Skip to main content

Moto E4 Plus vs. Moto G5 Plus: Battery vs. everything else

You'd be forgiven for not fully understanding Motorola's release strategy in the U.S., since it not only differs to many other parts of the world, but the carriers play a role here that they often don't in other markets.

That brings us to the Moto E4 Plus, which recently launched at carriers like Verizon, Sprint and Ting, and unlocked through various retailers like Amazon, Best Buy and others.

At first glance, the Moto E4 Plus wouldn't seem to give the more-expensive Moto G5 Plus a run for its money, but that's what's so interesting about this phone: it does. They look alike and even share the same metal-and-plastic materials (though the G5 uses more metal overall), but where the 'G' stands for "grown up" the 'E' stands for "everlasting" (OK, that's not a great equivocation, but you get the idea).

So which should you buy? And why? Let's take a look.

First, the specs

CategoryMoto E4 PlusMoto G5 Plus
Operating SystemAndroid 7.1 NougatAndroid 7.0 Nougat
Display5.5-inch LCD 1280x720 (267 ppi)5.2-inch LCD 1920x1080 (424 ppi)
Gorilla Glass 3
ProcessorSnapdragon 427 1.4GHz quad-core, Adreno 308 GPUSnapdragon 625 2GHz octa-core
Adreno 506 GPU
ExpandablemicroSD card up to 128GBmicroSD card up to 128GB
Rear Camera13MP
5-piece lens
12MP, f/1.7
1.4-micron pixels, dual AF pixels
Front Camera5MP
selfie flash
5MP, f/2.2, 1.4-micron pixels
ConnectivityWi-Fi 802.11n dual-band
Bluetooth 4.1
Wi-Fi 802.11n dual-band
Bluetooth 4.2
10W rapid charger
15W TurboPower charger
Water resistanceWater-repellant nano-coatingWater-repellant nano-coating
SecurityFingerprint sensorFingerprint sensor
Dimensions155 x 77.5 x 9.55 mm150.2 x 74 x 9.7 mm
Weight181 g155 g
ColorsIron Gray, Fine GoldLunar Gray, Fine Gold
Price$179.99 (2GB/16GB) / $199.99 (2GB/32GB)$229.99 (2GB/32GB) / $299.99 (4GB/64GB)

Hardware and design

OK, so the main takeaway from the spec sheet is that the Moto E4 Plus is taller and heavier, with a larger, lower-resolution screen and a much larger battery. There's something to be said for the compromise: Motorola already has a Moto E4, which at 5 inches is much more pocketable and, starting at little as $129.99, much more affordable. Instead, the Moto E4 Plus goes all-in on longevity, outfitting its meager specs with a massive 5000mAh cell that should last two days or longer. We've seen other companies attempt this strategy, but the "budget-specs-big-battery" maneuver hasn't yet taken off in the States like it has in parts of Asia.

Internally, the Moto E4 Plus doesn't quite compete with the G5 Plus: its Snapdragon 427 chip is a quad-core part built on an aging, relatively inefficient 28nm process; the G5 Plus's Snapdragon 625 is a proven performer, both in terms of speed, reliability and battery life. Of course, the G5 Plus's 3000mAh battery is some 40% smaller than the E4 Plus's, but our battery results prove that average use isn't a world apart between them.

Design-wise, these two are basically the same phone — which is just fine, because they look more expensive than they are.

Two other important differences need to be highlighted: the Moto G5 Plus's 1080p IPS panel is heads and tails better than the E4 Plus's, which is both larger in size, lower in resolution and of demonstrably poorer quality. The IPS panel is much brighter, making it easier to use in direct sunlight, and its touch responsiveness just makes everything a little nicer.

From a design perspective, these phones could not look more similar. They're both solid, made from a combination of metal and plastic, and while the Moto E4 Plus's rear casing comes off, it's just for show — there's no removable battery here. With nondescript fronts, a speaker/earpiece combination above the screen and a very capable rounded fingerprint sensor below, the Moto G5 Plus looks like Mini Me next to the E4 Plus. Around back, they share rounded sides and a circular camera module, but the Moto E4's smaller sensor is flush with the body whereas the G5's sticks out a little.

You'd be forgiven for thinking, judging from its extra weight, that the Moto E4 Plus was thicker than its G5 counterpart, but it's not: there's 1.5mm between them, with the E4 using its extra vertical space to accommodate the much larger battery. Neither are thin phones, at between 9.55 and 9.7mm, but the E4 Plus's 181 grams is hefty; I feel it weighing me down when left idle in my pocket.

Here's one potential hardware issue for headphone sticklers: the 3.5mm jack is on the top of the Moto E4 Plus, which I dislike very much. I prefer to be able to put a phone in my pocket face down so that when I remove it, cord and all, I don't have to fumble with the phone to get it into the right orientation. But hey, at least both phones have headphone jacks. Et tu, Moto Z2 Force?

Finally, both phones charge via Micro-USB, which sucks. Motorola continues to justify this by saying that legacy customers want to continue being able to use their existing cables, but come on, Motorola. Every company from Huawei to ZTE to TCL has moved its budget line over the new USB-C charging solution, and the short-term pain is worth the long-term gain.


Identical. Well, almost.

To the untrained eye, all Motorola software looks the same, from the $70 Moto E4 to the $720 Moto Z2 Force. But there are details, important ones, that need to be clarified.

From a software perspective, the Moto G5 Plus can do pretty much everything a flagship Motorola device can, from twisting one's wrist to open the camera app to flipping the phone onto its front to silence a call. It doesn't have the always-listening voice commands that the Z line benefits from, but the core features are here, including the excellent, improved Moto Display. But it runs Android 7.0, which keeps it from the subtle improvements found in Motorola's version of Android 7.1.1 that ships on the Moto E4 Plus, namely adjusting the color temperature of the screen at night to improve sleep quality.

The Moto E4 Plus, even though it ships with Android 7.1.1, doesn't have the same sensors as the more-expensive G5 Plus, so that twist-to-open gesture — yeah, that's not here. Neither is the flip-to-silence, chop-chop-to-flashlight, or any number of interesting gestures that come standard on the higher-end models.

Both units have Motorola's nascent One Button Nav feature, which eschews on-screen buttons for home button gestures. I've already made my feelings about the reliability of the space-saving solution in other reviews, but I'll reiterate it here: it's not great. It's far too easy to go home, accessed by tapping the home button, when you meant to go back, accessed by swiping left on the same button. The margin of error is too great, and the results too frustrating, for me to use One Button Nav for more than a few minutes, but I'm only one person — I've heard from people that love it. If that's the case, it's here for you to love.


There is no question that one of the Moto G5 Plus's redeeming features is its excellent 12MP camera. While it's not perfect, it's pretty much unbeatable for the price. The excellent, high-quality Sony sensor with accurate colors; the sharp f/1.7 lens with real bokeh; the simple-but-usable Pro mode — there isn't much to complain about here. Sure, low-light performance isn't comparable to phones twice or three times its price, but for $230, you're getting an unassailable weapon in the fight against bad smartphone photos. And, though you probably don't want to, it can shoot 4K video at 30fps.

Moto G5 Plus (left) | Moto E4 Plus (right)

The Moto E4 Plus, on the other hand, has a very mediocre, blah camera. Photos look like they're digitally processed; colors look flat and boring; and low-light quality is practically non-existent. You're getting what you pay for here. Sure, there are technically more megapixels in the E4 Plus's sensor, but that doesn't mean much when the details captured are so vague.

Where the Moto E4 Plus shines — literally — is the front-facing camera. It has a flash to illuminate even the most ashen of faces. Both phones have 5MP front shooters, but selfie lovers may want to go with the cheaper option.

Battery life

This one isn't really a contest, but we'll play along. The Moto G5 Plus has a 3000mAh battery, a 1080p display, and a very efficient octa-core chip; the Moto E4 Plus has a 5000mAh battery, a 720p display and a less efficient quad-core chip. The latter trounces the former by almost half a day, but that shouldn't surprise you.

While I was able to get just over a day of use from the G5 Plus, I used the E4 Plus as a daily driver for just over a week and never dipped below 40% by the end of the night, and more common was above 50% left in the tank.

If battery life is your chief concern — and these days that includes most people — the Moto E4, warts and all, is likely your best bet. It's just a phenomenal workhorse of a budget phone, and one that I would recommend to anyone looking for a no-frills handset.


The two phones can each connect to mobile networks at a theoretical speed of 300Mbps down and 150Mbps up, and both are theoretically compatible with Sprint and Verizon in the U.S., as well as the easier-to-assume AT&T and T-Mobile. Some early buyers of the Moto E4 Plus have noted, however, that it's not possible to activate the phone on Sprint (opens in new tab) just yet, though that issue should hopefully get resolved soon.

Bringing it home, only the Moto G5 Plus supports dual-band Wi-Fi (2.4GHz and 5GHz), which is a big advantage for anyone who doesn't have a big data bucket and plans to offload a lot of wireless traffic to home Wi-Fi. And while neither phone supports NFC in the U.S., the Moto G5 Plus has the slightest advantage with Bluetooth 4.2 over the E4's Bluetooth 4.1, though real-world differences should be minor.

Which should you buy? Moto G5 Plus

Look, at the end of the day, the Moto G5 Plus is a much better phone than the E4 Plus, especially when both are as closely matched, spec-wise, as possible. On Amazon, the Moto 2GB RAM/32GB storage Moto E4 Plus costs $199.99; the equivalent Moto G5 Plus is $229.99, and you get a lot for that extra few bucks, including a faster processor, improved screen, and vastly better camera.

See Moto G5 Plus at Amazon (opens in new tab)

On the other hand, the Moto E4 Plus is a battery champion, and if you don't need 32GB of storage, it begins at $179.99 — or $159.99 if you don't mind Amazon's lock screen ads. I'd still argue that the Moto G5 Plus is a better decision since it's a more well-rounded phone, but you can't beat the E4 Plus for longevity.

See Moto E4 Plus at Amazon (opens in new tab)

What do you think? Which phone would you buy between these two? Let us know in the comments below!

Daniel Bader was a former Android Central Editor-in-Chief and Executive Editor for iMore and Windows Central. 

  • I want that 5000 mAh battery in other phones!!!
    If Moto can stuff that big of battery in a $200 phone they can do it in higher end ones.
  • Yeah, it's weird.... I almost get the feeling that Motorola wants people want to buy their midrange/budget options. I can get almost everything I want in budget phones these days (except the camera) and it performs admirably. Not seeing any point in buying a phone that's over $600.
  • Specs on the G5 camera are similar to the first Gen Z force and other flagship phones of 2016, phone really has everything most people need.
  • Specs match, but the software processing isn't on par.
  • They wouldn't put a 5000 mAh battery in their high end then they wouldn't sell battery mods
  • Is this stupid or what. They put a 5000mamp battery in the E4plus then put a 2730mamp battery in their premier flagship. What kind of baloney is that. Lenovo sucks, with out a doubt!
  • It's amazing how blind Lenovo is these days. They simply cannot compete against the Samsung/Apple monolith at the high end (moto Z?, never) but they could easily dominate the mid-range market, at least in the USA. All they need to do is simplify their model line and end up with something like a G5 Plus with an excellent camera, add NFC and add a bigger battery for 2-day battery life and also have a bigger screen version option for those that like'em big. It's so simple and obvious yet they just can't get it done.
  • In other words Bleex, you want the Lenovo P2?
  • FWIW I get 2 days out of my G5+ and I'm streaming media (Audio Books, YouTube Red) all night at work It's a great phone
  • The Moto G5+ is amazing. The camera is a downgrade from my Galaxy S7 (obviously) but otherwise love everything else from the smooth performance to the much better battery life. Oh, and unlike Daniel I actually like the One Nav Button, so much more cohesive.
  • I've had the g5+ for a couple of weeks now having moved from a not so good ( after dropping) dtek60 and I can safely say that you don't need any whistle and bells to have a good / great phone. My daughter has the standard g5 and that's good to. My only little issue is the screen colour is a pale but I understand the difference in screen between the g5+ and my old dtek.
  • I have the G5 Plus and I do like it for many reasons. BUT after a couple months I finally discovered that it's not set up for VoLTE (on Verizon) and that's a real game changer. Is there anything I can do besides get a different phone?
  • On The Motorola support site they are rolling out an update to fix the Verizon VoLTE issue people have been complaining about. So VoLTE should work already or very soon on Verizon with your G5 plus.
  • I guess that doesn't really tell you which phone I'd buy, but if I had known about the no VoLTE thing I wouldn't buy the G5 Plus
  • It's sad they put bigger batteries in low to midrange phones than they do their flagship phones. They used to be kings of battery life.
  • Screw lenovo, E4plus5000map battery,z2force2730mamp battery! What's wrong with this picture. Your premier flagship, a shelf item!
  • So why in the H cant they put the 5000mah battery IN BOTH!!??? This is why I hate the cell phone industry. I'm always forced to spend my $$$ on crap designs I dont want.
  • Like mentioned in the comments above I love the G5 Plus (so much more than the LG G5 lol) other than the VoLTE problem with Verizon. It's making me want to switch over to an AT&T MVNO to see if they have gotten better. It's been about 2 years since I had their network before so maybe it has improved some in my area.
  • I am using Moto E4 Plus...(Indian)...😎
    Processer: Media Tek 6737...
    Storage: 32GB...
    RAM: 3 GB...
  • I been using the vibe P1 and the battery is so freaking amazing. Xiaomi too have great phones with huge batteries without compromising resolution. 5.5 screen at 720p not for me. I'm a Moto guy but I'm gonna pass on the e plus because too big screen and low resolution.
  • Having great battery life is truly liberating in a phone. I hammer my Lenovo P2 (SD625 4/32gb and a 5100mAh battery) and usually have at least 50% left at the end of the day. With the Galaxy S7E I would get through 1 full charge with another 75% gone with the same usage.
  • It seems from the leaks that the Moto X4 is gonna be Motorola's best phone this year. Best combination of specs with battery life. No mod gimmicks, just a good overall phone. That's my next phone.
  • Word 👌 anticipating the X!!
  • Lenovo is going to much it up by launching an upgraded version named Moto X4S a couple of months later to grab more $$$.
    Don't believe me? Look at the stunt they just pulled with the G line up. No wonder the updates get friggin delayed. It's only going to get worse. I miss the old brand which believed in innovation, support and a minimalistic portifolio
  • "And while neither phone supports NFC in the U.S...." Annnd, there's the dealbreaker. This is absolutely inexcusable in 2017, I don't care how cheap the phone is.
  • I think the title of this article really sums it up; do you want epic battery life or all the other specs. I've been drooling slightly of the massive battery of the E4 Plus as the new home for my work number, tempted by the idea of powering up on Monday and not needing to plug in again until Friday, which is definitely not something I can't do with the Desire 510 that I currently used. However, for a general purpose primary smartphone recommendation, you have to go with the G5
  • I feel it's important to note that the Moto G5+ is no slouch in battery life either. I regularly get 7-8 hours SOT, which to me is excellent. I'm sure the Moto E4+ get well over 10 hours and that's legendary. I guess what I'm getting at is you really can't go wrong with either one in terms of battery life.
  • Does this make sense if they put a 5000mamp in the z2force how many would have sold? Lenovo screwed the pooch with a 2730mamp battery in their best flagship! I actually wanted this phone but now, no thanks!
  • ... And what's the ABSOLUTE LAMEST aspect of this design?... The entry level E4 with the 5000mah battery is THINNER than the G5 with 3000mah battery!!!! All these stupid YT reviewers and media experts need to get off the "thiner is better" bandwagon... its not. If you're not going to make it removable, then at least give Consumers what they want... a bigger battery AND flagship specs!!! (I'm not even going to comment on the Z2 force and its 2730 mah battery!!!... that kind of stupidity just goes without saying)
  • As a G5 Plus owner since May, I can say that this is the best phone all around that I've ever had. It is every bit the performer that my last iPhone (the 6S) was, at least in the areas that I tended to use. I never compared their benchmarks to get more technical with my comparison. This remained true in comparison to my Galaxy S6. I like all three of those phones, but considering what the G5 Plus cost me in comparison to the other 2 (flagships I might add), that pretty much sealed it for me. Of course now I am looking forward to the dual camera and larger, full HD, screen of the forthcoming G5S Plus. If the price point remains somewhat consistent to the other G5 phones, I'm all in on Moto mid-range takeover 2017, lol...
  • What about the Alcatel Idol 5S and Nokia 6? Do they compare well to Moto’s latest budget phones?