Skip to main content

The Iowa Caucus proves that sometimes tech goes really bad

Iowa-caucus-ballots
Iowa-caucus-ballots (Image credit: Getty)

A lot of people think technology is the answer to everything. They may be right, but only if the tech itself is ready. At the Iowa Caucus on Monday night, we saw what a disaster looks like when the tech isn't ready.

I'm not going to get into politics and don't care about the caucus vs. primary debate, or which candidate is best or anything of the sort. I'm only here to marvel at the utter failure and try to explore it. After all, it was the real star of the horror show.

What we know

Shadow App

Source: Motherboard (Image credit: Source: Motherboard)

For starters, no votes were changed and every vote will be counted so everyone can stop talking about election interference.

No matter what candidates are saying, nobody won anything in Iowa.

What did happen was an untested app was distributed in a horrible way to untrained officials that was supposed to let them transmit results into a central server so everything could be tallied. Paper ballots are still there and the app wasn't used by the public for voting purposes.

We also know that a big part of the problem was the backend service that was there to support the app. It was never stress-tested and busted. Officials would try to send in their results and only received an error message. Telephone support was either bogged down or non-existent and the whole mess was the work of a company called Shadow, Inc.

See more

The election process worked as it should — you filled out a little piece of paper, slipped it into a box, and someone counted everything. After that, everything went south. But this is all just the result; the distribution of the app to people who received no training was equally horrible.

TestFairy

Test Fairy

Source: Motherboard (Image credit: Source: Motherboard)

Thanks to some sleuthing by Motherboard and the Washington Post, we know a little bit about how the app was distributed to officials.

TestFairy is a platform used to test apps outside of Google Play or the App Store. There are several platforms that work this way, and in itself, this isn't that strange; it gives developers a false sense of privacy and security. Motherboard quickly proved that it really does neither.

You need the training to be any sort of election official. The same goes for using buggy apps.

I'll ignore the ageism from the Post but point out that caucus chairs received zero training about how to install an app through TesyFairy, let alone what to do when the app screwed up. Motherboard couldn't even get the app to boot on one of the Android phones it tried. Grandma or not, you need a little bit of information to handle a bug disguised as an application.

Shadow, Inc. wasn't ready for prime time when it came time to tally the votes, but that's not its biggest mistake. As ZDNet points out, there was no need to reinvent the wheel, as Amazon already has an elections as a service platform (opens in new tab) it built for Obama, and Salesforce has done this a time or two.

Shadow, Inc. probably didn't need to be hired at all, as it looks like any IT professional with an adequate staff could use the existing tools to successfully do what it wasn't able to pull off.

What did we all learn?

The electoral process in the United States is due for an overhaul, and tech can play a big part in it all. Shadow, Inc. may have failed in Iowa, but the principle that it's 2020 and we are connected enough that slips of paper read aloud over a telephone call is archaic. Heck, even the DMV is partially automated and we all know how slowly anything to do with the DMV moves.

Tech can help, but it needs to move slowly and methodically when used in the electoral process.

But there isn't a need to go too far, too fast. Shadow, Inc. might well be staffed by very competent engineers who rushed out a faulty product, but it didn't need to find a better way when there are already services and methods to do what it was contracted to do.

Maybe the time to experiment with something different is at the local level, where ballots are measured in the thousands rather than the millions, and a tech company can be present to make sure it's awesome new way of doing something we've been doing since the days of ancient Rome actually works.

Until then, make sure you vote so your voice is heard and get ready for another presidential election in the U.S.

Alexa, order me some popcorn.

Jerry Hildenbrand
Jerry Hildenbrand

Jerry is an amateur woodworker and struggling shade tree mechanic. There's nothing he can't take apart, but many things he can't reassemble. You'll find him writing and speaking his loud opinion on Android Central and occasionally on Twitter.

4 Comments
  • The Shadow company is apparently owned by someone affiliated with Hillary Clinton. Enough said.
  • You left out a couple of other mistakes they made. The big one is that no one bothered to confirm that there was adequate cell / internet connected wifi service at the sites. Some parts of Iowa do NOT have good connectivity. And no one bothered to find out who was planning to use the app, or even who downloaded it. Instead they just assumed that "everyone" would use it. (You know what that does...) It's a textbook case of how NOT to roll out technology.
  • Just another example of how everything Democrats touch turns into a steaming pile of shіt.
  • You do bring a certain sophistication to the situation don't you. Three times I've had my posts removed when they weren't even half this offensive.