Samsung Galaxy Watch review: The do-everything smartwatch for Android owners

Samsung Galaxy Watch
(Image: © Andrid Central)

Samsung has put together a string of great smartwatches and fitness wearables over the last three years, leveraging the same basic principles and Samsung-specific synergies. From the launch of the Gear S2, Samsung's smartwatches have consistently provided more features, better fitness tracking, longer battery life, and arguably better styling than their Android Wear or Wear OS counterparts.

The new Galaxy Watch continues the trend.


  • Excellent display, even in sunlight
  • Rotating bezel is lovely
  • Health and fitness tracking are good
  • Software is helpful and polished
  • Hardware is robust and resistant


  • Always-on watch face kills the battery
  • Charges too slowly
  • Masculine design narrows appeal
  • Third-party apps are generally horrible

The Galaxy Watch doesn't provide particularly bold or unique styling, and in fact it isn't all that changed from the last two Gear smartwatches. The multi-step design with mixes of finishes and materials is reminiscent of the Gear S3 Frontier, but now comes in two sizes — 46mm, like the S3, but also 42mm similar to the Gear Sport.

Samsung Galaxy Watch vs. Samsung Gear Sport

But the Galaxy Watch is tidy, efficient and well built — albeit slightly masculine in terms of color and finishes. The silver and black models really skew to the male spectrum, and the rose gold option, only available in the 42mm size, is simply a difference in color, not a design change that would open this up to a more diverse audience. Most people are going to gravitate toward the 42mm just because of its size, and it's the one I recommend purely based on its comfort on a wider range of wrists.

In exchange for not having the diversity of design options as the Wear OS world, you get a fantastic experience elsewhere in the hardware. Samsung's circular OLED screens are beautiful and bright enough to use outdoors, including pseudo-auto brightness that will crank to max brightness in direct sunlight and dim down considerably at night. Wrapped around the screen is the now-standard rotating bezel, which I continue to sing the praises of as the best possible interaction method for a smartwatch.

Samsung didn't update the hardware much, because it really didn't need to.

The hardware really works because Samsung's own Tizen Wearable OS is tailor-made for it. The watch faces, notifications, widgets and apps all make great use of the circular space, and it's intuitive to act on everything by rotating the bezel, tapping on the screen or pressing the back or home buttons. I also never came across hiccups or stutters, either, which is a testament to Samsung's own-made processor that's optimized for the watch.

Tizen is also just packed with features, which can be a tad overwhelming but if tamed can be extremely useful. By configuring the dozen-plus widgets available out of the box, you can make the Galaxy Watch exactly the kind of device you need. You can focus on health tracking, or communication, or keeping up with everything throughout the day. Same goes for the watch faces, where you can choose a mechanical-style face (with a simulated ticking second hand to boot) or a full digital layout with tons of information.

Tizen is still far ahead of Wear OS in terms of features and customizability.

And no matter what, notifications are always available to the left of the watch face, controlled from your smartphone on a per-app basis. They work about as well as you can expect on a small screen, giving you a chance to ignore unimportant notifications, archive emails and quickly read messages — and you can even reply to important messages with canned responses, voice dictation or a T9-style keyboard.

The new Wear OS interface that just launched is a big improvement for that platform, but if you have any desire to customize or get more done on your smartwatch, Samsung's Tizen is far ahead of it.

The big software differentiator for Samsung is health and fitness tracking — which is still well ahead of Google's effort, despite the recent overhaul of Google Fit. It's not that Google Fit is bad, but that Samsung Health has just been around for so long and has things figured out. The Galaxy Watch accurately tracks daily activity like steps and floors, and can help log your food, water and caffeine intake. But it can also provide automatic (or manual) tracking and guidance for dozens of different workouts — and it also integrates with popular fitness apps like MapMyRun and Strava, among others, for data portability.

Samsung Health on the Galaxy Watch is good enough for anyone who wants to keep up with a healthy lifestyle.

The combination of a Galaxy Watch and Samsung Health is good enough for most people who want to lead a healthy lifestyle, and what it offers is easily above what I needed. I liked tracking my step goals and it worked just fine for runs both outside and on a treadmill. But I'd caution from thinking that it could challenge dedicated fitness watches from the likes of Garmin if you really need accurate tracking for your training. In my conversations with more serious runners and bicyclists, the accuracy of the tracking — particularly with GPS and pace information — still isn't up to speed with dedicated fitness wearables.

None of the advanced features of a smartwatch are worth much if your battery dies, which is why Samsung keeps putting so much emphasis on multi-day battery life with the Galaxy Watch. With my 42mm model, which has just a 270mAh battery, I could make it through the quoted three full days without charging — that is, when I left all of the settings on their defaults. That means the screen turned off after just 30 seconds, auto-GPS for workouts was not turned on, and the only actively-working fitness feature was heart rate monitoring on a 10-minute interval.

But once I turned on the always-on watch face, which is honestly the only way I want to wear a smartwatch because it looks so good, I could only make it about 30 hours before having to drop the Galaxy Watch on its charger. That's simply good, not great, especially considering Samsung is positioning the Galaxy Watch as being able to be worn all day and all night, with automatic sleep tracking built in. And If you also exercise outside using GPS on a regular basis, that 30-hour figure may not even be achievable.

Battery life is good — unless you want to have a great-looking always-on watch face.

And because the Galaxy Watch takes an excruciatingly slow two and a half hours to recharge fully, it isn't really a viable option to simply bump-charge it 10 or 15 minutes each morning — it just won't add enough if you're planning to use an always-on watch face. If you want to keep that watch face on at all times and preserve the proper mechanical watch look, you'll have to dedicate an hour-plus charge every couple days in addition to opportunistic charging here and there.

Or, you could always buy the larger 46mm version (for just $20 more), which is roughly the size of a flattened meatball but comes with a larger 1.3-inch display and 75% more battery capacity. That's enough extra capacity to get another day out of the watch before charging, though it's also so big I'd be surprised if you wanted to wear it to bed anyway, making overnight charging an easy battery management routine.

The Galaxy Watch is a wonderful overall smartwatch for anyone with an Android phone.

Samsung didn't do a ton to improve the Galaxy Watch over its predecessors, but that's mostly because those watches were already great. The Galaxy Watch continues to offer excellent hardware, a beautiful display and software that's uniquely tailored to the form factor and glorious rotating bezel. Its software is more advanced than Wear OS, and can be configured to offer just as much — or as little — as you need it for. It can be a daily fitness watch, or just a general smartwatch that provides notifications and useful information throughout your day — or both. For $50 you can jump up to an LTE-connected model to get even more done.

4 out of 5

Unless you have some specific draw to Wear OS because of its simplicity, or need the pro-level fitness tracking offered by dedicated fitness wearables, the Galaxy Watch is a wonderful overall smartwatch for Android owners. The only question, then, is which size you want. The 42mm model is the one to get for most people purely based on its case size being usable on more wrist sizes. But it makes a trade-off of having just average battery life — particularly if you want to use an always-on watch face. The $329 price is fitting for everything the Galaxy Watch (opens in new tab) considering everything it can do, and how good it looks while doing it.

Andrew was an Executive Editor, U.S. at Android Central between 2012 and 2020.

  • You mentioned that the Galaxy Watch is an overall wonderful watch for Android Owners, however it is important to note that the Galaxy Watch according to most is not recommended for non-samsung phones and more specifically T-Mobile's website actually states "compatible with Samsung phones only" as some features are lost when using non-samsung phones.
  • Yeah, I found out the hard way - had to return the Galaxy Watch before I even took it home because the LTE would not activate on my Pixel 2 XL. One point to be made about the Galaxy Watch is that MST has been taken out so it is only NFC.
  • Not a heck of a lot is lost compared to WearOS. I've been using a Galaxy watch and a Gear Sport with my non-Samsung phones and they have worked very well. Fitness tracking has been excellent, all notifications work, can reply to emails (using gmail) and texts. Only thing I couldn't do is answer the phone, but that was with the Gear Sport. You can now answer calls with the new Galaxy watch. WearOS/Android Wear is so much more difficult to set up and configure too compared to the Samsung watches. You would think WearOS would be easier to set up. Also, no Android watch can offer the battery life yet of the Samsung Tizen watches. I am done with Android Wear. BTW- I've used a LG Style and Moto 360 2nd edition watch prior to trying the Samsung watches. I still have the LG Style connected to one of my phones. I am pretty familiar with both watch operating systems.
  • What do you find difficult in setting up a Wear OS watch? You literally just install the Wear app to pair, then select the google account you want to sync on the watch if you have more than one. Having used Tizen watch before, I don’t like the separate app store that requires its separate login, and the ****** app selection.
  • Updating and syncing apps is a nightmare compared to Samsung, Connecting the watch and logging onto your account is fine with WearOS. It's trying to sync apps and getting the watch to update the apps that takes forever and sometimes does or does not work. Sometimes updates won't even work unless you force the watch to use wifi instead of the bluetooth connection.
  • Syncing apps hasn't really been a thing since 1.5, though. 2.0 doesn't use that approach and works pretty smoothly. Never run into an issue with this aspect.
  • I hate having to find and install apps from my watch. Much prefer the Tizen approach, install from watch or phone.
  • Dude, the WearOS setup is completely bugged, especially if your phone has multiple Google accounts on it. Look up how many people have to find tricks to make it work to sync to their device. The app selection is total garbage on the Samsung Wear App, but the WearOS account selection, if you're one of the people that has the glitch, is downright blood boiling.
  • This is what I came to hear about and was disappointed not to find. I have a Pixel 2 XL and would like to know what the experience is like with it.
  • I have the Gear S3 Frontier and the Pixel 2 XL. My experience is great, honestly. I get all my notifications on my watch and can reply to almost all of them. I can receive calls on my watch as well. I find Samsung Health better than all other fitness offerings and it works with the watch perfectly. My only disappointment with the watch has been Samsung Pay and that is in no way the Pixel 2 XL's fault. The pay app resets itself every few days and you have to go through the initial setup again. But I have nothing bad to say about using the Pixel 2 XL with Samsung's watch. Honestly though, I am not sure what I would gain if I had a Samsung phone. Can anyone elaborate on what is gained using a Samsung Phone with a Samsung Watch?
  • I agree 100% with this. I've been in the WearOS camp for 3+ years and I feel I owe Tizen an apology. It really works well, despite the third party apps support which really, I do not miss. Never really used them on WearOS and most of the time, they were half baked.
  • Works like a champ on my wife's Pixel 2 XL. Hasn't missed a single notification and she can respond to all of her messaging apps.
  • This is true for the LTE model but for the standard, it works perfectly. Works amazingly well on my wife's Pixel 2 XL.
  • I'm happy with my Skagen Falster. Wear OS just seems better to me for my OnePlus 6
  • Sure, the do-everything smartwatch that doesn't do Google Pay!!
  • It has Samsung Pay though which is arguably better. Has a reward system and everything. Also had way better card support for a while. Not sure if that's still true though. I stopped using Google Pay because it was a waste of my time.
  • That doesn't matter where I live, as Google Pay hasn't released yet here. Besides, Samsung Pay is superior due to working on all terminals (for phones and Gear S3 anyway)
  • If it had the legacy pay support like S3 would buy today. May hold on to it a little longer, but the Watch looks good.
  • « I continue to sing the praises of as the best possible interaction method for a smartwatch » Yes, for a circular smartwatch :)
  • Wow, a review mentioning that some software by Samsung is better than its Google counterpart? I'm astonished.
  • I've had my S2 for ages now and I think you're vastly overstating the importance of the always on display. Besides the fact that the light from it bothers me at night, I always rotate my wrist to check the display so having AOD on is really only a benefit for everyone else who might glance at your watch. That said, I do agree that the fitness tracking is lacking (maybe improved in this new model) in that the step count is always understated (I once wore my old Fitbit at the same time and got at least another 1,000 steps from that). The watch often says it can't find my heart beat even though I can see the rythm on the display. There's also no "general workout" option in Samsung Health even though they have options to track individual exercises, nobody is going to do that (e.g. start a workout to track your situps, then start another workout to track pushups, then start another workout to track squats etc). So, as a Gear/Wear user if you want a fitness tracker, don't get this. If you want a really good Smartwatch that has some fitness tracking then do. </rant>
  • To prevent it at night we get goodnight mode. It's new in Tizen 4 and is great. Basically it's DnD, blocks:
    Notifications except alarms.
    AoD is turned off.
    Bezel wake is turned off.
    Raise to wake is turned off.
  • As a current S2 owner as well, I completely disagree with you. The one thing that I wish I had is the ability to have a battery that last all day without any issues with the watch face shown. I don't want to flick my wrist, which doesn't always work on the 1st try, and basically make all those nice watch faces you download irrelevant since most of the time nobody can see them. On the other hand, what I don't care about is whether it lasts 2 days, 4 days, or a week. It doesn't bother me to place something on a charger like I do with my cell phone every night. If the 42mm truly does last more than 24 hours with the watch face always on, then I may end up getting it. I don't think either of us are wrong, just different preferences. Where I think you are wrong is assuming that all S2 owners will feel the article is 'vastly overstating the importance' of the always on display. To you maybe.
  • Completely worthless watch for me without MST for Samsung Pay. The 2 main things I do with my S3 Frontier is use it to tell time, and use it several times a day to pay for things at the store. About 80% of my Samsung Pay payments are done using MST. I will likely never buy another watch unless they put MST back in it. If my S3 Frontier seizes to function, I guess I will have to figure out something else. Hopefully that won't happen soon.
  • Samsung Pay on my S3 Frontier resets it self every few days and I have to completely set it back up. Does this not happen to you? I've stopped using it because I was tired of going back through set up each time.
  • I never have this problem. It stays setup.
  • I have never had this issue. I did have to set everything back up when I switched from a Note8 to a Note9, which was irritating, but once it is set up, it stays set up for me.
  • I would never buy another Samsung watch again. My S3's new favorite thing is deleting all my credit cards every two weeks. The problem with this is not just the pain of adding them again, but having to call certain issuers (us bank) that require a phone call to activate and the phone call itself is always an inquisition. I've given up on the watch at this point.
  • Same here, I do not even use this function now because of this. It's been like this for month for me.
  • I've just never had any luck with these watches with a non Samsung phone, specifically losing Google Assistant and never had any luck using any sms app besides the Samsung one which I don't believe is even available on other phones. My past ones never worked properly with the Android Messages app.
  • The UK LTE version is listed on BT shop.
  • Cool watch but really buggy. Won't count steps properly (as in useless), Heart rate sensor is not stable, activity tracking is not reliable, lacking apps... Maybe some OS updates will make it better, but I wouldn't recommend anybody to buy it at the moment.
  • This might be my first smart watch. I'd love it if the heart rate meter was accurate...and, in the past, I have heard that smart watch heart rate monitors were not to be trusted. Is this still the case? (and if the blood pressure thing is accurate, that would be amazing!)