Bottom line: The LG V60 doesn't stand out in one specific area, but is instead a well-rounded flagship phone at a competitive price point. It's very large, and has software and a display that feel stuck in the past, but those are marginal issues. Elsewhere the phone looks and feels good, has incredible battery life, capable cameras, a headphone jack and a full spec sheet. There's great value here for under $1000.
- Incredible battery life
- Good speakers and headphone jack
- Solid-feeling hardware
- Capable cameras
- Complete spec sheet
- Very large and cumbersome
- Software is stuck in the past
- 1080p 60Hz display with big bezels
- Dual Screen has limited use
LG managed to zig when Samsung zagged. In a year where Samsung set the standard for flagship phones at $1000 for the Galaxy S20 (opens in new tab) and $1400 for the S20 Ultra (opens in new tab), LG rolled out the comparable V60 ThinQ 5G (henceforth, simply V60) for under $950. Despite the price savings, the V60 generally has the same specs and features, including a huge battery and 5G — and even has a couple novel features like a 3.5 mm headphone jack.
The issue is that LG isn't coming from a position of strength here. Its last few rounds of flagships have been lackluster, yet still commanded prices matching all of the superior competition. So it's a relief to see the V60 come out with an actually reasonable price that slots under the highest-tier phones and actually matches its capabilities. And interestingly, the result is a flagship that cuts on price and makes a case for itself as a solid value option.
LG V60 What I like
LG gains points for getting all of the basics right, and then building on top of that with many extras we like to see. First, the basics.
The hardware isn't going to win any design awards, but frankly few companies are doing anything novel or interesting — in my review of the Galaxy S20 Ultra I pointed out how Samsung's design language has stagnated as well. LG's executed on the glass-and-metal sandwich properly with a solid frame, tight tolerances, a reassuring heft and a nice little bit of flair in this blue-and-gold colorway. And inside, you have the latest Snapdragon 865 paired with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Elsewhere, there's a really good optical in-display fingerprint sensor that's faster and more accurate than the Galaxy S20+, IP68 resistance and microSD expansion.
|Operating System||Android 10|
2460x1080 (20.5:9), 403 ppi
|Processor||Qualcomm Snapdragon 865|
|Expansion||microSD up to 2TB|
|Rear Camera 1||64MP, 0.8-micron|
f/1.8, 78-degree FoV, OIS
8K24 video recording
|Rear Camera 2||13MP, 1-micron|
f/1.9, 117-degree FoV
|Front Camera||10MP, 1.22-micron|
f/1.9, 72.5-degree FoV
|Security||In-display fingerprint sensor|
|Audio||3.5 mm headphone jack|
Quick Charge 4.0
|Dimensions||169.3 x 77.6 x 8.79 mm|
And even though this is a much less expensive phone than the Galaxy S20+, it still includes complete 5G support for the carriers it's launching on. I've been using the AT&T model in New York City, and regularly found its 5G network (Sub-6, from what I can tell) in upper Manhattan. Speeds landed in the 100-150 mbps range (just 10-15 mbps upload), which is much like my experience using T-Mobile's burgeoning mmWave 5G network. Both carriers clearly don't have a ton of spectrum in this area, so speeds aren't blistering fast, but you aren't going to buy this phone to use 5G today — it's a long-term play.
Now, the extras. LG is once again nailing the audio game. The V60's stereo speakers are crisp and clear, even at max volume, which is also noticeably louder than the Galaxy S20 Ultra and Pixel 4 XL I was using previously. And of course, there's a headphone jack! The increasingly rare port is here, and it's paired with LG's standard Quad DAC for solid wired sound.
LG also clearly prioritized battery life here, and it paid off. The V60 has incredible battery life, combining an efficient processor, 1080p display and relatively simple software with a 5000mAh battery yields fantastic results. I never ended a day with less than 30% battery, even on a heavy day with 5 hours of "screen on" time and an hour-long Duo group video call. On an easy weekend day, I was off the charger for about 13 hours and only used only 50% of the battery, even with over 3.5 hours of "screen on" time and both streaming music and using GPS for a 1.5-hour run.
This is beyond what I experienced on the Galaxy S20 Ultra set to the same screen resolution and refresh rate. This is some of the best, most consistent battery life I've seen on a high-end phone, and it's one of the V60's biggest strengths. When you realize how great battery life is here, you can start to understand why LG was willing to make the phone so thick and heavy.
Continuing in the positive column are the cameras, where LG went "basic" with just two lenses and no dedicated telephoto camera in a year when zoom is set to be a big differentiator. The main 64MP sensor uses 4-to-1 binning to take 16MP photos, and I actually really like the look. Coming off the heels of using the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which feels burdened by Samsung's heavy-handed processing, the V60 has a very light and subtle amount of processing. Photos look very natural, with balanced colors and no harsh over-processing even in HDR.
The trade-off is a distinct lack of fine detail — as soon as you zoom in on photos, you see that details are soft across the board, though it's rarely noticeable when viewed at full size. You also notice that dark areas brightened through HDR are quite grainy, but much like the simple colors this is something I'd prefer to edit later myself than have the phone try and likely to a bad job of processing itself.
The exact same characteristics are present in low-light photos, with natural colors and softness in fine details. But once again LG's approach of not over-processing works in its favor — many camera apps try too hard to smoothen, sharpen and brighten, and get it wrong. The camera tends to lean on slow shutter speeds (1/10 second was a common occurrence), though, which can produce blurry shots with seemingly small amounts of hand shake. But if you can hold steady, you can get surprisingly good low-light shots.
The camera app offers up 2X to 10X digital zoom on the main sensor. 2X photos look totally fine, with no discernible quality drop-off, but 4X zoom is definitely dodgy, especially at night, and the maximum-allowed 10X is really rough even in good lighting. And even though the 2X photos are fine, it's just a digital crop, so you aren't actually getting a change in field-of-view or perspective that make "telephoto" photos look truly different. Zoom is just one of the things you're giving up with the V60 compared to the S20+, and that's probably fine for a lot of people.
The wide-angle camera is just as solid as any other out there, providing a worthwhile trade-off in quality in exchange for an interesting an dunique field of view. Though with 1-micron pixels and no OIS, it struggles in low-light scenes in ways that the S20's doesn't. Even with this limitation, and the reality of where the zoom quality stands, I would still take an ultra-wide over a telephoto if the decision has to be made to just keep one.
LG V60 What I don't like
It was tough to decide which section the display belongs in — as you can see, I put it down here. On one hand, it's really solid: the 6.8-inch OLED panel is bright and colorful, and plenty clear outdoors in sunlight. It will get the job done for anyone; but it's also not as good as what Samsung has on offer. Off-axis color shift is more severe, it doesn't get as bright, and most noticeably it's stuck at 60Hz refresh rate when the entire industry is moving to 90 or 120Hz. It's also surrounded by hilariously large bezels, which are in full view with no curving on the sides, and a conspicuous teardrop notch for the front-facing camera
The size of the screen bezels are a harbinger of the remarkable size of this phone. If you can believe it, the V60 is wider and taller than the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which was already beyond the limit of what many people would consider manageable in one hand. I've obviously been conditioned to this size of phone having just used the S20 Ultra (in a case, no less), but even still I found myself struggling to deal with it. The V60 is effectively the same weight as the Galaxy S20 Ultra, but feels much larger because of its dimensions and its squared-off slab-like design does nothing to hide its size.
Reaching anywhere near the top of the screen requires some hand contortion, and even still you probably won't get your thumb up there. And with this width and weight, hand fatigue is a real concern when you want to hold it in one hand and scroll through feeds or read for any length of time. Even though I recognize that the size is part of the deal when you get a battery this big, this could easily be a deal-breaker for some people.
Let's shift to software, where you find another one of LG's historically weak areas. This is Android 10, thankfully, and it has LG's latest overall design language refresh that has a simplified interface, thinner lines, lighter colors and many elements that have been shifted toward the bottom of the screen to make it easier to use on bigger phones. Unfortunately, it's still burdened by years and years of cruft that just makes it feel downright old and unintuitive when coming from any other Android phone.
The launcher has ancient animations, no gesture for dropping the notification shade, an app drawer that doesn't stay sorted when you add/remove apps, and old iconography throughout. The software even still warns you to not remove your battery when your phone freezes, an error message still hanging around from the G5 in 2016. Things mostly work as you expect, and none of the quirks get to real annoyance levels, but when you set it side-by-side with software from Samsung, Google and OnePlus you just scratch your head and wonder if anyone in LG is willing to take a critical look at its own software and bring it up to modern-day expectations.
And I have to mention what AT&T has done to this phone's software, because LG isn't selling the phone unlocked here in the U.S. — only through Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile. AT&T pre-loads over two dozen apps, and includes another utility that pushes notifications and attempts to trick you into re-installing its apps and other app trails. It's just disgusting. My understanding is the T-Mobile model is far better in this respect.
Nope, I didn't forget about the Dual Screen attachment — though you may have, if you knew about it in the first place. This is what looks at first to be a rough-and-tumble rugged case with a fold-over screen cover, but that cover actually has a second identical 6.8-inch display inside. The case provides no extra battery, and runs the display over USB-C built into the case.
I can give LG credit for executing on its idea — the Dual Screen works. You can run two apps simultaneously, or span many apps across both screens, and it works in landscape and portrait. The screen also turns off when folded around the back of the phone. But for that extra utility, you're burdened by even more thickness, width, height and weight — on a phone that's already huge. It'll be interesting for some people, but it isn't a feature with mainstream appeal.
LG V60 Should you buy it?
In keeping its focus, and not trying to do anything new or particularly exciting, LG set itself up to actually make a really good phone. It doesn't have any blunders or missteps here; the only thing you can accuse the V60 of is being, well, boring. It doesn't have one thing that would make anyone lust after it or choose it over the Galaxy S20+. That is, until you factor in pricing: the Galaxy S20+ is $1200, the S20 Ultra is $1400 ... and the V60, at its most expensive, is $950 at Verizon (opens in new tab). And it's $900 at AT&T (opens in new tab).
3.5 out of 5
The value is particularly strong at T-Mobile, where you can get the V60 without the Dual Screen for just $800 (opens in new tab), or just two-thirds the price of a Galaxy S20+. With these specs, the only comparable phone in my eyes is the Google Pixel 4 XL (opens in new tab), which has a considerably better camera and software experience, but considerably weaker battery life and is missing some of the V60's extras.
For only $800, or even at $900, the V60 offers a really good flagship phone experience — even though it isn't a perfect match for every single top-end spec and feature, and can't match Samsung's qualities in display, or the rest of the industry in software design. If you can look past some of its quirks and small shortcomings, and deal with its size, you'll save hundreds of dollars and get excellent battery life in a well-rounded 5G flagship phone.
LG V60 ThinQ 5G
The V60 offers you most of what you'd get in a Galaxy S20+ for hundreds less. It lacks some polish, but has good specs, nice hardware and exceptional battery life.
Andrew was an Executive Editor, U.S. at Android Central between 2012 and 2020.
Thanks for the write up. I'm really interested in the tmobile version. All though I'll have to wait until later to purchase due to current circumstances
I wonder if it's unlocked. I have both a TMO and a Verizon account. Could I switch between the two?
No unlocked variant in the US.
3.5/5? Seriously? I bet if it had a Samsung or OP logo on it while being the exact same phone you would've given it at least a 4.5. The bias against LG continues and why isn't there still a V60 forum?
I do feel that the tone here is much better than they usually do here at AC, but I do agree that the review write up does not match the star rating.
Come on AC! Just say it is a damn good phone for the price. It obviously is not perfect (no device is), nor is it for everyone (because no phone is).
I really struggled between 3.5 and 4 here (i.e. if we rated out of 10, it's a 7.5 for me). Ultimately its huge size, frustrating software and few areas of lacking polish (display and camera) dropped it down. It's a good phone! And I still recommended people buy it if you want to save money on a flagship. But this thing ain't perfect.
Frustrating software? Navigating my friends galaxy A20 or whatever was far more confusing than any LG UI. In fact, so far on the V60 I've yet the urge to install Microsoft launcher. Plus, neither Samsung can record HiFi audio out of the camera.
Score seems fair to me, and I'm someone whose very interested in the device. I don't care about the score,. I care about the thoroughness of the review. And this one covered it well. I don't think it's as a good of a device as an S20+ but at 300 bucks cheaper I agree it might be a more than satisfactory choice for many including myself
Ditto on the V60 forum, we need one!
For real... Every time Samsung comes out with a new phone, this site has 200 "articles" about cases, battery packs, and which accessories work best with it. They have multiple reviews for the same phone by different people and then more reviews a month later to see how it's "holding up." But then they'll only have 1 review for an LG phone, keep it on the front page for a day or two, and then replace it with 8 articles like "Here's why Samsung is so awesome for making folding phones." And on each LG review they say something like "For some reason, nobody talks about LG anymore." I guess if they could get more Amazon affiliate links for LG devices, things would be different.
"It's also surrounded by hilariously large bezels" On what planet are those "hilariously large?"
Planet Earth, year 2020.
I'll take larger than average bezel's over a curved edge Phone any day. BTW, I don't see any mention of the bezels being comically large on the iphone 11 pro review.
I didn't review the iPhone 11 Pro.
DFranch, i completely agree with you about the warped sides of the screens 👍👍
I enjoyed reading this review. I am currently looking into getting a new device, and I this may be the device to pry me away from my original Pixel. That being said, I have two issues with the device.
The first issue came when you said "The LG V60 doesn't stand out in one specific area..." Except for having, and this is not hyperbole, the best headphone jack available on a consumer smart phone.
Secondly, you stated "This is some of the best, most consistent battery life I've seen on a high-end phone, and it's one of the V60's biggest strengths." This also sounds like the phone standing out in a specific area...
I appreciate the critical, but positive review here, and look forward to AC giving more non-Samsung phones a fair shake.
For those who have to have a headphone jack, yes, that's obviously a stand-out feature. But the consistent sales of flagship phones without headphone jacks seems to indicate people aren't making a buying decision based on it. I agree the battery life could be considered a standout feature, but there are other phones with great battery life as well, even if they're not precisely the same as the V60 they're close. The V60's longevity is impressive, but it alone does not make the phone an instant buy.
I guess I wonder who really made that decision on the headphone jack. Did people make the decision, or did Android manufactures make the decision for us after seeing how much money Apple was making off of lighting dongles and AirPods? We as consumers could have fought harder for the port, but that timetable seemed to happen rather quickly.
I really enjoyed reading your review here. I thought it was incredibly fair and was lacking the general gloom and defeatism I read in the Android Blog space when it comes to LG these days. I offer my battery and headphone criticisms because I personally felt like those were aspects that were mentioned in the review and not called out as strongly in the conclusions.
Any plans to make it on the AC Podcast and discuss the V60? They mentioned it last show but I felt like that commentary would be improved hearing from your hands on experience.
Thanks for writing the review!
There's obviously a chicken-and-the-egg situation with the headphone jack disappearing from high-end phones. But ultimately what ended up happening was the headphone jack started being removed, and people kept buying phones anyway. I'm sure that nobody wanted the headphone jack to go away, and would prefer to have it if there was no other trade-off, but I don't think it's at the high level of need it once was and that other aspects of the phone experience are far more important when it comes to choosing a phone to buy.
That is a fair point. Thanks for following up!
It'd be great if they could just join the Android One program, and get nice, clean software with fast updates.
I find the final star rating to be rather harsh and yet another in a long line of biased reviews deriding LG. Although the reviewer did a comprehensive job with strengths and weaknesses, giving a 3.5 is incongruent with the assessment. Reviewers seem reluctant to actually say that LG make great phones. It almost seems that they expect a higher level of perfection compared to other brands. There are many strengths that don't seem to matter to critics: Audiophile sound quality through a headphone jack, great battery life, awesome dual screen. I love my G8X and the second screen comes in very handy for my job. As for the screen itself, having a lower refresh rate and resolution are worthy tradeoffs for longer battery life. Secondly, people in research studies could not distinguish between QHD vs. HD displays. And just because most of the industry greed $ has killed the headphone jack and that people keep buying phones without that feature doesn't mean it's not a strength. People buy these gimped phones because they come from the mobile duopoly. It's ironic that this site pushes wireless headphones/earbuds so aggressively but glosses over the fact that wireless audio is by and large inferior to having a wired experience. LG is the brand that has "courage" (sorry Apple) to not follow the pack and provide something that should never have been deemed obsolete. I agree with an earlier poster who said that if this same phone was released by a big name like Samsung and Apple (especially Apple), people would be gushing over the V60.
I'll never buy another LG flagship device. They suck at updates and are overpriced. Keep those ****-star reviews coming, LG earned it lol. And in complete honesty, I like LG phones, I tried an s10+ and returned it 3 hours later and happily went back to my hobbled v20. LG shoukd stick to mid tier, that is what they are worth.
I think it's a fair score, LG software is pretty bad and they aren't good with updates either. I do like the headphone and the price for the size, it's a big phone that's a cheaper alternative to the ultra. I can't complain but with LG and their lack of sales how long will they be around so factor in everything the score is pretty fair.
I gave up my Pixel 4XL for the V60 and dont regret it at all. The fact that I have full blown 5G, a headphone jack connected to a quad DAC, and a 5000mAh battery means I have a beast of a phone that is future proof. I've always like LG's UX so no loss for me, the cameras are actually better than I thought they would be, the 3D effect is actually fun when taking pics of the kids and dogs. The biggest surprise is the screen, its more vibrant than the one on my Pixel 4XL. If LG had put a 90hz panel on the darned thing, this would be my phone of the year.
Get the best of Android Central in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to Android Central. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.