Phil Nickinson

Let's talk tablets.

Specifically, let's talk Nexus tablets. Forget, for the moment, that as yet there's no such thing as a Nexus tablet. And I'm willing to bet that if Google actually does make its own tablet sometime in the coming months, it won't actually be called "Nexus" anything. (I'll go one further and opine that perhaps the Nexus line has run its course, but that's another column for another day. You folks feel free to steal that idea in the meantime.)

There's been growing talk of some sort of Google-produced tablet. Whispers go back many months, and in December 2011 an Italian newspaper quoted former Google CEO and current Chairman Eric Schmidt as saying "We in the next six months plan to market a tablet of the highest quality." We've seen other posts from analysts and Digitimes (which covers Chinese and Taiwanese manufacturers and often dreams up unicorns as often as it does actual products) that seem to corroborate that Google's producing something.

And on Friday we've seen further rumors from The Verge and Android and Me (who's been peddling this thing for a while now) going back and forth on pricing -- $149 of $199, either of which would be perfectly conceivable for an aggressively priced, Google-backed tablet. And specs, well, specs are specs. Maybe it'll be quad-core. Maybe it'll be dual-core. Maybe it'll have a display so great it'll make the new iPad look like the jacked-up resolution on your grandmother's aging laptop.

None of that matters.

From time to time you'll hear us joke about hardware rumors, saying something like "Breaksclusive! Next-generation hardware rumored to be thinner/lighter/faster than current-generation hardware!" Part of that's just us breaking Wheaton's Law. But that doesn't make it any less true. And in the case of Android hardware over the past year, it's been ridiculously true. I have no idea how many tablets Samsung has announced in the past 12 months. I'm willing to bet there are a great many people at Samsung who couldn't tell you without having to look up the number of tablet models it's released. It really just comes down to this:

The last thing Google needs to do is make Just Another Android Tablet™.

Think about it. What good would a "Google Nexus Tablet" be? What would it bring to the tablet table that we haven't already had for a year now? Thinner? Faster? Lighter? Inevitable. (To a certain extent, anyway.) Stock experience? The Motorola XOOM's had that for a year now, and most other tablets keep relatively the same experience. Price? What's a $149 Just Another Android Tablet™ going to do in the consumer space that the $199 Kindle Fire hasn't done already? Google's got the cash to eat the cost, sure. But Amazon's got the distribution pipeline, and the head start.

(By the way: Don't call this unicorn a Kindle Fire killer unless it's capable of sneaking into people's homes and disintegrating the millions of Kindle Fires already sold and is able to negate Amazon's current retail stance.)

I said this a long while ago in regards to the Galaxy Nexus and Ice Cream Sandwich — the key is going to be software. Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich meant relative fresh start for Android. That said, it's been a troubled birth, as we still have a scant few devices with ICS, though that'll start changing fairly soon. (Though certainly not soon enough.) The tablet rumors we've been reading all share a common thread — they're thinking too small.

The next version of Android — by all (unsourced and uncreative) accounts it'll be called "Jelly Bean" — has to be more than just an iteration of a mobile operating system. You've undoubtedly heard the rumors of some sort of Google entertainment system. Or that Google Play is the start of something bigger. All this, I believe, is true. If there's one thing we know about Google, its that it has much more patience than those of us who don't create things for a living. (And certainly more patience than those of us who report on things for a living.) Google's in all this for the long haul.

Google TV was a disappointment. Android tablets have, on a macro level, been a failure to launch. Smartphones stand out, but there's certainly room for improvement. We know this. Google knows this. Word on the street is that we're all about to get a big lesson in WiDi, which in and of itself presents its own questions. (For most people, that'll be "What the hell is WiDi, and what can I do with it?")

We'll likely get some answers come the Google IO developer conference in June. And I've got a feeling everyone's going to be surprised.

The new iPad

We can't not​ talk about the new iPad, can we? I'm not buying one. At least I'm not planning on buying one. We've got an iPad 2 here (back in the ancient times when they gave sequels suffixes), and for right now, right this second, it's plenty good enough.

But that's not to say the new iPad's screen isn't gorgeous. Holy crap, is that thing ever gorgeous. Fast, too, and pushing that many pixels is no small matter.

It was fun reading what all the early reviews had to say about battery life and LTE. And it was even more fun to discover that the new iPad has exactly the same battery magic as the Android-powered Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX. Mainly, it's got a bigger battery

At the same time, that's also disappointing. Throwing a higher-capacity battery at the problem is one way of solving the LTE power suck. While the Droid RAZR MAXX managed to keep things in a relatively slim and sleek design (check out our full review, by the way), as did the new iPad, that's not going to be an option for every manufacturer.

Inside baseball ...

Props to This America Life for how it handled its retraction of Mike Daisey's Foxconn production monologue. If you haven't heard the follow-up show, it's an example of how to handle something like this. And, in my own little journalistic world, I'm proud of how they handled it.

It was a shame to see blogs scramble to pile on — adding what your own "Apple sources" said regarding the story was a bit sad to see. If you're in the publishing business, you don't add to someone else's seppuku. It's This American Life's story to fix. Let them fix it.

I still remember being in a newsroom in 2004 when USA Today published its investigation into reporter Jack Kelley's body of work (I worked for another paper own by USAT's publisher, Gannett), and a year earlier with the fraud perpetuated by Jayson Blair of the New York Times. My former paper's had to go through a couple instances in the past year. Everyone in the publishing business should be chilled to the bone. I get angry just thinking about it. (To say nothing of what my wife — also an editor — has to say about the matter.)

It doesn't matter if Daisey's work was presented as journalistic fact or a dramatic and embellished re-enactment. The end result was the same as that of Blair and Kelley. False is false, wrong is wrong.

But I also know that This American Life will weather this storm and come back better because of it.

The Samsung Galaxy S III

Still doesn't exist. But the din of the rumor mill is growing louder day by day. Saturday morning's "leak," I believe, is bullshit on a number of levels. First off, it's pretty clearly in the vein of the Galaxy S Wifi 4.2. Second is that folks seemed to have forgotten that PR firms do more than device launches. The Weber Shandwick logo could be for a marketing campaign. Or a launch of the Galaxy S Wifi 4.2. Or something else entirely Or it could all be (and likely is) one big troll. Whatever.

The latest "leak" at least looks more like a phone. And there's also absolutely no proof that it's real, either. And for someone to suggest that it'll have an MAO'd casing like the HTC One X is just a little convenient, don'tcha think?

Gawd, I love the silly season. We'll find out soon enough, then folks can crow "You heard it here first!" For what that's worth.

In one ear and out the other ...

  • Have we really gone a whole week without another new Samsung Galaxy Note commercial? Whom do I have to thank for that?
  • That said, HTC could stand to do more general marketing while we wait for the HTC One line. How cool is that micro arc oxidation video? HTC's always seemed to be more about provoking emotion than flat-out selling products, in direct contrast to, say, Samsung. Let's see some of that.
  • The new Prometheus trailer. Holy crap!
  • Two weeks till Game of Thrones is back!
  • I mentioned this on Twitter, but the number of times Seesmic crashes while scrolling is beyond ridiculous. I'm still looking for a full-time Twitter client. Maybe I'm too needy.
  • Speaking of which, where the hell is a tablet-optimized version of the Google+ app? How many times has Google told developers how easy it is to spruce up their apps for tablets?

That's it for this week. I'm going outside now.