The differences between Android and iOS are rapidly evaporating
Through years of feature cloning and one-upmanship, Android and iOS have slowly become the same thing. Every year we see Apple and Google take to the stage with broad messages, which sound like different overall missions, only to see individual features that closely resemble the other offering.
As I sit here with an iPhone X to my left and a Google Pixel 2 to my right, I can honestly pick up either and comfortably use it without feeling like any one major feature is missing from the experience I appreciate on the other. Through no manipulation of my own, aside from the apps I choose to install, the differences between these two experiences have all but faded away.
For my use, and I suspect for many others as well, there are no major functional differences between iOS and Android anymore.
How we got here
I've been an Android guy from day one — picked up an HTC G1 because it gave me a Linux terminal I could carry in my pocket. I was a server admin at the time, so being able to remote in from the tiny computer in my pocket held tremendous value. Also, having come from the LG enV line of phones, I appreciated the hardware keyboard. While I have bought and tried every iPhone that has ever been released, I never really enjoyed the experience. Android got its hooks in me first, but never deep enough for me to not try what was offered elsewhere.
Today, the iPhone X feels just as feature-complete and enjoyable to use as my other favorite phone, because both companies have made so many moves to copy features found on the other side.
A lot has changed for both iOS and Android since those early days. As each of these platforms matured, it became necessary to implement both hardware and software features others found compelling. Tech nerds look at little things like the ability to copy and paste or the decision to use larger displays as these major efforts to copy the competition, but the reality is the major things were already fairly similar. You pick up the phone, open an app, use the app, and put the phone back down.
As much as Apple likes to crow about security or Google about intelligence, the truth is the way most people use their phones has always depended a lot more on whether your phone had access to the things your friends have access to. So these minor things that made the apps easier to use or more convenient to share from became priorities to implement everywhere.
If you look deeply at these operating systems, you can see the small differences so many tech bloggers will claim are enormous which separate them. Android makes it easier to share information between apps, for example. If I click a YouTube link in one app, it always opens the YouTube app to play the video instead of opening YouTube in the browser. Meanwhile, Apple offers the kind of granular control over the information your apps take and deliver that I dream of on Android.
Neither of these things matter to someone like my sister, whose biggest concern is whether her phone has the latest fitness app update or a fun new camera app to play with her kids. These details only matter to nerds like me, and with each generation, those differences fade.
When the most important thing is apps, it becomes important to make sure your operating system offers the best version of an experience and then make sure it can't be had elsewhere. For Apple, that app has always been iMessage.
Google has tried and failed to capture the magic of popular messaging apps more times than I care to count, while Apple fans consider receiving messages from someone not using an iPhone a mark of shame. Meanwhile, Google's computational photography keeps the Pixel phones in the camera lead without actually offering a superior sensor. Apple and Google could easily share here, but these apps are now ammunition in the effort to encourage users to switch from one to the other.
Where we go from here
I've spent a lot of time over-simplifying the comparison between these two to make a point, but it's important to highlight one major difference. In this effort to make apps a form of currency, Google faces challenges that Apple will never need to worry about.
Samsung controls the vast majority of Android's market share, and regularly tries to make its own versions of Google's software stand out from Google's. The Pixel phones aren't the most popular Android phones, but they set the standard for how Android should look and feel. Not only do the Galaxy phones not do everything the Pixel phones can do, but the experience is also muddied with bad copies of Google's best features. Google lacks the absolute control of its platform Apple possesses, which is why a lot of changes come through its Play Services system instead of through full operating system updates. Google can't update every part of a phone this way, but the parts this software can touch are easy to adjust and improve almost instantly.
There's also a big problem with universality in the Apple ecosystem. If you use all Apple products, the experience can be quite good. Deviate from that, and things start to fall apart.
The only fitness tracker that talks to Apple's excellent health ring and achievement system the right way is the Apple Watch. HomePod is only really useful if you use Apple Music. But it goes deeper than hardware, and that's where things become truly problematic. Apple's keyboard isn't my favorite, but I can never truly disable it in favor of one I prefer. The Apple keyboard takes over whenever I'm entering a password in order to protect me, and then some apps will default to Apple's keyboard instead of the one I have selected.
Another example is the browser. Safari is the default for everything and if you deviate from that your general experience across the OS suffers unnecessarily. Granted, in this case, Safari is generally the best performing browser on iOS, but it's an unmistakably user-hostile move to tell users they can have whatever apps they want and then artificially limit the capabilities of those non-Apple products.
Many — possibly even a majority — of Apple users are happy with platform lock-in. Similarly, a great many Android users are happy with whatever is provided on the phone to start. This is why many U.S. carriers tried for so long to exercise greater control over the apps that came included on phones; the money to be made from app developers who coveted that space in front of our eyeballs was enormous. And it continues to happen in a lesser sense today because it works.
The apps included on a phone are more likely to be the one used, unless that person has friends or co-workers all using some other app. While we spend an increasing amount of time in apps, research suggests more than half of us don't regularly go looking for new ones to install.
The bottom line here, at least for me, is how impressive it is for these two platforms to have grown to be nearly indistinguishable from a functionality perspective. The buttons may be in different places, and the number of taps and swipes I have to accomplish a task may be slightly higher or lower, but I can't point to any one thing in my day-to-day I can't do on one of these phones that I can do on the other. I have a little more control over how things look on Android, and I'm a fan of the way I can (sometimes) pick up my iPad and be right where I left off in an article on my iPhone, but there's very little else about the experiences I can point at and say I absolutely must have to enjoy my phone and see it isn't available on the other.
To me, that's fantastic news for Android. Apple and Google are competing on an absurdly even footing for this to be possible. Comparing the quality of cameras is a matter of the most minute details. The performance of these high-end phones is nearly indistinguishable. All of my apps exist everywhere. As a tech blogger with access to all of this hardware, I'm in a uniquely privileged position to make this claim, but I can honestly switch from an iPhone X to a Pixel 2 and not really feel like I'm making a huge switch. The maturity of these platforms makes that possible, but it also makes the rush to make other things that keep users from switching a greater priority than polishing some rough edges in this next generation.
Get the Android Central Newsletter
Instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
One problem is that Apple limits iOS to only iPhones & iPads whereas Android can be installed on any device. Also, Apple does not make it's own apps for Android. Apple tightly controls iOS more than Google with Android
ask your mom or aunt what flac files are, or 24 bit files are. they couldn't care less.
ask mom what she uses for music: pandora, iheart radio ... etc
even being fairly nerdy myself, think half of what you are saying is just nerd garbage.
use Apple music or google music. files: seriously, are you going to Seriously "work" on files on a 5" screen?
files: if i seriously need them. google drive. icloud drive. drop box. MS OneDrive.......etc
NO ONE but tech nerds trying to be different for bragging rights or whatever uses Linux.
1 in a million people even knows what Linux is.
There is Nothing wrong with Windows or macOS, other than the fact you chose to Not like them.
I have the iPhone X (& Note 8) and the notch literally disappears after using it for 5 minutes.
it is not an "abomination" ... pfft... drama-queen much?
i disagree with your assessment. 99% of iOS & Android users do Nothing that you do on a phone.
Sharing from an iPad couldn't Be an easier. Maybe you just are so smart, you don't know how to use it....
of course it would also help if you understood at all what the author was saying. fanboyism prevented comprehension.
OP was spot on.
If "Pixel phones set the standard for how Android should look and feel", then every Android phone needs to be bland, featureless, and not innovative. Do I have to remind you that the reason why Android features multi-windows, power saving mode, do not disturb mode, quick settings, quick camera launch, smart Lock, display color modes, etc. is basically... Samsung's "muddied" smartphones?
Those features, that you called garbage a few years ago, but which you couldn't live without today, and that you now call "Google's best features"... And in a few months, when Google will announce that Android's next version adds support for stylus tools, control over the resolution of apps, a video and sound enhancer... you will break out into tears before Lord Google, thanking Him for such innovative features.
And some people may say that's coz Apple have they own environment. However whos "faukt" is that? Only Apple can be blamed that they don't want to work with other companies.
Android devices with Dual SIM capability wouldn't be better? Both numbers in one place = no need to keep 2 devices, everything in really one place (nt on 2 devices in one environment).
I'm the ONLY person in my family that desires to use a phone like this. My wife, her parents, my parents, and siblings (save for one brother) all have no usage scenario where they would need that level of interaction from a mobile phone. Sure, a few of them use Android, but most of them are doing great with iPhones. Those other few with Androids use their phones entirely "stock," making almost no customization other than wallpapers and/or changing the ringtone. I have used both systems over the years, and I do agree with this article for the most part.
My one big nitpick here is notifications, which I view as a basic functionality of a smartphone. iOS is laughably behind here. Android's method of notifying users of information is light years ahead, and should definitely be the next feature for these 2 companies to copy from one to the other.
On the other hand, their closed ecosystem seems to work better for those that are not technically inclined.
Android on the other hand is very flexible as well as very powerful. But they have seen the prices that Apple gets away with charging so they have been jacking their hardware prices up as well.
I happen to like removable batteries and I have multiple batteries for the Androids that I own. I also like to be able to use removable SD cards instead of paying Apple many, many, hundreds of dollars for an extra 200 GB of storage.
I also like being able to root my phones, which I really don't need anymore, and I don't think that ability exists with Apple products.
I do have a single IPhone that someone gave me along with 4-5 Android phones that I have purchased.
If I am spending the money, Android is my first choice and Apple would be a very distant second.
So yeah, ios is limiting and that's why Android will continue to be more popular in Africa and most parts of Asia. Apple can sit in their western world bubble.
For most people the $250 Android is perfectly adequate. Most iOS users probably never tax anything to the limit (other than batteries). When The Register calls it a "Cupertino idiot tax" they're not joking for probably 60% of buyers.
That's a difference which is if anything opening up further with time.