Why does the U.S. government mistrust Huawei and not ZTE or Lenovo?
Huawei's big plans to make a breakthrough into the U.S. smartphone market have been crushed. There's no gentle way to say that, so I'll just say it.
As CES 2018 was drawing to a close, AT&T and Verizon, which were both all but confirmed to be "official" carriers of the Mate 10 Pro, both announced that they wouldn't be selling any Huawei phones after pressure from the U.S. government because Huawei phones being used in the states would pose a security risk.
This pressure became official soon after as a bill was sent to Congress that would ban any government business from being done on a network that used Huawei (or ZTE) networking equipment. In the same week, we learned that government officials were urging AT&T to stop doing business with Huawei altogether and to stop working on a 5G network with the Chinese company. Once again, national security concerns were stated as the reason behind the request.
We're not done. In February 2018, right as the Mate 10 Pro was set to go up for sale in North America, heads of U.S. intelligence agencies came forward and urged Americans to not buy Huawei phones. FBI Director Christopher Wray explains the reasoning:
Most recently we found out the Best Buy, One of Huawei's biggest U.S. retail outlets for unlocked phones, was going to stop selling all Huawei products. This includes phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches, and routers.
But why just Huawei? If there are concerns with electronics made in China when it comes to security and privacy, why not OnePlus or Lenovo or simply all Chinese companies?
I took the time to individualize and link each time Huawei faced a roadblock when it comes to U.S. sales so it could be more obvious that the government really doesn't want us to buy Huawei products. Another thing about the paragraphs above is that they also cover the times intelligence or other government officials warned against other Chinese electronic products, with a lone mention of ZTE commerical networking equipment. It appears that Huawei is being singled out, so there has to be a reason.
There happens to be several reasons, and they aren't about the end produts themselves as much as the technology inside them, much of which is done in-house at Huawei. Simply put, there are fears that Huawei is controlled by the government of China and U.S. officials don't trust the chipsets and low-level firmware that Huawei makes themselves. This is why they don't want Americans buying or using them.
Making your own processors then arranging them in a mobile chipset is a rarity. Apple does this, as does Samsung (which also makes components to sell to other manufacturers). But any other instances are few and far between back to the time when Motorola flip phones ruled the market. It also takes more than just silicon and copper as there is a lot of machine-level software and firmware involved so processors can talk to things like modems or graphics adapters. You'll find a Huawei-made chip inside all the company's high-end phones as well as the network routers and switches and transfer equipment Huawei builds for companies like AT&T to run their cellular network. In plain language, Huawei makes the parts inside the phones and other gear an it's almost impossible to independently review that they are doing what Huawei claims. The U.S. government is afraid that these components can be instructed to eavesdrop on our digital communications and send it all back to the Chinese government.
I'm not going to attempt to assess these claims; that's for three-letter government agencies to do and they say we shouldn't be using Huawei gear. It is their job to look for, then look at, potential ways the country could be put at risk. My personal opinion is that this is a wise choice for networking equipment (especially when used for government communications) but looks a bit hollow when it comes to the company's phones because of how updates are routed through the internet to our Android products. You should evaluate these claims yourself and not allow me or anyone else to make the decision for you, though.
Another reason is a bit less technology related and leans towards the economic side. Huawei is the largest provider of commercial networking equipment (products that carriers and internet providers use) in the world and they are actively involved with the creation of 5G standards and network design. Other Chinese companies that make networking products don't make their own components and rely largely on companies like Marvell or Broadcom (yes, that Broadcom) when it comes to the individual parts inside. Huawei is also making big strides in Artificial Intelligence, both at the consumer facing and backend tech that makes it work. This means technology issues aren't the only concern and the U.S. does not want a company they assume is conencted to the Chinese governemnt to be the front runner in the next generation of communications.
Again, I can't remark on the validity of these claims other than saying the people who are in the position to make them think we shouldn't use Huawei products. With a phone or watch or router from another company, the "brains" aren't made by potential Chinese government agents, which is what the U.S. intelligence service is implying. If this is true and we could be plauged with sophisticated spyware they are only doing their job; every risk, no matter how small, needs to be assessed. The fact that other countries don't have these concerns could mean China is targeting the U.S. only, or that the tech involved is so advanced other countries aren't seeing the same thing, or that the CIA, FBI, and NSA are just wrong. Any or al of these outcomes are possible.
Huawei insists that these claims are false and that their products have the highest standards when it comes to security and privacy. That's to be expected, and could very well be the truth. We're not here to refute or affirm any of these claims, but I feel it is important that everyone knows why Huawei is being singled out in the sea of Chinese electronics manufacturers. When it comes to functionality, features, and value we can assess Huawei products and we all appreciate how good they are.
Get the Android Central Newsletter
Instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Jerry is an amateur woodworker and struggling shade tree mechanic. There's nothing he can't take apart, but many things he can't reassemble. You'll find him writing and speaking his loud opinion on Android Central and occasionally on Twitter.
B) Huawei committed industrial espionage 2017 (vs T-Mobile) https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/huawei_spied_us_jury_finds/
I'm not Chinese or American so couldn't really care less about the US being blocked from buying Huawei devices. Huawei would like to sell their phones there too but they aren't really bothered, they've continued to grow rapidly regardless and from what I've read they'll be doubling down on European sales instead to make up for any sales lost in the US so Apple and Samsung will still lose marketshare to Huawei and they'll largely be unaffected
Nokia are next biggest network supplier,they us huawie hardware too !1
As their is no prove China spy and there is a lot that USA spies, foreign countries and tehir own population when their constitution says: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search ,,," "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ..." "No law of Congress can place in the hands of officials connected with the Postal Service any authority to invade the secrecy of letters and such sealed packages in the mail; and all regulations adopted as to mail matter of this kind must be in subordination to the great principle embodied in the fourth amendment of the Constitution." And by extension the secrecy of letters can be translated to secret of tele communications too, but we know it is not the case.
I seems strange to me no other government seems to have an issue.
Ditto on Apple. They thought china would be their new golden egg...didnt work out. The US is still by FAR their main source of revenue. They would never risk loosing that business by being banned.
2-When you have a 6 inch screen, I hope like hell it DOESNT have a 4k UHD screen...cause the small of a screen, you wont see or notice the extra pixels but your BATTERY will sure as hell will.
So they fact they can do that is nothing more then a marketing spec and not a practical one...something qualcom understands a bit better.
Any organisation can put out a warning for whatever reasons they like.
US secretary thinks there is a threat ( so they say. ) The rest of the world does not.
Suppose that's why it's only £20 a month for 100GB or data.
I live in a small village in south Yorkshire.
Nothing on 02, 3 or Vodafone.
Get good phone signal now but only about 120K/s. Data
Even our broadband is crap 3-4 MBps.
Bloody hell when all those nukes go off it won't be too good for the networks regardless of hacked servers...
Its in their vested interest to keep out economy strong in turn to keep theirs.
I assume you exaggerate for effect?
Be a bloody short and very hot war!
Well, those were accidental and not intended. And they were so "low level" it took how long to finally find them?? Now imagine if Huawei, who makes their own chips and the firmware that goes with them, makes a Meltdown and Spectre vulnerability but do so INTENTIONALLY. It would take a long time to find and detect...once it IS found, they can turn around and say "Oh it was an accident..like Intels"...and the whole time could potentially give access to that vulnerability to their government. Not saying it is happening...but it could....and that is the concern.
Probably the safest chips there are.
More likely in my opinion US security can't break their encryption and are uncomfortable with their citizens having secure networks they can't spy on. PS just feeding the paranoid.
I assumed as reported it was discovered by Intel themselves.
I'll inform GCHQ, Mossad, KGB and DGSE they should look again...
But in all honesty Intel chips or processors having a security issue "is" massive.
Those chips are in a lot of very important computers and I can understand US reluctance to using Huwia equipment in their infrastructure but
I can't see how phones ( just the handsets) running on US networks could really be the same sort of a security issue?
Huawei has been actively engaged, maybe not now, but in the past of industrial espionage.
They copied Cisco source code and designs. The source code theft was so bad that bugs were the exact bugs in Cisco products. The founder of Huawei is a former military officer in The People's Liberation Army. I won't buy another Huawei phone because the support is horrible.
Ask anyone that had issues from a Nexus 6P that didn't buy Google's Nexus Protect.
I count 6 as I was quickly reading thought this article:
- "end produts" (supposed to be "products")
- "gear an its" (supposed to be "and")
- "to do and they say" (needs a comma)
- "conencted" (was this supposed to be "connected"?)
- "sophisticated spyware they are only" (desparately needs a comma)
- "or al of" (supposed to be "all") Seriously, Android Central... Grow up already (as a tech news outlet), please!... So that I can promote you as such.