Even if Android is ready for eSIM tech your carrier probably isn't

SIM cards
(Image credit: Samuel Contreras/Android Central)

Some folks are saying the Pixel 8 may launch as an "eSIM only" device in some markets. If that happens it's not going to go very smoothly because phone carriers either aren't ready or aren't willing to help it go smoothly.

This is all speculation at this point, but it wouldn't be very shocking if it happened. Google has been working on better eSIM support in Android for a while and Android 14 should have an all-new way to transfer subscriber data from one phone to another.

That's cool — eSIM is a great idea, and I've been using one since 2019, when the technology was first used in the Google Pixel 2, and haven't had any issues with it. But I didn't have to deal with Verizon or AT&T to set it up. Instead, I clicked a button in the Google Fi app, and it "just worked." 

I'm one of the lucky few, though. Most people agree that the world isn't ready for an eSIM-only phone yet.

What is eSIM?

Still of the Pixel 8 Pro from a leaked promo video

(Image credit: EZ / Twitter)

You probably first heard of eSIM when Apple announced that the iPhone 14 was an eSIM-only device in the United States. The tech has been around a bit longer though.

The easy explanation is that eSIM replaces the little card you get from your carrier that provides service once you install it and set it up. On a "normal" phone there is circuitry that reads data from the SIM card provided by your carrier. that data includes your account information and your phone number, and can hold some additional user data like a list of contacts if you want it to. Don't do that, by the way, because the contacts app on your phone is better in every way.

In an eSIM phone, there is a small bit of memory where the same sort of data can be written and your phone gets the information it needs from that memory instead of reading a chip.

Technologically, it's better in every way. You never have to find a paperclip and insert a little card in your phone, it can be switched to an alternative profile with a new number on the fly, and it can — in theory — be tied to an online identity like your Google account or Apple ID if you like. Don't do that either if it ever becomes a thing because it's a good way to lock you in to one platform or another.

There are some bad things about eSIM, too. The first is support. In the West, it's easy to find a carrier that supports eSIM (even if they don't support it very well) but in other parts of the world, it's not. This is why the iPhone 14 only launched that way in the U.S. and (presumably) the Pixel 8 will do the same. Also, some of the best MVNO carriers aren't fully eSIM compatible just yet.

Another issue is with security. If you want to take advantage of being able to switch carriers on the fly so you can save a little money — a big feature for folks who travel — it means more companies have your details and credit card number on file. We all know how well companies, big and small, protect that sort of user data.

The biggest issue is still the carrier. It's been over a year since the launch of an eSIM-only phone and your carrier still sucks when it comes to setting one up. 

In theory, you should simply be able to scan a QR code, wait a minute or two, and you're done. Instead you will be forced to find a way to make a support call using the number you want to activate or visit an actual retail location.

Even though the bulk of Pixel 8 sales will be online most everyone who buys one will still have to take the time to go to a carrier store to get it activated instead of putting the little card into its little tray the way we're all used to doing.

You don't even want to think about switching your account to a different phone once activated without spending the day at the carrier store.

Google has no control over any of the steps in this process and none of the tools and support it has built into Android 14 will help. It will be the same shitshow we saw with iPhone 14 activations, just at a much smaller scale because Google will never sell as many phones as Apple does.

I don't know if these rumors are true and we'll see an eSIM-only Pixel 8 in the U.S. or elsewhere. I don't think we will, at least not yet anyway. If it happens and you aren't using Google Fi be prepared to visit a carrier store to get it activated. Your carrier just wants to have more control than it needs.

Jerry Hildenbrand
Senior Editor — Google Ecosystem

Jerry is an amateur woodworker and struggling shade tree mechanic. There's nothing he can't take apart, but many things he can't reassemble. You'll find him writing and speaking his loud opinion on Android Central and occasionally on Twitter.

  • Lawrie Sherratt
    Too true, I recently had a message from EE here in the UK my ESim was ready to download. Did this and it made my normal sim card unusable. Was unable to make/ receive a call or text Contacted support via land line and they couldn't fix it. Had to wait for a new sim . Totally unacceptable.
    Reply
  • fuzzylumpkin
    Lawrie Sherratt said:
    Too true, I recently had a message from EE here in the UK my ESim was ready to download. Did this and it made my normal sim card unusable. Was unable to make/ receive a call or text Contacted support via land line and they couldn't fix it. Had to wait for a new sim . Totally unacceptable.
    They won't even let me switch to eSIM as I'm on Pay As You Go, sounds like I may have been saved a headache though.
    Reply
  • ChrisJahr
    There are many issues from an eSIM adoption standpoint, one of the greatest barriers to adoption are actually the SIM vendors themselves. Unlike the silicon valley giants that have mastered technology and changed our lives at scale, the SIM industry is dominated by four companies that comprise about 80% market share (Thales, Idemia, G+D Mobile Security and Valid). For 30 years these companies have been pumping out SIM cards from factories around the world, and to flip to a fully digital paradigm requires a complete change in mindset and operational orientation. The introduction of the eSIM puts these companies squarely into the real time provisioning path forcing them to operate more like Amazon Web Services and less like a process driven factory. But as history as demonstrated, many companies have failed to successfully transition. Just think of Kodak and Blockbuster Video just to name two.

    Because of this, wireless carriers have not had a high degree of confidence in the SIM vendors resulting in relatively low eSIM adoption. But rather than proactively investing and building out highly scalable eSIM infrastructure, the SIM vendors took the approach to price gouge the carriers. In the SIM card days, carriers ordered SIM cards, received them and paid, but now SIM vendors have begun charging for hosting eSIM platforms and their setup fees, they charge to develop eSIM templates (called profiles), they charge to create an eSIM and they charge to download them. And on top of that, they provide lackluster support at best. So with multiple costs that carriers must pay, it should come as no surprise that adoption has been low, even though eSIM technology has been around for over 10 years now.

    As handset OEMs embark on their eSIM-only roadmaps, the single greatest risk is that the SIM vendors do not perform well resulting in failed activations and/or fumbled eSIM downloads. The only way to mitigate this is for the wireless carriers to take full control of their eSIM ecosystem, as after all, who is better at operating wireless networks than the wireless operators themselves.
    Reply
  • hmmm
    I'm not interested in a phone without a physical sim. I will use the pixel 7 for 5+years before I switch to an esim only phone and at that point I will go with a different company or get the last used phone with a physical sim. This means I likely can continue using a phone with a physical sim for almost a decade at least in the worst case scenario.

    I recently tried out an apple device and went with a iPhone 13 due to the hassle esim causes. My physical sim takes literally 10 seconds to swap.

    I lived through the sprint CDMA days and will never go back to allowing the carrier that much control over the phone I want to use.
    Reply
  • Narcopolypse
    2019? What are you talking about? I've been using exclusively eSIM since I got my Nexus 5X. It's been around since way before 2019.
    Reply
  • mustang7757
    This is true not friendly switching esims but TMobile is . Still you have to contact the carrier and can't do this through your account which is stupid.
    Reply
  • Jerry Hildenbrand
    Narcopolypse said:
    2019? What are you talking about? I've been using exclusively eSIM since I got my Nexus 5X. It's been around since way before 2019.
    The Nexus 5X requires a physical SIM card. Carriers advertising a reprogrammable SIM card as an eSIM aren't being 100% honest.

    The Pixel 2 was the first phone to launch with an actual embedded chip for subscriber identity. You did find a typo though as it launched in 2017 not 2019.
    Reply
  • Kashif Nawaz
    In my country all carriers are pushing eSIM very hard. And some giving eSIM only discount but the problem is that if I switched a phone I have to buy a new eSIM, as one eSIM QR CODE is valid for one mobile only. Untill there's a way to easily transfer eSIM from one mobile to another I'm sticking with Physical SIM.
    Reply
  • mustang7757
    Kashif Nawaz said:
    In my country all carriers are pushing eSIM very hard. And some giving eSIM only discount but the problem is that if I switched a phone I have to buy a new eSIM, as one eSIM QR CODE is valid for one mobile only. Untill there's a way to easily transfer eSIM from one mobile to another I'm sticking with Physical SIM.
    Yeah ATT here in the US is a pain to switch between devices so I went back to regular sim card
    Reply
  • kxc1279
    hmmm said:
    I'm not interested in a phone without a physical sim. I will use the pixel 7 for 5+years before I switch to an esim only phone and at that point I will go with a different company or get the last used phone with a physical sim. This means I likely can continue using a phone with a physical sim for almost a decade at least in the worst case scenario.

    I recently tried out an apple device and went with a iPhone 13 due to the hassle esim causes. My physical sim takes literally 10 seconds to swap.

    I lived through the sprint CDMA days and will never go back to allowing the carrier that much control over the phone I want to use.
    100%. Unfortunately I did get the 14 Pro Max. Converted the pSIM from my iPhone 13 to eSIM, then transferred the eSIM to the 14. I did NOT do further research as to how easily it would be to transfer that iPhone eSIM to another non-iPhone smartphone. Suffice to say, NOT even easy b/c it's NOT possible. I'd have to contact the carrier. Truly reminds me of the Verizon & Sprint SIM Provisioning era. I just stopped paying my prepaid carrier and deleted the eSIM profile. Now, I know I'm NOT the mainstream user that the carriers are targeting. In the end though, IMHO, this takes away control from the end user. The ease of popping the pSIM & inserting into another phone is kaput, more control for the carriers. My last iPhone of course, lesson learned.
    Reply