google's assertion that this mid-range chip, which has roughly the same compute power as the Snapdragon 845 found in the Pixel 3, is good enough for its top-of-the-line Pixel.
Let me put those fears to rest: the Snapdragon 765G is great. It's great in every other phone we've tried it on since mid-2020, and it's even better here. There's so much legroom remaining in today's flagship phone chips that it often feels like that old adage about how humans only use 10% of their brains; unless you're going out of your way to stress your phone all the time, there's no way you're taking full advantage of a chip like the Snapdragon 888 in today's most expensive handsets.
This isn't meant to apologize for Google's decision, either; I stress tested the crap out of this thing. I used it side by side with the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which is a mid-tier phone with a far more technically powerful Snapdragon 865, and the Pixel kept up but for a couple of occasions where apps took a beat longer to load. (For what it's worth the Pixel has 8GB of RAM compared to the FE's 6GB.) I even tried it next to the OnePlus 8T, and you know what? It did fine. I'm not saying the Pixel 5 wins by any means, but it keeps up, and that's impressive.
You will notice a few instances where the Snapdragon 765G lags behind even 2019's Snapdragon 855: photo processing speeds. While the cameras, as you'll see next, are still as good as ever, Google's putting a lot of pressure on the phone's brain to turn frames into photos, and you'll likely notice that pulling up one of those computationally-heavy photos takes a few more beats right after taking it.
I did play a few games on the phone, and everything from PUBG Mobile to Dead Cells to Oddmar played identically to any other flagship — smoothly. The only potential caveat is that because the bezels around the phone are so slim, you may find yourself, as I did, with accidental touches when cradling the Pixel in both hands.
One final thing before we move on: it's refreshing to acknowledge that the Pixel 5 is the first premium phone from Google without any showstopping issues at launch. After the original Pixel's software bugs, the Pixel 2 XL's display problems, the Pixel 3's memory issues, and the Pixel 4's atrocious battery life, it's a relief to see Google release a product free of drama. This phone works, and it works as it should.
Google Pixel 5: Cameras
Portions of this section were written by Hayato Huseman
Pixels are cameras first. That's been the adage since the Pixel 2 and it continues to be the case now. But when the company proved that it could port the vast majority of its camera performance to the $399 Pixel 3a in 2019, the question on my mind became, does camera hardware even matter?
That answer with the Pixel 5 is... complicated. The phone has the same 12.2MP primary sensor that Pixel phones have had for four years, but once again Google's tweaked the output pipeline to satisfy what users are craving today: contrasty, warm photos that are easy to share on social media. The adjustments are subtle but welcome, and I still like the photos on the Pixel 5 better than virtually any other device. But it's also clear that Google's hit the software limits of what this relatively small phone sensor can pull off in hardware.
To its credit, Google didn't fix what wasn't broken: in good lighting, the photos taken on the Pixel 5 are mostly identical to those of the Pixel 4. Ever-so-slightly warmer, as mentioned, but you won't notice the differences unless you're looking for them. What that means is you're getting among the best, most consistent photo quality in almost any lighting condition and of any subject.
In particular, Google takes care to retain facial detail in portraits; it doesn't eliminate shadow detail to get a brighter image; it doesn't ramp up color saturation when you're taking a photo of your dinner; and despite the name, HDR+ doesn't make landscapes look cartoony or fake. It may not sound like much, but you can take for granted Google's processing will make the right decisions, from exposure to contrast to saturation to highlights to segmentation, in almost every scene.
There are a few improvements to note this time around over previous Pixels. Google has added Night Sight to the main camera mode, which means you no longer have to explicitly activate the Pixel's low-light mode to get the most out of your shot. Google told me that it was "incredibly difficult" to do this properly, likely since finding the threshold between "regular" multi-frame photography, as Google does it, and the "extended" multi-frame photography of Night Sight is more challenging than we realize. Either way, it's a relief not having to care about toggling night mode, and the photos themselves look better than ever.
That's right: Google once again managed to improve its low-light results using the same sensor and lens combination as before. The company said it made improvements to the Night Sight algorithms that allow it to reduce noise even further, retain detail in subjects, and ensure colors are more accurate. In my testing, the results were almost identical to the Pixel 4 in areas of low light — outdoors at night with the subject lit by a street lamp or the moon — but much better in ultra-low light, as in a pitch-black room. The Pixel 5 did a better job keeping focus on a subject and keeping noise down.
The Pixel 5 also benefits from Night Sight portraits, where the phone is able to determine a foreground subject well enough to carve it out and blur the background. I had very mixed results here, and the success was largely determined by how much ambient light was available to the sensor. If you're sitting in a room lit by a few bulbs, Night Sight portraits should turn out well; outdoors, or in rooms with meager lighting, I'd just let regular Night Sight do its thing.
The Pixel 5 also debuts Google's new Portrait Light features, which exist in two places: the camera app itself and, during post-production, in the Google Photos app. It's important to make this distinction, as confusing as it is, because only the Pixel 5 right now benefits from both.
Here's a demo of Portrait Light on the Pixel 5, which I think is a really interesting and underrated addition. The effect can be stark or subtle, but it rarely crosses the line into artifice, and that's to Google's huge credit. pic.twitter.com/ga7XhC7FFjHere's a demo of Portrait Light on the Pixel 5, which I think is a really interesting and underrated addition. The effect can be stark or subtle, but it rarely crosses the line into artifice, and that's to Google's huge credit. pic.twitter.com/ga7XhC7FFj— Daniel Bader (@journeydan) October 14, 2020October 14, 2020
Portrait Light is not a new concept; the iPhone X debuted several pre-canned Portrait Lighting effects, like Stage Light, Contour Light, and others. But Google takes things to a new and very accessible level, since it's possible to achieve the two most popular styles, stage, and contour, with little effort.
Taking a photo in Portrait Mode automatically enables Portrait Light and optimizes it to the extent Google thinks is necessary for the scene (Google says it also applies Portrait Light to faces taken in regular mode, but to a lesser extent). The effect can be jarring, largely because lighting faces artificially is tricky (if you've ever had studio photos taken, or watched the behind-the-scenes of a YouTube video, you know how much equipment is involved) and phone sensors are typically too small to capture enough data to make adding light a fool's errand.
But as Google successfully showed with HDR+ in landscapes, and Night Sight in dark scenes, it can use machine learning to figure out just the right amount of light to add to a face without it seeming artificial. Most of the time, it just works. And if you're not happy with it, you can head into the Google Photos app and change the severity of the lighting or where the shadows in the scene sit.
I was consistently impressed with Portrait Light and its flexibility. Given that Pixel phones already take the best portrait photos in the Android ecosystem by dint of their ability to retain facial detail without oversharpening, Portrait Light just reinforces that lead.
Here's the confusing part: as part of an update in late 2020, the Pixel 4, 4 XL, and 4a gained the ability to apply Portrait Light in-camera. In addition, Portrait Light editing of existing photos arrived on all Pixels starting with the Pixel 3.
I should also mention that, despite my complaints about a narrower field of view, the selfie camera on the Pixel 5 is still one of the best in the business. Every mode that is available to the rear cameras — Night Sight, Portrait, and Portrait Night Sight, and Portrait Light— is also on the front, but video capture is limited to 1080p.
Elsewhere in the camera, there are two other additions and one removal worth talking about. Gone is the 2x telephoto lens of the Pixel 4, replaced by a fan-service ultra-wide lens. Why didn't Google just add an ultra-wide the way Apple did with the iPhone 11 Pro? Who knows — cost was likely the biggest factor — but it's an interesting and welcome change nonetheless.
Google justifies the change by saying the Pixel's Super Res Zoom feature is good enough that, at 2x, you won't be able to tell the difference between the Pixel 5 and the Pixel 4, which isn't true. Images shot at 2x on the Pixel 5 have much less detail and generally look more artificial — more digital — than on the Pixel 4. Makes sense. But would I rather have an ultrawide for dramatic landscape shots over the reduction of telephoto zoom quality? Absolutely.
The ultra-wide lens on the Pixel 5 won't win any awards for quality, sharpness, or reduction in barrel distortion, but it's a truly lovely addition to the Pixel camera arsenal, and long overdue. Google did a great job calibrating the ultra-wide to match the color science of the primary sensor, and overall it's a pleasure to use.
Then there's video. The Pixels have been rightly excoriated for their lackluster video, and like the call for an ultra-wide camera, Google spent some timing improving things here.
There's so much to talk about with regards to the Pixel 5's video capabilities. The Pixel 4 shot pretty mediocre footage, with virtually zero controls or settings to tweak, so any improvement is welcome here.
That all changes with the Pixel 5. Naturally, you can shoot in either 1080p or 4K at 30fps, but now there's a 60fps option, too. Google isn't kidding around here, either: 4K60 footage is buttery smooth, and just as well stabilized as its 1080p60 or 4K30 counterparts.
The Pixel also borrows a feature we've seen in recent phones from Samsung and the like: audio zoom. With this, the Pixel 5 uses its various mics to focus in and boost the audio when you zoom in to a particular subject, reducing the background noise around it. It's a handy feature, if a bit gimmicky, but that's of course not the only new feature.
Far more significant are the new video stabilization modes; in addition to the standard setting, which uses a combination of EIS and OIS to steady your shots, you can now choose from Locked, Active, and Cinematic Pan, each with their own advantages and drawbacks.
There's no telephoto lens on the Pixel 5, but the Locked shooting mode punches in to 2X anyway, and uses the surrounding data along with stabilization to create a "locked off" shot, almost as if you were shooting with a tripod. It works surprisingly well at canceling out any hand jitters, though if you really push it, you can start to notice the perspective correction warping in the corners.
Active mode mostly seems to be a stronger version of the standard stabilization setting. It's specialized for walking shots and any sort of action moments; Google demonstrates shooting from a jet ski in the camera software.
You can shoot anywhere from 1X to 5X in this mode, though oddly, the Pixel 5 actually leans on the ultra-wide lens for this shooting mode. Because of that, the image quality is dramatically softer than in other modes, and you're limited to just 1080p, rather than 4K.
Google says this is because the wider field of view from the ultrawide camera allows a more substantial crop than the primary, giving the company's stabilization algorithms additional breathing room to work their magic.
In practice, because of the severe reduction in video quality, I'd probably stick with the standard mode unless you're really moving quickly.
I think my favorite new shooting mode is Cinematic Pan, which automatically shoots in 60fps, then slows down and stabilizes your footage to create an ultra-smooth 30fps clip. It's a trick I used to do all the time when I had a 4K60-capable camera, since it allows you to create longer, steadier footage in a short amount of time. The results look great — just remember that not everything needs to be slow-mo. Use this mode sparingly.
Ultimately, the Pixel 5 still isn't going to top phones like the Xperia 1 III or Galaxy S21 Ultra when it comes to video. Each of these phones has far more manual control than Google offers, including the ability to shoot in various picture profiles and set manual focus. But considering how far behind previous Pixels have been, this is a huge step in giving the Pixel 5 a more well-rounded overall shooting experience, rather than just a great computational camera for photos.
Conversely, the Pixel's still photo lead is no longer assured, either. The Pixel 5 takes incredible photos in almost every lighting condition, but 2020 and beyond have proven that throwing pixels at the problem — the microscopic kind — actually works. Phones like the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra and OnePlus 9 Pro have comparatively massive primary sensors, with camera bumps to match, and while neither company is as nimble as Google in using software to solve hardware-related problems, they're getting a lot closer. In fact, it feels like every phone maker is improving faster than Google, and in some areas have surpassed it just by using larger, more modern sensors.
Google Pixel 5: Battery life
In 2019, I said that the Pixel 4 was "early to bed, early demise." The Pixel 4 XL was "a night vision camera that's dead by sunset." Both were great phones completely undermined by poor battery life, enough that Google hardware chief Rick Osterloh made structural changes within the Pixel hardware team to ensure that didn't happen again.
True to its word, the Pixel 5 fixes those battery woes. There's a 4,080mAh battery inside the phone, which is 46% larger than the 2,800mAh cell in the Pixel 4, and even bigger than the one in the 4 XL. It's a feat of engineering that Google managed to get such a huge battery in this phone, and it worked: I never ended the day with under 10% battery in my time testing the Pixel 5, and each had over five hours of screen-on-time.
Some of that extra uptime has to be thanks to the inherent efficiency of the Snapdragon 765G; some due to the subtle improvements to Adaptive Battery that were introduced earlier in 2020 with the Pixel 4a. But mostly it's because Google made the right decision to put a big honking cell in a phone with a relatively dim 1080p AMOLED panel.
Google's also got one additional ace up its sleeve, though I'll admit I rarely use it: Extreme Battery Saver. Taking the protocols of the Pixel's regular Battery Saver mode and ratching it to 11, Extreme Battery Saver essentially cuts off apps from doing anything in the background. They're only working when you have them open in front of you.
That means email or chat clients won't push new messages, and important background services like Covid-19 Exposure Notifications won't operate correctly unless whitelisted. It's a severe solution to the problem of battery longevity, and while I doubt it'll get much use in pockets of people who charge every night, it's certainly nice to have.
Also nice to have is wireless charging, an accomplishment Google made through the aluminum frame by literally carving a hole in the backplate. You obviously can't tell the hole is there — it's filled in with a resin and then painted over — but it's an engineering feat all the same. Wireless charging and water-resistance were the two features I really missed from the Pixel 4a, and I'm so glad they're here.
Google Pixel 5: Software
On the software front, there are only a few important things you need to know: the Pixel 5 comes with three years of updates (though it should be five) with monthly security patches and quarterly(ish) "Feature Drops."
And everything that was once exclusive to the Pixel 5 and Pixel 4a 5G eventually came to older Pixels. That's the trajectory of almost every Pixel-exclusive feature and likely won't change any time soon.
With Material You, Android is more colorful, with apps decorated in a selection of accent colors pulled from the Material palette to compliment your home screen background. It's a great way to make the most personal computer you own more personal to you, with a choice of subtle or punchy accents to match the feel of your background. Android 12 is curvier and chunkier, with a focus on big, rounded corners and large, meaningful text headers. It's a natural evolution of the Material Design aesthetic that started way back with Android 5.0 Lollipop.
So, on Pixels, Material You in Android 12 really is a whole new UI. It's still basically the same old Android under the hood, but the aesthetic changes are substantial, making it feel fresh and modern.
But the changes in Android 12 are more than just a fresh coat of paint. The new privacy dashboard helps you keep tabs on which apps are using sensitive permissions like location, microphone, and camera, and how often they're using them. When an app is tracking where you are or using your camera or mic, you'll see a little dot or icon up top in the status bar to let you know what's going on, and which app is responsible.
And for location in particular, Android 12 lets you control how much information apps can get. Whenever you're choosing to give an app this permission, you can decide whether it gets to know precisely where you are, or just an approximate location. It's a continuation of the trends started in Android 10 and Android 11 where you're able to give apps enough data to work properly without handing over more personal data than you need to.
There are a couple of interesting Pixel 5-only features available, too. An updated version of the Recorder app now lets you edit sections of a recording by deleting the generated text. I'm italicizing that because it's so freaking cool. Google is so confident in its transcription accuracy that it's willing to use it to reverse engineer the waveform. Just incredible.
Also neat is Hold for Me, a service that lets Google's Duplex AI spend time waiting for a customer service representative on your behalf.
Google's Pixel software experience is underappreciated. Even as companies like Samsung, OnePlus, Oppo, and others have slowly come to realize that simplicity and fluidity are almost always preferable to a smartphone user than an abundance of choice, Google still stands alone in trying to ship features instead of options.
After more than a decade of Nexus and Pixels, it may seem trite to say it, but you really don't understand just how enjoyable it is to use Android on a Pixel until you actually use one.
Google Pixel 5: Do you need to care about 5G?
One of the marquee features of the Pixel 5 is its support for 5G. Here in Canada, our carriers use sub-6Ghz 5G, which gives the phone speeds roughly equivalent to a decent LTE connection. That said, I retained a solid 5G connection the entire time I used the Pixel 5, and the experience was solid throughout. Even in late 2021, this remains one of the better values in 5G phones on the market outside of the Pixel 4a 5G.
In the U.S., things are a bit different: you're essentially paying a premium to buy a phone that includes Verizon's millimeter-wave 5G bands, which undermines some of the value Google is trying to achieve, especially if you don't plan to use the phone on that carrier.
And while Verizon is expanding its 5G network considerably lately, and Google is one of its longtime partners, it's still a little frustrating, especially when you know the phone could go for $100 less (that's what the exchange rate works out to when you factor in the price of the Pixel 5 in countries where mmWave 5G isn't a thing).
Of course, 5G will be consequential in the future even if it isn't today, and its presence is going to be a selling factor for devices through sheer force of marketing will — every phone vendor, carrier, and chipmaker has been hammering its importance to the future of mobility, even if that reality isn't yet realized. At this point, I'd say the addition of 5G in the Pixel 5 is a necessary evil; that Google decided to make a single version of the phone for U.S. and increase the price by $100 because of it, was the wrong move.
Google Pixel 5: Lightning round FAQ
Would you buy this over the Pixel 4a 5G?
I've been thinking about this question a lot lately, mainly in relation to whether the Pixel 5 provides enough value to justify its price tag, and I've come to the conclusion that it all depends on how much value you assign to some of Google's minor quality-of-life improvements, like the aluminum frame, like the Pixel 5's IP68 water resistance, and perhaps most of all, wireless charging.
I think that potential Pixel 5 owners would be much better served if there were two versions, a lower-priced model with sub-6 5G and a Verizon-specific model at a higher price, similar to the breakdown between Pixel 4a 5G models.
That said, as Hayato Huseman pointed out in his Pixel 4a 5G review, it's a great phone that's sort of painted into a corner by the Pixel 4a and Pixel 5. It's actually kind of a bargain, but it doesn't scream at you with value like the 4a or features like the Pixel 5.
How are the haptics?
So I originally wrote that the haptics are unchanged from previous models, but I'm wrong about that. There's a slight difference in quality between the Pixel 3 and 4, which had very clean and precise haptics, and the Pixel 5, which is still clean but a little less precise than on previous years. It's not a huge deal — it took me a few days to realize it — but it's definitely not the same motor as on the Pixel 4, which is disappointing.
How does the speaker-behind-the-display work?
There's a transducer behind the OLED panel that vibrates the entire screen, causing it to produce sound. As I wrote above, the sound is thin and influences the balance of the stereo speakers, but the advantage is that you can put your ear anywhere on the glass and hear the caller on the other end of the phone. I'd rather have a proper front-facing speaker/headpiece, but this isn't a bad solution.
Does the reverse wireless charging work as advertised?
Yep, like Samsung's Wireless PowerShare it needs to be explicitly enabled (and I recommend using a quick tile to do that), but once it's on you can turn the phone over and place a pair of earbuds or a Qi-enabled smartwatch (or another phone, if you're fancy like that), and it charges. Up to 5W maximum, though, so don't expect miracles.
How's the Sorta Sage color?
Glad you asked: it's probably my favorite phone color... maybe ever? I love, love, love it. Green was very in throughout 2020, between Samsung's Mystic Green on the Galaxy Note 20 to Mint Green on the Galaxy S20 FE to the new Aquamarine Green on the OnePlus 8T.
How's the official Fabric Case?
Like all Pixel cases in recent years, it's not the best Pixel 5 case, but it's pretty nice. It comes in a range of colors, and Google's really nailed the fit and finish; this thing fits like a glove without adding too much bulk. My primary concern is that fabric can pick up stains and smells pretty easily, so you'll want to be vigilant about cleaning it with soapy water when it touches something it's not supposed to.
Google Pixel 5: Competition
There's no question that the Pixel 5 debuted in a very crowded marketplace, likely during the worst time of year to release a phone. Apple released four new iPhones within a few weeks of the Pixel 5, including the iPhone 12 mini that started at the same $699 price. And Samsung had just released the superlative Galaxy S20 FE, while the OnePlus 8T offered a lot of value for just $50 more, at $749.
Since its release, the competition has only grown, with perhaps the most direct contender being Samsung's similarly compact Galaxy S21, which launched at $799 but can often be found for the same $699 on sale. Of course, there's also the OnePlus 9 in roughly the same price range if you're fine with a plastic build — it's an excellent phone in its own right with a 120Hz display and surprisingly solid cameras.
And then there's Google's own Pixel 5a — provided you're in the U.S. or Japan — which offers the core experience of the Pixel 5 for less.
In previous years, we were forced to pit the Pixels against the best phones from Samsung, Apple, Huawei, and others, and the consensus tended to split along specification fault lines: if you value power, go for another brand; if you value finesse, get a Pixel. The Pixel 5 fails to advance things on a technology front at all — in fact, it's mostly a regression — so it's leaning far more on finesse than ever. But even that story is slightly undermined by the excellent Pixel 4a and Pixel 4a 5G, phones that cost $350 and $200 less than the Pixel 5, respectively.
At $699, it was pretty difficult to make the case for the Pixel 5, even after we've gushed about it for damn near 6,000 words. In late 2021, with refurbished prices around $500, it's an easier sell. It's just a shame this model is now so difficult to find, and likely to be phased out post-Pixel 6.
Google Pixel 5: Should you buy it?
Who is the Pixel 5 for?
Someone who loves smartphone photography. The Pixel is truly a camera first, and despite not making huge leaps over previous Pixels, this is still the best photography experience on Android.
Someone who just wants to keep things simple. The Pixel experience is unrivaled, and there's just something about using one that feels fluid and natural.
Someone who values security. Pixel phones are the first to receive new platform updates and security patches, and the Pixel 5 will receive three years of each.
Who isn't the Pixel 5 for?
Someone who wants the latest and greatest specs. The Pixel 5 is just in a different category than previous Pixels and isn't trying to compete with the latest iPhone Pros and Galaxy S models of the world. This is a mid-range phone with a price to match.
4.5 out of 5
After the Pixel 6 arrives, the Pixel 5 may no longer be the best Pixel ever. But it is still a really solid little phone. It fixes a number of the issues raised in the flawed-but-ambitious Pixel 4 line while introducing genuinely new, useful camera features, though many of them quickly trickled down to older Pixels. It may have minor downgrades over the Pixel 4, especially in the processing speed and biometrics department, but the battery improvements alone make up for it.
If you're in the market to upgrade your phone this year and don't want to get into the stinging nettles of $1000+ smartphones, you could do a lot worse than the Pixel 5. But it's no longer a clear winner in any category — not for price, not for software, not for performance, and not even for cameras. Instead, it rests near the top of all of them, amalgamating into an experience that I prefer over basically every other Android phone. The difference this year is that there are so many good alternatives at practically every other price point — two of which are made by Google itself.
But from my perspective, having a lineup from the $349 Pixel 4a through the $449 Pixel 5a to the likely $800+ of the Pixel 6 means that you can get a Google phone with incredible cameras and very good batteries, along with all of those software benefits and regular updates, without spending a lot of money.
If you happen to choose the Pixel 5, you're still getting a great little phone.
Google Pixel 5
Google didn't shoot for the moon, but it landed among the stars anyway. The Pixel 5 is one of the best and most accessible phones of 2020, offering most people everything they want and nothing they don't.
Review Changelog, October 2021
This article was originally published in October 2020. It was updated in October 2021 with the following changes:
- Updated pricing and availability (or lack thereof).
- Mentioned the upcoming Pixel 6 launch and the recently-launched Pixel 5a.
- Added Android 12 impressions.
It was updated in May 2021 with the following changes:
- Added mention of newer devices including the Galaxy S21 Ultra, OnePlus 9 Pro, and others.
- Updated with pricing changes (or lack thereof).
- Added changelog.
Alex is global Executive Editor for Android Central, and is usually found in the UK. He has been blogging since before it was called that, and currently most of his time is spent leading video for AC, which involves pointing a camera at phones and speaking words at a microphone. He would just love to hear your thoughts at email@example.com, or on the social things at @alexdobie.
AT&T has mmWave 5G (which is supported on the Pixel 5) in addition to their sub6 5G as well, I don't get why everyone ignores this fact and acts like the inclusion of mmWave 5G capability in the Pixel 5 is only for Verizon - it's not, and was definitely the right move for the US model for both now and future proofing. If $100 to support the 2 best US carriers' latest networks is a problem for you, don't buy the top of the line 5 and get one of the 4as.
Good point. Plus Google has a lot of $$$ invested with Verizon where we'll utilize their 5G network a lot of the time. I'm ok with that.
By the time a majority of the people will have access to mmWave we will be long past the Pixel 5. I think even if every carrier had mmWave it wouldn't be worth it for the few people who can use it. You basically need to be outside and able to look at one of the antennas for it to be useful and none of the carriers have mmWave coverage in more than a handful of the largest cities. mmWave coverage just ins't good technology for mobile devices. It really should be for fixed wireless internet.
The under display speaker appears to be a huge disappointment, sounds tinney without enough sound. The 4a & 4a 5g don't have this problem? I'm keeping my 4xl, to me this is not an upgrade? Besides the 765 doesn't compare to the 855processer!
lol, you can't just say it's not an upgrade. For sure, the sound is a downgrade, but that is 1 of like 80 parts of a smartphone. The ram is an upgrade so you can multitask better. That's much more important to me than the speakers especially since I listen to sound from my smartphone through my bluetooth earbuds 95% of the time and only use my phone speakers 5% of the time. I think that's normal. Most people don't just blast their phone speakers unless they are alone. There is 5G. That is an upgrade for millions of people. Not an upgrade for others. There is a bigger screen in the same physical body. That's an upgrade. There is a wide angle lens that the pixel 4 doesn't have. That's an upgrade. Removing the telephoto could be considered a downgrade except the reason pixel photos are amazing is not because of the 4 year old hardware it uses but the software magic it uses. So you will still get fine/good zoom shots on the pixel 5. The storage is doubled, so that's an upgrade. The battery life is going to be at least 50% better, HUGE upgrade. ETC Look at the phone as a whole. The pixel 5 is not a downgrade from the 4 AS A WHOLE. If you only care about speakers you shouldn't be using a pixel anyways. There are at least a dozen phones out there with better stereo sound. Anyways, just got triggered ;) Pixel 5 is not a huge disappointment unless you get fixated on 1 aspect or the other. Plenty of us will buy it and continue to produce the best photos of any other phone by far, especially with fast moving objects like kids and pets. Pixel 4 is a great phone too. I have it now. Enjoy yours!
Valid points, and a very reasonable argument. But, what if you have a flagship that's a couple years old? Just for fun, how about something that everyone universally hates because Android Central told them to, like the old U12 Plus?
Even AC said the camera matched the Pixel, and DxOMark named it as the best dual camera system in the world at the time. And although that should be taken with a grain of salt, the U12 holds up nicely when used for professional photography, and that was before the camera updates improved things further. For performance, the U12+ also spent significant time as the fastest phone in the world, finally giving in to the the OnePlus 6T, but remaining faster than every Samsung. The Pixel 3, despite the same SoC and "pure" Android, failed to surpass HTC in real world speed tests. What about the Pixel 5? Right now?
2020 Pixel 5: 599 single core, 1635 multi-core (highest score I could find)
2018 HTC U12+: 514 single core, 2140 multi-core (personal device loaded with 170 apps) Now, the screen is better on the Pixel 5, and though I haven't seen it in person, I'll just assume I can give that to Pixel. Although, it could be said that the lower resolution, hole in the screen, and the missing corners dampen the media experience. 90Hz is perceived as an advantage, but let's get real: When people are handed a 60Hz and a 90Hz phone, and even TOLD one is 60Hz and the other is 90Hz, they can't tell which is which. Google also gives up ground on security. Both devices have fast capacitive FP readers in the same location, so that's a tie. Face unlock is gone from the Pixel 5, giving HTC's genuine 3D face unlock the win. I had a good laugh yesterday when the film crew I was working with kept pulling down their face masks to unlock their iPhones, and it just validates that having secure face unlock AND a fingerprint reader are the best of both worlds. Sound? No contest. The U12+ has Boomsound speakers, USonic sonar scanning ANC earbuds, and even the DAC in the 3.5mm adapter can drive high impedance headphones with better dynamic range than LG.
Prefer wireless? HTC has a history of more reliable Bluetooth than the Pixel. By the way, speakers are not just for blasting. I use headphones when other people are around that I might disturb, but if I'm alone or with a friend or two who don't mind, I just whip out the phone and hit play. On many other phones, headphones are a necessity because you can't hear clearly unless you do turn them way up. Storage wise, you can get the U12 in 64 or 128 GB versions, with storage expansion up to 2TB. Mine is at 320GB right now. 6GB of RAM is less than 8 of course, but the Pixel has not been the best at RAM management, so it may be a tie. As far as bezels are concerned, I really like how the Pixel 5 looks with the precisely matching bezel all the way around. It looks really nice, but only gives a few percent more screen to body ratio than the U12. Anyways, in short it seems the Pixel 5's only advantages over a two year old hated flagship are screen brightness and updates, and I thought that was interesting.
I thoroughly enjoyed this review, and not just because I'm a Pixel user. I'm just about due to upgrade mine and my wife's Pixel 3XL's, and while the 5 may not be a HUGE upgrade, it ticks all the boxes I'm looking for, especially since our 3XL's still run great, minus the battery life at this point. Plus, I think double the RAM will solve my only complaint about the 3XL. Based on the market it's releasing in, I'm really hoping it will go on sale somewhere for at least $50 to $100 off relatively soon. That would really make it the perfect upgrade for us. Thanks for the review.
I'm rolling with the 3XL, as well. Still love the phone, so I'm not convinced I need to upgrade, especially since there are no real camera improvements in the 5. I'm also accustomed to a bigger phone, and the smaller size of the 5 is another consideration. However, the bigger battery and more RAM is attractive. Like you, I think once it drops $100 it may become irresistible.
3XL here too. The 5 might be more palatable at $100 less, not sure I would call it irresistible at any price.
Great phone, waaaay too expensive. I love the Pixel line up. I'll wait for a discount.
Should have been 550 to 600.00 bucks. Google's pricing?
So, if this is a camera first, let's stop calling it a phone and start calling it a camera. The Pixel 5 Camera. Oh yeah, it just happens to do phone things as well.
Well, I think that would apply to every phone. Excuse me, I mean camera.
This was quite thorough. Please write more articles like this and quit spamming short click bait articles that people clearly spent less than 30 minutes on. This article reminded me of the great work AC used to be known for.
Phones are boring anymore, not much to write about.
Got mine today, love it! Especially in the UK where its not got the mmWave 5G so its cheaper, plus the pre ordering offered a free Bose QC 35 ii, plus 20% discount for loyalty, all in all im paying £216 for the thing spread over 2 years!
"Easy phone to love but hard to recommend" Loved this line! Sums it up perfectly in the face of the competition. Although I would recommend it for anyone switching from Apple to Android. No hassle software experience with all of the high end features.
Phone should be 200 less 700 is way overpriced
Thanks for the thorough review! I'm happy with my decision of replacing my 4xl with this incremental update. Trade-in for my wife's 3xl will be $168 which is showing it's age battery wise and my wife will get the 4xl.
Concise review! Based on all the Cons... the 5 is a $499.00 camera phone!
I totally agree, 6oo.oo max. 550.00 would have been the sweet spot. Fifty dollars more than the 4a 5g?
I still don't know who buys this in large numbers. The people that want the BMW will still pay for the iPhone or Samsung Galaxy. The budget will still choose go with something like latest Moto G series that works fine as a daily smartphone and will save them hundreds. The Pixel 3 series is the only one Google has released that has made sense in terms of features and price. This phone is still in "no mans land".
People that don'y know anything about specs nor care, that's who. People that are only interested in camera, storage, battery and display. And guess what? Believe it or not, that's the overwhelming majority of consumers. All Google have to do is ramp up some interesting marketing campaigns and incentive the carriers to push the 5 on consumers, like Apple and Samsung does.
I don't think anyone does buy these in large numbers.
I mean... The best celery you've ever eaten is still just celery.
I'm tired of people complaining about the price. If you think it should be cheaper... guess what?!? the 4a 5g is cheaper and basically the same internal specs. You get everything the 5 has except for a few niceties. With the 5 you are paying a bit more for some premium features (IP rating, wireless charging, better build) . If that's not worth the extra cost then get the 4a 5g...it's really not that hard. Google is giving you 3 great options at different price points. If you want a Google phone find the one that offers the most value for you and stop complaining. Or buy something else. Ya'll act like someone is forcing you to buy the Pixel 5.
Except that the Samsung FE and OnePlus 8t are offering SD865, UFS3.1 storage, 120hz refresh rates, bigger battery, bigger screen etc.. for the exact same price. I think that's why a lot of people are mentioning price
Except this isn't true. In Canada the breakdown is as follows :
OnePlus 8T is CA$1099 + tax
Samsung FE is CA$949 + tax
Pixel 5 is CA$799 + tax
Sales tax in Ontario is 13%
So these phones are NOT the same price in my market! Pixel 5 is also out of stock on the Canadian Google store.
If you cherry pick specs you can tell whatever story you want. Compared to the devices you mentioned the Pixel 5 has a better software experience, better camera, more RAM, metal build, always on the latest version on Android and security patch, smaller size (lots of people prefer smaller phones), proper fingerprint sensor placement, more efficient processor. All of these phones are in the same general range in features and specs and thus in a similar price category. It just depends what you prefer. But that wasn't the point of my initial comment anyway. My point was that if you want a Google phone (an experience that is unique and unmatched by any competitor) and think the 5 is too expensive, there is the 4a 5g that gives you the exact same experience for much less just without a few of the nice to haves. If you like Samsung phones or if raw specs are all that matters to you the FE is a great value no one is denying that. But I absolutely cannot stand Samsung software, hate in-display fp sensors, prefer smaller phones, and highly value up to date software and security patches. If those things take priority over processing speeds that are overkill and a slight bump in refresh rate then you will choose a Google phone. I would have loved to see Google also produce a high-end phone and that's that one I would choose but for the price the 5 and 4a5g are no doubt great values. I'll stick with my Pixel 3 for now but if I needed a phone this year I would be happy with the offerings from Google and the value proposition.
I just wish they would have released the XL version of this. The regular Pixel size is too small for me. Instead of waiting for the release of the XL, now I am looking to get another phone completely.
Isn't the 4a XL 5G (or whatever it is called) basically the same thing as an XL 5? Is the only difference wireless charging?
"Best" of all the Pixels is not saying much.
I'm a pixel fan 👦 boy, but 7oo.oo is too much for the 765 mid-range processer. Besides, 4mos ago I got the 4xl for 599.00, a much better deal. The 4a at 349.00 is the real deal that gets the basics very ✅ right. Sure, it's missing a few things but for the 💰 🤑 a better deal?
Its really hard to compare price-wise because of inflation. Prices of everything is going up.
Google's only advantage is quick OS updates. Other than this, there is no reason for me to buy a Google phone. They are buggy and have poor QC. Google's smartphone business is just an after thought. I bought a Galaxy S20 FE and couldn't be happier.
Buggy? Now I agree about the only advantage Google has is the update but a Google smartphone OS being buggy?..... Naw. I've never had a buggy Google phone. Pixel or Nexus.
Got mine and liking it so far, smaller than I thought it'd be. As tall as my galaxy S7 but a touch narrower. It's light too, despite the bigger battery. It will suit me fine for my personal needs.
5 hours SOT is "fantastic" battery life? Have you used other phones? It's surely adequate for most users and definitely an upgrade from prior Pixels I imagine but I'm actually surprised given the 765G with its touted efficiency and just a 90Hz display. I hear the adaptive battery may lead to increases as the phone gets to learn your routine but I wouldn't objectively call phones with 5 hour SOT as fantastic in 2020
It's only fantastic compared to the Pixel 4, lol. A couple years ago, Android Central reviewed a phone and complained about battery life, which was 5.5 hours from a smaller battery, higher resolution screen, and a faster processor. Go figure 🙄
Guys this phone is so utterly average in every way. Just very disappointing. I was always hoping that Google would finally nail it but they really just don't know what they're doing. I'm really glad I got the OnePlus 8 Pro. With GCam app it's basically perfect. I think it's time for Google to either get out the game or like fire their whole design team.
The only thing that matters is, will it sell? The answer is probably, yes it will. The vast majority of consumers aren't spec warriors and don't go into a store asking about chip set, GPU and RAM. They just want to see how the display looks, how long will the battery last, how much storage is available and how well it takes pictures. Without a doubt the Pixel 5 is on the positive side of all 4 of those categories. The average consumer don't care about refresh rate, pixel density, the micro second difference in chip speed from a Pixel 5 to the S20fe. Most aren't hardcore gamers. Long as it can handle Angry Birds, Marble games and video chat, they are good. With that said, I do agree that Google has fumbled the ball in nearly everything they have their hands in since Sundar has taken over and I personally feel that the big boys need to come back and take over to right the ship. Google is constantly starting, stopping, switching, destroying apps, shutting down services and a bad habit of not perfecting apps and just releasing them half baked. Its literally getting to the point of being sickening. The Google leadership is the epitome of too smart for their own friggin good. They come out with great apps and services but can't polish them if their lives depended on it. It's just frustrating. They have great service ie Drive, Keep, GMail, calendar, but can't make the ecosystem tie in seamlessly. Case in point, It was a great convenience to be able to send my kids money right through the Messages app. Now they killed that and know when my kids text me for money, I have move out of Messages, go into the app drawer and open Google Pay to do the same thing I used to do right from the text app by simply hitting the PLUS icon. Really stupid idea by the Google's leadership and I fear there is more to come. I ready to sstart looking for alternatives to Google's services.
Google could have sold the phone for 600 and people would complain it is over priced....I am selling my S20 and happy to be going back to the Pixel. Looking forward to next year and see how they improve on this awesome rendetion.
At the high price range of an average phone... That sounds a lot like socialism.... Yawn, tiny photo differences on old camera spec technology. Socialism, or the Pixel, is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
Great stuff guys!
"if there were two versions, one with sub-6 5G at $699 and a Verizon-specific model at $699," Is that what you meant to say? Wouldn't the not Verizon, not mmWave, be cheaper?
The note 20 beats the pixel 5 hands down. Samsung is now the smartphone leader they have the best devices.
That is your opinion, not a fact. Deal with people liking the Pixel experience.
I needed a change and went iPhone 12 this year. Nothing wowed me Android wise. Time to see how the other half live. I'm sure I'll be back, eventually.
I agree, I'm still using my 3 XL but it is getting a little old. I want to use the best phone I can afford and this year that looks like an iPhone 12, sadly. I can't begin to express how disappointed I am with the Pixel 4 and Pixel 5.
Already have an iPhone again as I'm fed up with Android and it's flaws as I e had a lot of security issues and, I got last year's 11 Pro Max (2 months before the 12 came out) and I love it, well had as it was stolen but thankfully it's insured so I'll be getting a replacement. I won't be coming back to Android as my daily driver again. I'm loving iOS (as I'm reminded why I've always preferred iPhone over Android) and will be moving all in the Apple ecosystem. With that said thaf said, the Pixel 5 is actually a decent phone but it took 5 generations of Pixel for Google to get it right but it's still overpriced for what you get though.
$100 overpriced due to the Verizon tax and Zero promo's (like$200+ Bose headphones 🎧) here in the US paired with bad speakers 🔇 make this phone a No-Go. I've owned every generation of Pixel, until now, and I'll check out the Pixel 6's, if there even are any. Late breaking news: We now have Pixel 5's with the screens separating from the bodies upon removal from the box. There's that vaunted Google QA, as hard at work as always, Lol.
Got my Pixel 5 last week. It's fast, clear screen and the battery life is excellent. It is well designed and a good size that sits easily in the hand. It is a good price in the UK. It will get updates first. I've never had problems with bugs on a Pixel phone that aren't sorted quickly. I'm very happy with it.
Brand new and they are already coming apart at the seams.
At 7oo.oo bucks, this phone is not for the average consumer. The 4a takes that crown especially at 349.00? Seven hundred ain't chump change for a phone that should have cost 550.00 max. It's definitely overpriced at 7oo.oo?
Q: Where can I get hold of that autumnal wallpaper used in a few images and the video thumbnail?
I paid $450 for the Pixel 4 on Prime day. I think I got a hell of a lot more value and phone than the Pixel 5 at $700. Sure, battery life may not be as good but I have a wireless charger at work that my phone sits on so I have never even seen it go below 80%. If the Pixel 5 was $550 I could see the argument but for $700 several of the past Pixel phones have been better even at launch prices.
Nice write up. The Pixel 5 is a nice but kinda forgettable phone. Once the Holiday season passes I would not be surprised if you can get one closer to $550. I can wait.
I think any time you guys do "comparisons" to other phones, you should take a picture of the phones sitting next to one another. I think I'll be buying Pixel phones until the end of time because they aren't insanely huge. I just can't fathom carrying a Galaxy S20 sized phone in my pocket all the time. I've had a Pixel 3 for the last two years and was very glad to see the overall physically size of the P5 didn't go up at all, even though the screen did. Here's hoping they keep making 'normal' sized phones for the forseeable future.
How is the quality of the sound recording on videos recorded by the pixel 5?
FOUR AND A HALF????
With a dim display, poor speakers, weak processor and missing telephoto lens? I think not!
Love this phone, but I wish it were an XL.
P5 does everything well, and has almost the same size screen as my P2XL. I don't understand the "dim display" issue, this display is excellent. It was the same when the P2 came out, there was supposed to be a blue tint to the screen, but I never noticed it. If the battery on my P2XL hadn't died, I'd still be using it. The P5 display is the same height as the P2XL, but not as wide. I had no issues with the size of the P2XL, it fit into every pocket that I wanted it to. I would have loved to see a P2XL-sized P5, with edge-to-edge display. Maybe the P6?
Best of the worst phones ever.
I don’t think I could disagree more. Screen is too small. The 765 is not a flagship processor and it shows. I was getting lag and stutters where I get none on my Pixel 4 XL with an 855. Then there’s the price. You’re paying more for less. I returned mine and bought a Pixel 4 XL new for just over $400. It’s a much better phone for half the price. About the only thing I wish it had is the fingerprint sensor.
Funnily enough I thought it was the worst Pixel ever made. Considering it was only $100 less than the Pixel 4, they cut so many corners and did nothing to improve on the Pixel 4 except for battery life. It's absurdly overpriced for regards it is, with similarly priced phones having flagship processors and more complete camera systems. If that's the direction Google is going to go with then good luck to them. Can't see the Pixels being any more than a niche product.
I'll wait for the Pixel 6 to see how Google SoC works in the Pixel 6 but if it's the same size as the Pixel 5 then forget about it. 6.2" is the sweet spot for the Pixel phones. The 4a5g is the right size in my opinion.
IPixels are overrated and overpriced along with them no longer having great cameras anymore with the iPixel 5 finishing last behind my S20 FE and iPhone 12.
The Pixel 5 has only improved since launch. I got one shortly after launch and returned it a few days later. I just recently went for it again and now I love it. The only thing I would change is the screen size. I think 6.2" is the sweet spot for me.
The Pixel 5 has grown on me and I've got a confession to make, I've always loved the Pixel software and still do and may get a Pixel as my next phone as it meets all my needs and I'm really a point and shoot person and value simplicity with customisation and I think that Google's philosophy in regards to the Pixels suits me better.
Absolutely love my Pixel 5. Snagged one off eBay in the Sage color. Was pleasantly surprised that the speaker was not as bad.
A great review. Not just because I agree with it on nearly all points. But very well written with real world applicability. Keep on keepin' on.
So we're ignoring the display gap issue now?
Also 128gb is a bit mean these days if you're holding on to a phone for 3+ years.
The Pixel 5 is OK, but doesn't have a compelling reason to buy it for me.
Get the best of Android Central in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to Android Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.