Why Samsung only cares about 'Android' and 'Google' when it's convenient
A question we hear every year is: why doesn't Samsung ever participate in Google's Android beta program while other companies like Xiaomi, which also has its own heavily reworked version of Android, do it?
The obvious answer is that it just takes Samsung longer to build its own experiences atop the Android base. But there's also another reason: Samsung likes to hype itself instead of Google. That's not a bad thing considering how much work it takes to do what Samsung does, but it makes the relationship between the two companies seem strained at times.
At most Samsung events you'll barely hear the words 'Android' or 'Google'. Other times Samsung is quick to tell us how it worked with Google, or Microsoft, or Adobe, or whoever, to do something spectacular. This isn't an oversight or an accident; it's Samsung knowing how to play the right cards.
When we finally got to officially see the Galaxy Z Fold 2 Samsung told us just how closely it worked with Google to do the software magic of continuity between displays based on different hinge angles. That was to make sure we knew that this wasn't some sort of hack that a smart engineer at Samsung figured out — it helped make this "morphing" of apps part of Android. Samsung also told us how it then worked with Microsoft to make sure Office apps worked 100% the way it wanted them to work.
That gives the impression that Samsung was a key player in making all of this work and that it made sure everything was "Google-approved" so it didn't have to change something in the future. And that's 100% true, so it's the impression we should have after seeing and hearing it.
But in that same event, like so many others, there was little or no reference to the Fold 2 being an Android phone; instead, it's a Galaxy phone. Samsung rightfully, in my opinion, makes a distinction between the two.
When Samsung releases a new phone or when it updates the operating system, everything about it is "Galaxy" because they are unique. Only Samsung makes Galaxy phones and the software running on them, even though plenty of others try and emulate it. All one has to do is compare a Pixel phone or a phone running Android One to a Galaxy S20 and you can they aren't very similar.
Samsung does what it needs to do so everything built for Android, like apps, accessories, and interoperability with other products is good to go. Once that's done, Samsung builds an operating system around it. And things might have been rough in the beginning, but now Samsung does a fantastic job and I'm sure Google loves the company being its partner.
We probably won't see any Samsung phones that can enroll in Google's Android beta program, but we do see One UI beta programs with just as much fanfare surrounding it. Part of the reason is that Samsung does need more time to make things right, but part of it is also that Samsung wants to make its own thunder, not have Google steal it away. And does it really make any difference? Either way, you can have fun being a
guinea pig Q&A tester and play with new software.
In any case, it's working. There is a reason that Samsung is the top phone maker in the world and no, it's not just marketing. The company has done just what Google intended with Android: used it as a base on which to build great software. Everyone has preferences and maybe One UI and Galaxy phones aren't for you. But for millions and millions of others, things are great.
You do you, Samsung. You're doing just fine.
A massively refined take
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 improves on a number of the original Fold's design traits and includes modern specs and 5G support. Its hefty price won't appeal to most buyers, but it could be worth the money to foldable enthusiasts and multitaskers.
Get the Android Central Newsletter
Instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Jerry is an amateur woodworker and struggling shade tree mechanic. There's nothing he can't take apart, but many things he can't reassemble. You'll find him writing and speaking his loud opinion on Android Central and occasionally on Twitter.
Samsung has come a long way. OneUI works well for me, for others I can see why it wouldn't I generally used Nexus and then Pixel phones until the Galaxy S8. From then on I've really appreciated the hardware and UI experience. For playing with Android betas, having a Pixel device as a backup phone works great.
I'm good with it, probably will get another when my S10e kicks the bucket.
In my opinion, Stock Android is a bit bland and sparse. I know some people will sing praises to Stock Android in the name of some vaguely-defined "purity" (yes vaguely-defined, I mean, is Google Camera a "pure" Android thing or an OEM addition for the Google Pixel line?), but I personally cannot see how this "purity" benefits me, the end-user. Google wants Android to be a launcher for their Google Apps but that's not what most people want an OS to be, instead they want an environment offering lots of relevant information and content right on the desktop. Hence, a major point of differentiation in OEMs is their ability to take Stock Android and add the requisite bells and whistles to it. In this regard, Samsung are not following any different strategy from any other OEM, they are just the best at the game (though I am partial to HTC's UI, call me old fashioned).
Good points man. Agreed. I've always found stock android sparse and uninviting.
So Samsung is its own business... And abides by the agreement with Google for Android... And pays Google for Android... So they should bend over backwards for Google too?
No...and he's not implying they should.
Very interesting article, thank you. "...worked with Google, or Microsoft, or Adobe, or whoever..." Hum, I believe it should read whomever. If I am incorrect I will take my lumps.