The life cycle of the PS5 so far has been mired by delays and unanswered questions, leading many to be wary of Sony's plans for the console. PlayStation attempted to quell some of those fears during its big 2021 showcase in September, but we were left with far too many questions and very little answers. While Insomniac seems to be having quite a productive time working on Spider-Man 2 and a Wolverine game, many of its bigger studios — barring Sony Santa Monica and Guerrilla Games, which are currently developing God of War Ragnarok and Horizon Forbidden West, respectively — are working on unannounced projects.
You could say that this tactic of not announcing games too early has its merits. Studios may feel less pressure to hit a specific date when the game isn't publicly announced or finalized, and there won't be throngs of people arguing about supposed downgrades or unimpressive graphics before it launches. Taking one look at the reaction to leaked Redfall screenshots, you'll see plenty of people discussing how bad the graphics appear, not taking into account that it's an early alpha build not intended for the public. By not announcing games before they're ready, Sony can avoid this backlash to an extent. But that leads to a whole other problem: fans not feeling confident in the company.
This probably wouldn't be an issue if Sony's direct competitor, Microsoft, didn't have so many exclusives in the works. Xbox has The Outer Worlds 2, Avowed, The Elder Scrolls IV, Starfield, Fable, Hellblade 2, Indiana Jones, State of Decay 3, and plenty other AAA titles in development right now, many of which don't have release windows, let alone release dates. Other than Insomniac's upcoming games and two exclusives to be released by March 2022, we don't know what the PS5 has to offer in the future (third-party games notwithstanding). Announcing an entire generation's lineup isn't feasible, but keeping fans in the dark so long doesn't do Sony any favors, either. It doesn't seem to have found the right balance in terms of announcement cadence.
Like Microsoft, Sony has a lot of studios under its belt, but their plans are in the dark. Notably, we have no idea what Naughty Dog is working on. Rumors point towards a remake of The Last of Us for PS5, and the studio's even confirmed it was building up a multiplayer game that became too big to be a part of The Last of Us Part 2. But we've seen nothing to give us a good idea of what Naughty Dog is really up to. And Bend Studio, coming off the 2019 release of Days Gone, has been relatively radio silent focusing on a new IP.
It wouldn't feel reasonable to expect something from Sucker Punch just yet considering the success of Ghost of Tsushima and how recently it first launched, but that studio has to have something up its sleeve. If it were a Microsoft property instead of Sony, I'd wager we would have already heard about what it's working on. Sony keeps its cards much closer to its chest, sometimes at its own detriment.
Sony seems to be relying heavily on third-party partnerships to market the PS5. Lucasfilm Games just announced a Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republics remake, launching as a console exclusive on PS5. There's also Final Fantasy 16 and Forespoken, both coming from Square Enix. But Sony shouldn't rely on third-party deals like this when those games could potentially make their way to Xbox as well. The company already has a respectable amount of first party studios; we just don't know what many of them are up to.
In a time when game delays are frequent and plans change constantly, Sony's strategy here seems understandable. Sony's not the only major company in the market, though, and when it has to go up against Microsoft and prove why the PS5 is a better investment than the Xbox Series X, its roadmap is worrying.
As amazing as Insomniac is — and I have no doubt that Spider-Man 2 and Wolverine will clear a high bar, likely becoming some of the best PS5 games ever made — it's weird to see these games announced so far in advance when others aren't.
And that's not even getting into what Sony may have planned for PS5 VR. We know its controller will feature haptic feedback and adaptive triggers, much like the DualSense, and look more akin to the Oculus Quest 2 controllers. This is a huge step for PlayStation on the VR front, but we've heard very little about it. VR is the one area where PlayStation can (currently) set itself apart from Xbox.
While Sony's PS5 roadmap leaves a lot to be desired, it doesn't spell disaster for the company. Optics aside, PlayStation's been delivering excellent games recently like Returnal and Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart. It's not so much a question of quality here, it's quantity. Sony will want to deliver on both fronts in the coming years.
Whatever PlayStation has in store for fans, it's clear that the company needs to work on its messaging moving forward. Months of radio silence isn't going to cut it. Microsoft has nailed the messaging so far this generation, so PlayStation has some catching up to do.
Jennifer Locke has been playing video games nearly her entire life. You can find her posting pictures of her dog and obsessing over PlayStation and Xbox, Star Wars, and other geeky things.
Thank you for sharing the opinion of a tiny sliver of console gamers. There is no evidence that a majority, plurality, or even a sizeable minority are in anyway worried or concerned about PlayStation this generation.
I think it's more basic than that. SONY is a HARDWARE company. They make their money selling hardware. They support games only so much as they are used to sell the hardware they run on. This has been their business model since the PS1 days. Unfortunately for SONY, the world is moving to a "Streaming" model, just like the music business did (killing CDs and the "Walkman" products along the way.) SONY has no real infrastructure to support this, now or in the future.
Microsoft, being a SOFTWARE company that just happens to sell the HARDWARE so they can get subscriptions to their SOFTWARE SERVICES, is already very well positioned to exploit their vast Azure back-end infrastructure in current and future products. Their expertise in Operating Systems and virtualization already gives them a huge leg-up in backwards compatibility (everything runs on the Xbox Series, from OXB to Series X/S games.)
I predict that there won't be a PS6 at all. Even though the PS division is keeping SONY afloat, it won't get the R&D money in the future due to the huge financial problems in the other divisions, and there is no way that SONY can challenge Microsoft in the back-end computing or "Streaming" arena.
There will be a PS5 Slim, and maybe even a PS5 Pro, but they won't be anymore successful than the PS4 Pro was. Microsoft has a "killer" product in "xCloud" that Sony just can't replicate (and yes I know all about "Playstation Now".)
The future is Gaming as a Service (GAAS) and Sony can't compete technically or financially with Microsoft in that arena.
The PS5 is a great product, and the games are great too, but the future is very dark for the Playstation product lines. No handheld, no streaming platform, no back-end infrastructure, no in-house software engineering expertise, no money to innovate in the future, and most importantly, no path forward in a "Streaming-First" future.
The Music Industry showed the way to a "Streaming First" future, and the Movie/TV industry is hot on it's heels. The Gaming Industry is bigger than both of those put together, and it will inevitably HAVE to go the same route.
I get the frustration of missing content, since Microsoft has been failing at releasing major games for a few years now. That said, I don't understand this point: "Xbox has The Outer Worlds 2, Avowed, The Elder Scrolls IV, Starfield, Fable, Hellblade 2, Indiana Jones, State of Decay 3, and plenty other AAA titles in development right now, many of which don't have release windows, let alone release dates." Microsoft has games that seem to all be multiple years away. None of those have shown anything of significance that suggests they will be ready sooner than 2023--later in TES6's case, since they've already said it was going to be positioned as a post-Starfield offering. With as many games as we've seen delayed, Sony's silence (if it comes with consistency in their delivery dates, rather than having to delay things) could be a good thing. It would be nice to see them get another major game or two onto the board, though. Horizon was meant to be out shortly, which would have left them with little to excite the fans over the next 12-18 months. Hopefully they do have something to share before too much longer, but there shouldn't be that much reason to fear Microsoft when their MO has been to buy an existing studio and let them take an eternity to actually release stuff.
You sort of make the author's point when you say "With as many games as we've seen delayed, Sony's silence (if it comes with consistency in their delivery dates, rather than having to delay things) could be a good thing." When she says, "Xbox has The Outer Worlds 2, Avowed, The Elder Scrolls IV, Starfield, Fable, Hellblade 2, Indiana Jones, State of Decay 3, and plenty other AAA titles in development right now, many of which don't have release windows, let alone release dates." the key part is the last statement. Microsoft has come out and said these are coming but haven't committed to any release dates or even release windows, so there is no delay that can happen. It is just Xbox saying this is what we have in the works, so get excited for that. This article points out that a gamer looking to buy a new system has a good roadmap of what is coming if they choose an Xbox, but for PlayStation it is looking at a map where only a small corner is revealed. When choosing between the two, I know I'd pick Xbox just by knowing what is coming, as opposed to PlayStation, where I can only guess what might be coming.
Thank you and well said! That's what I was trying to get across :)
Thank you for signing up to Android Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.