Sprint LTE

Earlier, Sprint announced that its 4G LTE network will be coming to Baltimore by the end of summer. It has now added 3 more cities to that announcement. The lucky markets, in addition to Baltimore, are Baltimore, MD, Gainesville, GA, Manhattan/Junction City, KS and Sherman-Denison, TX

The LTE network will go live in these markets by Labor Day, which is September 3rd. We're seeing the carriers competing to expand their LTE networks the quickest, and that's only good for consumers. If you're a Sprint customer and live in one of these markets, you'll soon be able to enjoy the high speeds!

Source: Sprint

 

Reader comments

Sprint bringing 4G LTE to 4 more cities by Labor Day

40 Comments
Sort by Rating

I live in Houston TX and LTE only works in the inner city. Go to the suburbs and the Sprint store reps will tell you that they can't show you LTE because towers aren't fully up. I feel really bad for all those people that jumped on the LTE train ahead of schedule.
I'll stick with my Wimax until Sprint can make good on LTE coverage.

Another sell lost because of a crappy network.

You tend to forget that the vast majority of Sprint customers, myself included, have NEVER had WiMax coverage. So for all of us, jumping to an LTE phone is absolutely no loss, and quite a logical move.

I'm mad they haven't announced chicago yet, since it was one of the first cities to get wimax. Although it seems that their strategy is to launch in smaller markets first, where it's probably less difficult to stress test and iron out issues.

I live in Dallas-Ft. Worth and it's not up all over the metroplex yet. I get a signal for like 2 minutes before it's gone again. I'll be glad when the suburbs can get the signal consistently.

As of last weekend, it wasn't available at all in downtown or uptown, or near DFW airport. Really strange...makes you wonder just where exactly it was up.

I too, am looking forward to Chicago area getting LTE. Although its gonna suck buying a new phone OUTRIGHT but I'll get over it! I did try talking my wife into taking my ET4G so I could use her upgrade!! LOL! No Dice!

Just out of curiosity, when they fire up an LTE in a current Wimax market, Does LTE affect Wimax performance?

Poor Poor kooja_IIT. So since you were one of the first to get WiMax, you think that everyone that had no WiMax should have to wait until every WiMax area is covered first?

Can you be MORE selfish and self-centered??

Im tired of Sprints sorry ass!! No LTE in So. Cal. and we are paying for a phone that as LTE but no LTE service from sprint.

You are paying for a phone, regardless of what network is available- 3G, WiMax, LTE. Your monthly service with an LTE phone cost no more than a WiMax phone or a 3G only phone.

Your argument makes no sense.

Considering how crappy the 4g coverage is in LA/SoCal it would be nice to see LTE (and LOTS more GSM) phones/ access here.....

Wow! That's an impressive list of metro markets there, Sprint. You really out did yourself this time! >_>

I am still waiting on Atlanta! :-( The service has been extremely spotty and inconsistent. My nearest Sprint store still doesn't have LTE coverage. It looks like the announced dates are just when you might see some coverage, but it may take them a while to provide decent coverage to any city.

I can't believe Junction City and Manhattan, Ks get it before the biggest damn city in Kansas(Wichita). I am slowly running out of patience with Sprint.

Gainesville, GA? You gotta be kidding. The only thing I can think is that they are going for smaller markets to try to get the bugs out.

I'm not surprised. Gainesville is practically a suburb of Atlanta. I just wish they would finish building out the city before they expanded outward... According to their coverage map, I live and work in LTE coverage areas, but I can only get LTE in one small area about a mile from my house.

Larger markets take much much longer to complete, this is why they are working on smaller areas simultaneously. Additionally the various vendors involved often times are not ready in some markets. This is a complex construction project. Attempting to complete all the markets in a market sized predetermined order would take at least twice the time.

why should the hillbillies get LTE first?

Sprint should have started with the major cities first ie NYC, LA, etc.

Baltimore is a major City, We have a major world trade center and Sprint is losing a lot of business to VZW in the business sector.

Larger markets take much much longer to complete, this is why they are working on smaller areas simultaneously. Additionally the various vendors involved often times are not ready in some markets. This is a complex construction project. Attempting to complete all the markets in a market sized predetermined order would take at least twice the time.

I'm really trying to keep faith in sprint but its starting to dwindle.Hopefully we will get some bigger markets soon.

Why is Sprint setting up their LTE in these small very low populated markets when there are millions of new potential customers on the East and West Coasts that are dying to try out their new service. I do not think their plan is very well thought out. Big cities with millions of new customers should be on their new LTE list like NY, Boston, Chicago, LA, SF, ect. ect. Just My Opinion.

They have been tearing down and building in those markets for months now. It takes longer than smaller markets. There is a lot of material to read available on S4GRU regarding this nationwide build out.

Why not Manhattan, NY and the NY Metro area where there are more people waiting for this than all the other markets put together???